Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative evaluation of coil and hall probes in hole detection and thickness measurement on aluminum plates using eddy current testing

  • Magnetic and Electromagnetic Methods
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The design, test, and comparison of one coil probe and one Hall probe using eddy current testing in the field of non-destructive evaluation is presented. Real tests were performed using alumi- num plates. This research concludes that (1) both probes provided broadband frequency responses up to 1000 KHz, which are wide enough for the most common applications; (2) the coil probe provided higher signal to noise ratio (SNR) than the Hall probe; (3) both probes detected the four holes success- fully and provided enough sensitivity to classify them by diameter; and (4) the coil probe provided higher accuracy than the Hall probe when measuring thickness lower than 1 mm, and lower accuracy when measuring thickness higher than 1.5 mm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Haan, V.O., de Jong, P.A., Perez, L., and Dolabdjian, C., Towards material characterization and thickness measurements using pulsed eddy currents implemented with an improved giant magneto resistance magneto- meter, in Proceedings of 9th. European NDT Conference (ECNDT’06), Berlin, Germany, 2006, pp. 1–8.

  2. Syasko, V., Chertov, D., and Ivkin, A., Measuring the thicknesses of the walls of carbon composite materials using the eddy-current phase method, Russ J. Nondestr. Test., 2011, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 561–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Garcia-Martin, J., Gomez-Gil, J., and Vazquez-Sanchez, E., Non-Destructive techniques based on eddy cur- rent testing, Sensors, 2011, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 2525–2565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yuting, W., Zhang, C., and Lijun, X., A simplified model for non-destructive thickness measurement immune to the lift-off effect, Proceedings of IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), Hangzhou, China, 2011, pp. 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Novkovski, N., Progress and limitations in magnetic field measurements, in Geomagnetics for Aeronautical Safety, Rasson, J. and Delipetrov, T., Eds., Springer Netherlands, 2006, pp. 201–212.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Zinan, L., Zheng, X., and Haijun, L., The application of magnetic sensor in MIT, Proceedings of World Auto- mation Congress (WAC 2008), Hawaii, USA, 2008, pp. 1–4.

  7. Bernieri, A., Betta, G., and Ferrigno, L., A multi-sensor probe for non-destructive testing on conductive mate- rials, Proceedings of IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IMTC/2002), Anchorage, AK, USA, 2002, pp. 861–866.

  8. Thollon, F., Lebrun, B., Burais, N., and Jayet, Y., Numerical and experimental study of eddy current probes in NDT of structures with deep flaws, NDT E Int., 1995, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, Z. and Miya, K., A new approach for optimal design of eddy current testing probes, J. Nondestructiv. Eval., 1998, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 105–116.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jongwoo, J., Jiseong, H., and Jinyi, L., Quantitative nondestructive evaluation of the crack on the austenite stainless steel using the induced eddy current and the Hall sensor array, Proceedings of IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IMTC 2007), Warsaw, Poland, 2007, pp. 1–6.

  11. He, Y., Pan, M., Luo, F., and Tian, G.Y., Pulsed eddy current imaging and frequency spectrum analysis for hid- den defect nondestructive testing and evaluation, NDT E Int., 2011, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 344–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Paasi, J., Kalliohaka, T., Korpela, A., Soderlund, L., Hermann, P.F., Kvitkovic, J., et al., Homogeneity studies of multifilamentary BSCCO tapes by three-axis Hall sensor magnetometry, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., 1999, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1598–1601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. He, Y., Luo, F., Pan, M., Weng, F., Hu, X., Gao, J., et al., Pulsed eddy current technique for defect detection in aircraft riveted structures, NDT E Int., 2010, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 176–181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramos, H., Postolache, O., Alegria, F.C., and Lopes Ribeiro, A., Using the skin effect to estimate cracks depths in metallic structures, Proceedings of IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC 2009), Singapore, 2009, pp. 1361–1366.

  15. Tian, G.Y., Sophian, A., Taylor, D., and Rudlin, J., Multiple sensors on pulsed eddy-current detection for 3-D subsurface crack assessment, IEEE Sens. J., 2005, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 90–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Angeli, M., Burrascano, P., Cardelli, E., Fiori, S., and Resteghini, S., Classification of eddy current NDT data by probabilistic neural networks, in Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN’99), Wash- ington D.C., USA, 1999, pp. 4012–4014.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Garcia-Martin.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garcia-Martin, J., Gomez-Gil, J. Comparative evaluation of coil and hall probes in hole detection and thickness measurement on aluminum plates using eddy current testing. Russ J Nondestruct Test 49, 482–491 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830913080044

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830913080044

Keywords

Navigation