Abstract
Frictional sliding behavior along a tectonic fault is governed by self-organization of the medium in the narrow central zone of the fault. Heterogeneous surfaces of rock blocks have specific contact spots between different-sized asperities. The structural and frictional properties of these spots determine the occurrence of various slip regimes along the fault: from continuous creep and slow slip events to dynamic rupture. Due to the impossibility of direct observations at seismogenic depths, it is critically important to obtain reliable information about the characteristics of the contact spots on the fault slip surface. In this work, data from the earthquake catalog for Northern California are used to reveal structural features of slip zones in different segments of the San Andreas and Calaveras faults on scales from 0.1 to 10 km. It is shown that linear elongated clusters are formed in the contact region, which are separated by a characteristic distance from 4 to 9 km. The clusters present a system of contact spots with a statistically self-similar structure and a self-similarity index from 0.7 to 1.6. Analysis showed that the characteristic size of self-similar clusters is about 1 km, and a coseismic rupture that originates at the same contact spot of a cluster can cover different spatial scales from meters to kilometers.
REFERENCES
Kocharyan, G.G., Geomechanics of Faults, Moscow: GEOS, 2016.
Scholz, C.H., The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
Saffer, D. and Wallace, L., The Frictional, Hydrologic, Metamorphic and Thermal Habitat of Shallow Slow Earthquakes, Nat. Geosci., 2015, vol. 8, pp. 594–600. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2490
Burgmann, R., The Geophysics, Geology and Mechanics of Slow Fault Slip, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 2018, vol. 495, pp. 112–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.04.062
Yabe, S. and Ide, S., Slip-Behavior Transitions of a Heterogeneous Linear Fault, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 2017, vol. 122, pp. 387–410. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013132
Kocharyan, G.G., Ostapchuk, A.A., and Pavlov, D.V., Fault Sliding Modes—Governing, Evolution and Transformation. Multiscale Biomechanics and Tribology of Inorganic and Organic Systems, in Springer Tracts in Mechanical Engineering, Ostermeyer, G.P., Popov, V.L., Shilko, E.V., and Vasiljeva, O.S., Eds., Cham: Springer, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60124-9_15
Scholz, C.H. and Campos, J., The Seismic Coupling of Subduction Zones Revisited, J. Geophys. Res. B, 2012, vol. 117, p. 05310. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB009003
Tal, Y. and Hager, B.H., The Slip Behavior and Source Parameters for Spontaneous Slip Events on Rough Faults Subjected to Slow Tectonic Loading, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 2018, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 1810–1823. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014737
Ye, L., Kanamori, H., and Lay, T., Global Variations of Large Megathrust Earthquake Rupture Characteristics, Sci. Adv., 2018, vol. 4, article eaao4915.
Cirella, A., Piatanesi, A., Tinti, E., Chini, M., and Cocco, M., Complexity of the Rupture Process during the 2009 L’Aquila, Italy, Earthquake, Geophys. J. Int., 2012, vol. 190, pp. 607–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05505.x
Gusev, A.A., High-Frequency Radiation from an Earthquake Fault: A Review and a Hypothesis of Fractal Rupture Front Geometry, Pure Appl. Geophys., 2013, vol. 170, pp. 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-012-0455-y
Kocharyan, G.G., Kishkina, S.B., and Ostapchuk, A.A., Seismic Picture of a Fault Zone. What Can Be Gained from the Analysis of Fine Patterns of Spatial Distribution of Weak Earthquake Centers? Geodyn. Tectonophys., 2010, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 419–440.
Ross, Z.E., Cochran, E.S., Trugman, D.T., and Smith, J.D., 3D Fault Architecture Controls the Dynamism of Earthquake Swarms, Science, 2020, vol. 368, no. 6497, pp. 1357–1361. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb0779
Waldhauser, F. and Schaff, D.P., Large-Scale Relocation of Two Decades of Northern California Seismicity Using Cross-Correlation and Double-Difference Methods, J. Geophys. Res. B, 2008, vol. 113, p. 08311. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005479
Wiemer, S., A Software Package to Analyze Seismicity: ZMAP, Seismol. Res. Lett., 2001, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.72.3.373
Gutenberg, R. and Richter, C.F., Frequency of Earthquakes in California, Bullet. Seismol. Soc. Am., 1944, vol. 34. pp. 185–188.
Seminskii, K.Zh., Internal Structure of Continental Fault Zones. Tectonophysical Aspect, Novosibirsk: Izd. SO RAN, Geo, 2003.
Savage, H.M. and Brodsky, E.E., Collateral Damage: Evolution with Displacement of Fracture Distribution and Secondary Fault Strands in Fault Damage Zones, J. Geophys. Res. B, 2011, vol. 116, p. 03405. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB007665
Clark, P.J. and Evans, F.J., Distance to Nearest Neighbor as a Measure of Spatial Relationships in Populations, Ecology, 1954, vol. 35, pp. 445–453. https://doi.org/10.2307/1931034
Hentschet, H. and Procaccia, I., The Infinite Number of Generalized Dimensions of Fractals and Strange Attractors, Physica D, 1983, vol. 8, pp. 435–444.
Seno, T., Fractal Asperities, Invasion of Barriers, and Interplate Earthquakes, Earth Planets Space, 2003, vol. 55, pp. 649–665. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352472
Mykulyak, S.V., Hierarchical Block Model for Earthquakes, Phys. Rev. E, 2018, vol. 97, p. 062130. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.062130
Kocharyan, G.G. and Kishkina, S.B., The Physical Mesomechanics of the Earthquake Source, Phys. Mesomech., 2021, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1029959921040019
Brune, J.N., Tectonic Stress and Spectra of Seismic Shear Waves from Earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., 1970, vol. 75, pp. 4997–5009. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB075i026p04997
Allmann, B.P. and Shearer, P.M., Spatial and Temporal Stress Drop Variations in Small Earthquakes near Parkfield, California, J. Geophys. Res. B, 2007, vol. 112, p. 04305. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004395
Kovalev, A., Yazhao, Z., Hui, C., and Meng, Y., A Concept of the Effective Surface Profile to Predict the Roughness Parameters of Worn Surface, Front. Mech. Eng., 2019, vol. 5, p. 31. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2019.00031
Chen, X., Madden, A.S., Bickmore, B.R., and Reches, Z., Dynamic Weakening by Nanoscale Smoothing during High-Velocity Fault Slip, Geology, 2013, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 739–742. https://doi.org/10.1130/G34169.1
Mukhopadhyay, M., Biswas, U., Mandal, N., and Misra, S., On the Development of Shear Surface Roughness, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 2019, vol. 124, pp. 1273–1293. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016677
Candela, T., Renard, F., Klinger, Y., Mair, K., Schmittbuhl, J., and Brodsky, E.E., Roughness of Fault Surfaces over Nine Decades of Length Scales, J. Geophys. Res. B, 2012, vol. 117, p. 08409. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB009041
Turcotte, D.L., Fractals and Fragmentation, J. Geophys. Res. B, 1986, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 1921–1926.
Ide, S., Frequent Observations of Identical Onsets of Large and Small Earthquakes, Nature, 2019, vol. 573, pp. 112–116. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1508-5
Makarov, P.V., Evolutionary Nature of Destruction of Solids and Media, Phys. Mesomech., 2007, vol. 10, no. 3–4, pp. 134–147.
Kocharyan, G.G. and Kulyukin, A.M., Study of Caving Features for Underground Workings in a Rock Mass of Block Structure with Dynamic Action. Part II. Mechanical Properties of Interblock Gaps, J. Mining Sci., 1994, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 437–446.
Huang, J. and Turcotte, D.L., Fractal Distributions of Stress and Strength and Variations of b-Value, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 1988, vol. 91, no. 1–2, pp. 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(88)90164-1
Majumdar, A. and Bhushan, B., Fractal Model of Elastic-Plastic Contact between Rough Surfaces, ASME. J. Tribol., 1991, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 1–11.
Kemeny, J.M. and Hagaman, R.M., An Asperity Model to Simulate Rupture along Heterogeneous Fault Surfaces, Pure Appl. Geophys., 1992, vol. 138, pp. 549–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876338
Popov, V.L., Contact Mechanics and Friction. Physical Principles and Applications, Heidelberg: Springer, 2010.
Métois, M., Vigny, C., and Socquet, A., Interseismic Coupling, Megathrust Earthquakes and Seismic Swarms along the Chilean Subduction Zone (38°–18°S), Pure Appl. Geophys., 2016, vol. 173, pp. 1431–1449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-016-1280-5
Plata-Martinez, R., Ide, S., Shinohara, M., Garcia, E.S., Mizuno, N., Dominguez, L.A., Taira, T., Yamashita, Y., Toh, A., Yamada, T., Real, J., Husker, A., Cruz-Atienza, V.M., and Ito, Y., Shallow Slow Earthquakes to Decipher Future Catastrophic Earthquakes in the Guerrero Seismic Gap, Nat. Commun., 2021, vol. 12, p. 3976. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24210-9
Panin, V.E., Synergetic Principles of Physical Mesomechanics, Phys. Mesomech., 2000, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 5–34.
Besedina, A.N., Kishkina, S.B., and Kocharyan, G.G., Source Parameters of Microseismic Swarm Events Induced by the Explosion at the Korobkovskoye Iron Ore Deposit, Izv. Phys. Sol. Earth, 2021, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 348–365.
Ruzhich, V.V., Vakhromeev, A.G., Levina, E.A., Sverkunov, S.A., and Shilko, E.V., Control of Seismic Activity in Tectonic Fault Zones Using Vibrations and Fluid Injection in Deep Wells, Phys. Mesomech., 2021, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1029959921010124
Funding
The study was financially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project No. 19-05-00378 (G.G. Kocharyan—problem formulation, approach development, analysis and discussion, writing), the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 20-77-10087 (A.A. Ostapchuk—formulation of the problem of seismological data analysis, development and implementation of the fractal analysis algorithm, analysis and discussion, writing), and the Program of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Fizicheskaya Mezomekhanika, 2022, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 94–105.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kocharyan, G.G., Ostapchuk, A.A. Mesostructure of a Tectonic Fault Slip Zone. Phys Mesomech 26, 82–92 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1029959923010095
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1029959923010095