Skip to main content
Log in

Evolutionary Poisson Factorization Based Multiple Trust Relationships

  • APPLICATION PROBLEMS
  • Published:
Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The task of predicting retweet behavior is the key step for modeling the information diffusion in social networks and also is applied for a variety of fields such as personalized recommendation and topic detection. While much work has been conducted for mining textual content that users generate, existing studies on predictions of retweet behavior have not taken full advantage of the effects of multiple social relationships between users based dynamic Poisson factorization. To achieve this goal, we develop a multiple trust relationship evolutionary Poisson factorization, a new Bayesian factorization model that incorporates multiple trust relationships between users into an evolutionary Poisson factorization model to predict retweeting behavior. This model can obtain the impacts of a variety of social influences for user’s latent preferences as well as models the time evolving latent user and item factors. We studied our models with several large real-world data sets, and the experiments show the superior performance of our proposed method compared with the state-of-the-art approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. M. E. Basbug, and B. Engelhardt, “Hierarchical Compound Poisson Factorization,” Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. 48, 1795–1803 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. R. Bild, Y. Liu, R. P. Dick, Z. M. Mao, and D. S. Wallach, “Aggregate characterization of user behavior in twitter and analysis of the retweet graph,” ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 15, 4 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2700060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Bo, J. Liang, Y. Sha, and L. Wang, “Message clustering based matrix factorization model for retweeting behavior prediction,” in Proc. of the 24th ACM Int. Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management, Melbourne, 2015 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2016), pp. 1843–1846 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2806416.2806650

  4. J. Bo, J. Liang, Y. Sha, L. Wang, Z. Kuang, R. Li, and P. Li, “Unifying user and message clustering information for retweeting behavior prediction,” in Web-Age Information Management. WAIM 2016, Ed. by B. Cui, N. Zhang, J. Xu, X. Lian, and D. Liu, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9659 (Springer, Cham, 2016), pp. 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39958-4_23

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. A. J. B. Chaney, D. M. Blei, T. Eliassi-Rad, “A probabilistic model for using social networks in personalized item recommendation,” in Proc. of the 9th ACM Conf. on Recommender Systems, Vienna, 2015 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2015), pp. 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/2792838.2800193

  6. Y. Chen, C. Yin, and W. Zuo, “Time-aware social hierarchical poisson factorization for personalized recommendation,” Pattern Recognit. Image Anal. 30, 778–785 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054661820040070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. H. Chen, Y. Fan, W. Tan, J. Zhang, B. Bai, and Z. Gao, “Time-Aware Collaborative Poisson Factorization for Service Recommendation,” in IEEE Int. Conf. on Web Services, San Francisco, 2016 (IEEE, 2016), pp. 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWS.2016.33

  8. F. Chong, T. Chua, R. J. Oentaryo, and E.P. Lim, “Modeling temporal adoptions using dynamic matrix factorization,” in IEEE 13th Int. Conf. on Data Mining, Dallas, Tex., 2013 (IEEE, 2013), pp. 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2013.25

  9. N. Du, Y. Wang, N. He, J. M. Sun, and L. Song, “Time-sensitive recommendation from recurrent user activities,” in Proc. of the 28th Int. Conf. on Neural Information Processing Systems, Montreal, 2015, Ed. by C. Cortes, D. D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, and R. Garnett (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2015), pp. 3492–3500.

  10. J. B. Griesner, T. Abdessalem, H. Naacke, and P. Dosne, “ALGeoSPF: A hierarchical factorization model for POI recommendation,” in IEEE/ACM Int. Conf. on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), Barcelona, 2018 (IEEE, 2018), pp. 87–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2018.8508249

  11. M. Hoffman, D. Blei, C. Wang, and J. Paisley, “Stochastic variational inference,” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 14, 1303–1347 (2013).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. S. A. Hosseini, K. Alizadeh, A. Khodadadi, A. Arabzadeh, M. Farajtabar, H. Zha, and H. R. Rabiee, “Recurrent Poisson factorization for temporal recommendation,” in Proc. of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Halifax, Canada, 2017 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2017), pp. 847–855. https://doi.org/10.1145/3097983.3098197

  13. S. D. Hridoy, A. Chetan, B. Joshi, and T. Chakraborty, “Retweet us, we will retweet you: Spotting collusive retweeters involved in blackmarket services,” in IEEE/ACM Int. Conf. on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, Barcelona, 2018 (IEEE, 2018), pp. 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2018.8508801

  14. S. Jie, N. Dong, and Z. Qian, “A real-time algorithm for small group detection in medium density crowds,” Pattern Recognit. Image Anal. 28, 282–287 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054661818020074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. B. Ju, Y. Qian, M. Ye, R. Ni, and C. Zhu, “Using dynamic multi-task non-negative matrix factorization to detect the evolution of user preferences in collaborative filtering,” PLoS ONE 10, e0135090 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. C. L. Laurent, R. Ranganath, M. James, and D. M. Blei, “Dynamic Poisson factorization,” in Proc. of the 9th ACM Conf. on Recommender Systems, Vienna, 2015 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2015), pp. 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1145/2792838.2800174

  17. D. Li, C. Miao, S. Chu, J. Mallen, T. Yoshioka, and P. Srivastaba, “Stable matrix approximation for top-N recommendation on implicit feedback data,” Hawaii Int. Conf. on System Sciences, Hilton Waikoloa Village, Hawaii, 2018 (2018), pp. 1563–1572.

  18. L. Linna, L. J. Wang, X. Q. Jiang, H. Han, and Y. Zhai, “A new algorithm for literature recommendation based on a bibliographic heterogeneous information network,” Chin. J. Electron. 27, 761–767 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1049/cje.2018.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Makki, A. J. Soto, S. Brooks, and E. E. Milios, “Active information retrieval for linking Twitter posts with political debates,” in IEEE 14th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), Miami, 2015 (IEEE, 2015), pp. 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2015.142

  20. B. M. Marlin, R. S. Zemel, S. Roweis, and M. Slaney, “Collaborative filtering and the missing at random assumption,” in Proc. of the Twenty-Third Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Vancouver, Canada, 2007 (AUAI Press, Arlington, Va., 2007), pp. 267–275.

  21. F. Z. Nian and Z. Dang, “Message propagation in the network based on node credibility,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 32, 1850106 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979218501060

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. G. Prem, J. M. Hofman, and D. M. Blei, “Scalable Recommendation with Hierarchical Poisson Factorization,” in Proc. of the Thirty-First Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Amsterdam, 2015, Ed. by M. Meila and T. Heskes (AUAI Press, Arlington, Va., 2015), pp. 326–335.

  23. J. F. Rao, F. H. Ture, X. Niu, and J. Lin, “Mining the temporal statistics of query terms for searching social media posts,” in Proc. of the ACM SIGIR Int. Conf. on Theory of Information Retrieval, Amsterdam, 2017 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2017), pp. 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1145/3121050.3121052

  24. B. Sun, C. Hu, W. Xu, and H. Fan, “Discovering latent influence in online social retweet behaviors,” in IEEE First Int. Conf. on Data Science in Cyberspace (DSC), Changsha, China, 2016 (IEEE, 2016), pp. 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1109/DSC.2016.26

  25. X. Tan, Y. Guo, Y. Chen, and W. Zhu, “Characterizing user popularity preference in a large-scale online video streaming system,” in 6th Int. Conf. on Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia (ICWMMN 2015), Beijing, 2015 (IET, 2015), pp. 246–249. https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2015.0949

  26. P. Ulrich and N. Koenigstein, “One-class collaborative filtering with random graphs,” in Proc. of the 22nd Int. Conf. on World Wide Web, Rio de Janeiro, 2013 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2013), pp. 999–1008. https://doi.org/10.1145/2488388.2488475

  27. X. Wang, B. Fang, H. Zhang, and S. Su, “Predicting the popularity of online content based on the weak ties theory,” in IEEE Third Int. Conf. on Data Science in Cyberspace (DSC), Guangzhou, China, 2018 (IEEE, 2018), pp. 386–391. https://doi.org/10.1109/DSC.2018.00062

  28. K. Yehuda, R. Bell and C. Volinsky, “Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems,” Computer 4 (8), 30–37 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2009.263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. X. Yi, L. Hong, E. Zhong, N. N. Liu, and S. Rajan, “Beyond clicks. dwell time for personalization,” in Proc. of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Foster City, Calif., 2014 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2014), pp. 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1145/2645710.2645724

  30. Q. Zhang, Y. Gong, Y. Guo, and X. Huang, “Retweet behavior prediction using hierarchical Dirichlet process,” Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell. 29, 403–409 (2015). https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/9152

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China no. 61672272; Key scientific research platform of Guangdong Provincial University no. 2020ZDZX3033; Scientific and Technological Project of Zhanjiang nos. 2020B01272, 2020B01252; Lingnan Normal University Scientific and Technological Project of YB2105; the project of human social science of Guangdong Provincial no. GD20XXW05.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui Zhang.

Ethics declarations

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

This article is a completely original work of its authors; it has not been published before and will not be sent to other publications until the PRIA Editorial Board decides not to accept it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Rui Zhang. She received the Doctor’s degree at the Department of Human Sciences, majoring Japanese Language Education, Tokyo Metropolitan University in Japan in 2018. She is an university lecturer at School of Foreign Studies, Lingnan Normal University. She is working in Lingnan Normal University. Her main research area covers information integration, machine translation.

Yong-Heng Chen. He received the PhD degree at the Department of Computer Science and Technology, Jilin University in 2012. Since August 2018, he is a professor at School of Information Engineering, Lingnan Normal University. His current main research interests include data mining, web intelligence, and ontology engineering and information integration. He is a Member of System Software Committee of China’s Computer Federation. More than 20 papers of him were published in journals or international conferences.

Chun-yan Yin. She obtained the BS degree from Harbin Normal University. She is an university lecturer at Business School, Lingnan Normal University. Main research area covers database theory, machine learning, data mining, and granular computing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chunyan Yin, Zhang, R. & Chen, Y. Evolutionary Poisson Factorization Based Multiple Trust Relationships. Pattern Recognit. Image Anal. 32, 218–227 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054661822010126

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054661822010126

Keywords:

Navigation