Advertisement

Laser Physics

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 1276–1281 | Cite as

Influence of pre-heat treatment and different light-curing units on Vickers hardness of a microhybrid composite resin

  • E. G. Saade
  • M. C. Bandeca
  • A. N. S. RastelliEmail author
  • V. S. Bagnato
  • S. T. Porto-Neto
Laser Methods in Chemistry, Biology, and Medicine

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the hardness of a dental composite resin submitted to temperature changes before photo-activation with two light-curing unite (LCUs). Five samples (4 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness) for each group were made with pre-cure temperatures of 37, 54, and 60°C. The samples were photo-activated with a conventional quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH) and blue LED LCUs during 40 s. The hardness Vickers test (VHN) was performed on the top and bottom surfaces of the samples. According to the interaction between light-curing unit and different pre-heating temperatures of composite resin, only the light-curing unit provided influences on the mean values of initial Vickers hardness. The light-curing unit based on blue LED showed hardness mean values more homogeneous between the top and bottom surfaces. The hardness mean values were not statistically significant difference for the pre-cure temperature used. According to these results, the pre-heating of the composite resin provide no influence on Vickers hardness mean values, however the blue LED showed a cure more homogeneous than QTH LCU.

PACS numbers

47.54.Fj 62.20.Qp 68.35.Gy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. L. Bowen, J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 66, 57 (1963).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Peutzfeldt, Eur. J. Oral. Sci. 105, 97 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Peutzfeldt, A. Sahafi, and E. Asmussen, Dent. Mater. 16, 330 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    U. Lohbauer, C. Rahiotis, N. Kramer, A. Petschelt, and G. Eliades, Dent. Mater. 21, 608 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. A. Rueggeberg, Quitessence Int. 24, 391 (1993).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. D. Cook, and P. M. Standish, Aust. Dent. J. 28, 307 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Friedman, and R. Hassan, J. Prosthet. Dent. 52, 504 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Takamizu, B. K. Moore, J. C. Setcos, and R. W. Phillips, Oper. Dent. 13, 173 (1988)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. G. Craig, and J. M. Powers, Restorative Dental Materials, 11th ed. (St. Louis, 2002).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Schattenberg, D. Lichtenberg, E. Stender, B. Willershausen, and C. P. Ernst, Dent. Maler. 24, 1043 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. Fujita, N. Nishiyama, K. Nemoto, T. Okada, and T. Ikemi, Dent. Mater. 24, 403 (2005).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. W. Stansbury, J. Esthet. Dent. 12, 300 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. J. Blankenau, W. P. Kelsey, G. L. Powell, G. O. Shearer, W. W. Barkmeier, and W. T. Cavel, Am. J. Dent. 4, 40 (1991).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. L. Ferracane, J. C. Mitchem, J. R. Condon, and R. Todd, J. Dent. Res. 76, 1508 (19917).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. N. S. Rastelli, D. P. Jacomassi, and V. S. Bagnato, Laser Phys. 18, 1074 (2008).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. Keogh, N. J. Ray, C. D. Lynch, F. M. Burke, and A. Hannigan, Eur. J. Prosthodont. Rest. Dent. 12, 177 (2004).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Imazato, J. F. McCabe, H. Tarumi, A. Ehara, and S. Ebisu, Dent. Mater. 17, 178 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. L. Ferracane, Dent. Mater. 1, 11 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. L. Ferracane and E. H. Greener, J. Dent. Res. 63, 1093 (1984).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    L. G. Lovell, H Lu, J. E. Elliot, J. W. Stansbury, and C. N. Bowman, Dent. Mater. 17, 504 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. Friedman, Contemp. Esthet. Restorat. Pract. 7, 46 (2003).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    G. Freedman and I. Krejci, Compendium 25, 95 (2004).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Friedman, US Patent 6236020 (2001).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. Littlejohn, S. C. Greer, A. D. Puckett, and J. Firtchie, J. Dent Res. 82 (Spec. Iss. A), 0944 (2003).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    International Organization for Standardization, ISO 4049, Dentistry—Polymer—Based Filling, Restorative and Luting Materials, 3rd ed. (ISO, Geneva, 2000).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    L. Wang, P. H. P. D’Alpino, L. G. Lopes, and J. C. Pereira, J. Appl. Oral Sci. 11, 162 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    F. A. Rueggeberg and R. G. Craig, J. Dent. Res. 67, 932 (1988).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. Peutzfeldt and E. Asmussen, J. Dent. Res. 84, 659 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    J. Manhart, K. H. Kunzelmann, H. Y. Chen, and R. Hickel, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. (ApplBiomater). 53, 353 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. Yearn, Int. Dent. J. 35, 218 (1985).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    C. Hasler, B. Zimmerli, and A. Lussi, Operat. Dent. 31, 354 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    A. Lindberg, A. Peutzfeldt, and J. W. V. Dijken, Clin. Oral. Invest. 9, 71 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    D. A. M. P. Malta, A. A. M. Kreidler, G. E. Villa, M. F. de Andrade, C. R. Fontana, and R. F. Z. Lizarelli, Laser Phys. Lett. 4, 153 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Z. Tarle, A. Meniga, A. Knezevic, J. Sutalo, M. Ristic, and G. Pichler, J. Oral Rehabil. 29, 662 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    D. L. Hussey, P. A. Biagionit, and J. Lamey, J. Dent. 23, 267 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    S. Bouillaguet, G. Caillot, J. Forchelet, M. L. Cattani, J. C. Wataha, and I. Krejci, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part. B: Appl. Biomater. B 72, 260 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    A. N. S. Rastelli, D. P. Jacomassi, and V. S. Bagnato. Laser Phys. 18, 1003 (2008).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    E. K. Hansen and E. Asmussen, Scand. J. Dent. Res. 101, 62 (1993).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    A. C. Obici, M. A. C. Sinhoreti, E. Frollini, L. Correr-Sobrinho, M. F. Góes, and G. E. P. Henriques, Polymer. Testing. 25, 282 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    L. C. Ramp, J. C. Broome, and M. H. Ramp, Am. J. Dent. 19, 31 (2006).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    P. C. G. Silva, S. T. Porto-Neto, R. F. Z. Lizarelli, and V. S. Bagnato, Laser Phys. Lett. 5, 220 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    H. Jelínková, T. Dolstálová, M. Nemec, P. Koranda, M. Miyagi, K. Iwai, Y.-W. Shi, and Y. Matsuura, Laser Phys. Lett. 4, 835 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    J. E. Elliott, L. G. Lovell, and C. N. Bowman, Dent. Mater. 17, 221 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    R. Trushkowsky, Dentistry Today/ the Nation’s Leading Clinical News Magazine for Dentists 21, (2002).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    M. Trujillo, S. M. Newman, and J. W. Stansbury, Dent. Mater. 20, 766 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    G. Freedman, Private Dentistry 8, 111 (2003).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    M. Daronch, F. A. Rueggeberg, and M. F. De Goes, J. Dent. Res. 84, 663 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. G. Saade
    • 1
  • M. C. Bandeca
    • 1
  • A. N. S. Rastelli
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • V. S. Bagnato
    • 2
  • S. T. Porto-Neto
    • 1
  1. 1.Araraquara School of Dentistry, Department of Restorative DentistryUniversity of São Paulo StateAraraquara-SPBrazil
  2. 2.Physics Institute of São Paulo University of São PauloSão Carlos-SPBrazil

Personalised recommendations