Advertisement

Doklady Earth Sciences

, Volume 476, Issue 1, pp 1016–1020 | Cite as

The Vendian Vorogovka Group of Yenisei Ridge: Chemostratigraphy and results of U–Pb dating of detrital zircons

  • I. A. Vishnevskaya
  • E. F. Letnikova
  • A. I. Proshenkin
  • A. V. Maslov
  • V. V. Blagovidov
  • D. V. Metelkin
  • N. S. Priyatkina
Geology

Abstract

Application of the method of isotope stratigraphy showed that the 87Sr/86Sr ratio in the least altered carbonate rocks of the Severnaya Rechka and Sukhaya Rechka formations in the Vorogovka Group of Yenisei Ridge ranges from 0.70813 to 0.70828, and δ13C varies from –0.7 to +1.8‰. Comparison of these data with similar data for the Late Precambrian sequences from other regions provides evidence for the Vendian age of the Vorogovka Group. This is supported by the results of LA ICP-MS U–Pb dating of detrital zircons from sandstone of the Severnaya Rechka Formation, which is the basal level of the group: the mid-weight age of the youngest zircon population is 584 ± 3 Ma.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    V. A. Vernikovsky, A. Yu. Kazansky, N. Yu. Matushkin, D. V. Metelkin, and Yu. K. Sovetov, Russ. Geol. Geophys. 50 (4), 380–393 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. A. Semikhatov, Riphaean and Lower Cambrian of Yenisei Ridge (USSR Acad. Sci., Moscow, 1962) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. S. Postel’nikov, Geosynclinal Evolution of Yenisei Ridge in Late Precambrian (Nauka, Moscow, 1980) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. A. Postnikov, A. A. Terleev, A. B. Kuznetsov, B. B. Kochnev, A. D. Nozhkin, and A. M. Stanevich, in Geodynamic Evolution of Lithosphere of Central Asian Mobile Belt (Inst. of the Earth’s Crust Siberian Branch Russ. Acad. Sci., Irkutsk, 2008), Vol. 2, pp. 53–55 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. P. Halverson, B. P. Wade, M. T. Hurtgen, and K. M. Barovich, Precambrian Res. 182, 337–350 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. B. Kuznetsov, M. A. Semikhatov, and I. M. Gorokhov, Stratigr. Geol. Correl. 22 (6), 553–575 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y. Sawaki, T. Ohno, M. Tahata, T. Komiya, T. Hirata, S. Maruyama, B. F. Windley, J. Han, D. Shu, and Y. Li, Precambrian Res. 176, 46–64 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    I. A. Vishnevskaya, B. B. Kochnev, E. F. Letnikova, V. Yu. Kiseleva, and N. I. Pisareva, Dokl. Earth Sci. 449 (1), 298–302 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. A. Bowring, J. P. Grotzinger, C. E. Isachsen, A. H. Knoll, S. M. Pelechaty, and P. Kolosov, Science 261, 1293–1298 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. A. Vishnevskaya
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. F. Letnikova
    • 1
  • A. I. Proshenkin
    • 1
  • A. V. Maslov
    • 1
    • 3
  • V. V. Blagovidov
    • 2
  • D. V. Metelkin
    • 2
    • 4
  • N. S. Priyatkina
    • 5
  1. 1.Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Novosibirsk State UniversityNovosibirskRussia
  3. 3.Zavaritsky Institute of Geology and Geochemistry, Ural BranchRussian Academy of SciencesYekaterinburgRussia
  4. 4.Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia
  5. 5.University of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia

Personalised recommendations