Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical and variational solutions of the dipolar Gross-Pitaevskii equation in reduced dimensions

  • Physics of Cold Trapped Atoms
  • Published:
Laser Physics

Abstract

We suggest a simple Gaussian Lagrangian variational scheme for the reduced time-dependent quasi-one-and quasi-two-dimensional Gross-Pitaevskii (GP) equations of a dipolar Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) in cigar and disk configurations, respectively. The variational approximation for stationary states and breathing oscillation dynamics in reduced dimensions agrees well with the numerical solution of the GP equation even for moderately large short-range and dipolar nonlinearities. The Lagrangian variational scheme also provides much physical insight about soliton formation in dipolar BEC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Dalfovo, S. Giorgin, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 463 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. P. W. Courteille, V. S. Bagnato, and V. I. Yukalov, Laser Phys. 11, 659 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Cheng and S. K. Adhikari, Laser Phys. Lett. 7, 824 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. V. I. Yukalov, Laser Phys. Lett. 8, 485 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. V. I. Yukalov and V. S. Bagnato, Laser Phys. Lett. 6, 399 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. V. I. Yukalov and E. P. Yukalova, Laser Phys. Lett. 6, 235 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. A. Seman, E. A. L. Henn, R. F. Shiozaki, et al., Laser Phys. Lett. 8, 691 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. W. Xiong and B. Wu, Laser Phys. Lett. 8, 398 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. V. I. Yukalov, Laser Phys. Lett. 7, 467 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. L. Salasnich, F. Ancilotto, and F. Toigo, Laser Phys. Lett. 7, 78 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. V. I. Yukalov and E. P. Yukalova, Laser Phys. 21, 1448 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. L. Tomio, M. T. Yamashita, T. Frederico, and F. Bringas, Laser Phys. 21, 1464 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. T. D. Gra, F. E. A. dos Santos, and A. Pelster, Laser Phys. 21, 1459 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. L. Chen, S. W. Bi, and B. Z. Lu, Laser Phys. 21, 1202 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Z.-B. Lu, J.-S. Chen, and J.-R. Li, Laser Phys. 20, 910 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. B. S. Marangoni, C. R. Menegatti, and L. G. Marcassa, Laser Phys. 20, 557 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. I. Vidanovic, A. Balaz, H. Al-Jibbouri, and A. Pelster, Phys. Rev., Ser. A 84, 013618 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Muruganandam and S. K. Adhikari, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 1888 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. S. K. Adhikari and P. Muruganandam, J. Phys., Ser. B 35, 2831 (2002).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Görlitz, J. M. Vogels, A. E. Leanhardt, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 130402 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. L. Salasnich, A. Parola, and L. Reatto, Phys. Rev., Ser. A 65, 043614 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. C. A. G. Buitrago and S. K. Adhikari, J. Phys., Ser. B 42, 215306 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Münoz Mateo and V. Delgado, Phys. Rev., Ser. A 77, 013617 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. V. M. Pérez-García, H. Michinel, J. I. Cirac, et al., Phys. Rev., Ser. A 56, 1424 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. T. Lahaye, C. Menotti, L. Santos, et al., Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, 126401 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. T. Koch, T. Lahaye, J. Metz, et al., Nature Phys. 4, 218 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. T. Lahaye, T. Koch, B. Fröhlich, et al., Nature 448, 672 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. A. Griesmaier, J. Stuhler, T. Koch, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 250402 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. S. H. Youn, M. W. Lu, U. Ray, and B. L. Lev, Phys. Rev., Ser. A 82, 043425 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Lu, N. Q. Burdick, Seo Ho Youn, and B. L. Lev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 190401 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. C. I. Hancox, S. C. Doret, M. T. Hummon, et al., Nature 431, 281 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. J. J. McClelland and J. L. Hanssen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 143005 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. J. Deiglmayr, A. Grochola, M. Repp, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 133004 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. I. Tikhonenkov, B. A. Malomed, and A. Vardi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 090406 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. K. Góral and L. Santos, Phys. Rev., Ser. A 66, 023613 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. S. Yi and L. You, Phys. Rev., Ser. A 63, 053607 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. S. Yi and L. You, Phys. Rev., Ser. A 61, 041604 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. P. Muruganandam, R. Kishor Kumar, and S. K. Adhikari, J. Phys., Ser. B 43, 205305 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. P. Muruganandam and S. K. Adhikari, J. Phys., Ser. B 44, 121001 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. N. G. Parker, C. Ticknor, A. M. Martin, and D. H. J. O’Dell, Phys. Rev., Ser. A 79, 013617 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. R. M. Wilson and J. L. Bohn, Phys. Rev., Ser. A 83, 023623 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. M. Asad-uz-Zaman and D. Blume, Phys. Rev., Ser. A 83, 033616 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. D. C. E. Bortolotti, S. Ronen, J. L. Bohn, and D. Blume, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 160402 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. S. Ronen, D. C. E. Bortolotti, D. Blume, and J. L. Bohn, Phys. Rev., Ser. A 74, 033611 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. S. Sinha and L. Santos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 140406 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. F. Deuretzbacher, J. C. Cremon, and S. M. Reimann, Phys. Rev., Ser. A 81, 063616 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. U. R. Fischer, Phys. Rev., Ser. A 73, 031602 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. P. Pedri and L. Santos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 200404 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. C. Ticknor, R. M. Wilson, and J. L. Bohn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 065301 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. R. Nath, P. Pedri, and L. Santos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 050401 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. S. Inouye, M. R. Andrews, J. Stenger, et al., Nature 392, 151 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. S. Stringari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2360 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Text © Astro, Ltd., 2012.

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muruganandam, P., Adhikari, S.K. Numerical and variational solutions of the dipolar Gross-Pitaevskii equation in reduced dimensions. Laser Phys. 22, 813–820 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054660X12040135

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054660X12040135

Keywords

Navigation