Skip to main content
Log in

Signal processing of magnetic flux leakage surface flaw inspect in pipeline steel

  • Magnetic Methods
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The magnetic flux leakage (MFL) method has established itself as the most widely used inline inspection technique for the evaluation of pipelines. The MFL signal is usually contaminated by various noise sources This paper presents the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) for enhancing signal-to-noise ratio. Experiments are conducted on the pipeline steel samples with different depth artificial defects. The MFL signal is decomposed into several intrinsic mode functions by EMD. Some modes are selected to reconstruct a new signal considering their frequencies and energy. The reconstructed signal has a better signal-to-noise ration. The results show that EMD technology is efficient in eliminating noise in the MFL signal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Udpa, L., Mandayam, S., and Udpal, S.S., Developments in Gas Pipeline Inspection Technology, Materials Evaluation, 1996, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 467–472.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jin Tao, Que Peiwen, Chen Liang, et al., Research on a Recognition Algorithm of Offshore-Pipeline Defect during Magnetic-Flux Inspection, Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing, 2005, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Huang Zuoying, Que Peiwen, and Chen Liang, 3D FEM Analysis in Magnetic Flux Leakage Method, NDT&E International, 2006, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 61–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Afzal, M. and Udpa, S., Advanced Signal Processing of Magnetic Flux Leakage Data Obtained from Seamless Gas Pipeline, NDT & E International, 2002, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 449–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Afzal, M., Polikar, R., Udpa, L., and Udpa, S., Adaptive Noise Cancellation Schemes for Magnetic Flux Leakage Signals Obtained from Gas Pipeline Inspection, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing — Proceedings, 2001, no. 6, pp. 3389–3392.

  6. Liang Wei, Que Peiwen, Zhang Qi, et al., Ultrasonic Defect Detection of a Petroleum Pipeline in a Viscoelastic Medium, Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing, 2006, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 692–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen Tianlu, Que Peiwen, Zhang Qi, et al., Ultrasonic Nondestructive Testing Accurate Sizing and Locating Technique Based on Time-of-flight-diffraction Method, Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing, 2005, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 594–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang Qi, Que Pei-Wen, Liu Qing-Kun et al., Application of Empirical Mode Decomposition to Ultrasonic Signal, Proceedings—IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005, vol. 3, pp. 1789–1792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Published in Russian in Defektoskopiya, 2008, Vol. 44, No. 12, pp. 72–79.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, L., Li, X., Qin, G. et al. Signal processing of magnetic flux leakage surface flaw inspect in pipeline steel. Russ J Nondestruct Test 44, 859–867 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830908120097

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830908120097

Keywords

Navigation