Doklady Earth Sciences

, Volume 476, Issue 1, pp 1099–1104 | Cite as

Geochemistry of obsidian from Krasnoe Lake on the Chukchi Peninsula (Northeastern Siberia)

  • V. K. Popov
  • A. V. Grebennikov
  • Ya. V. Kuzmin
  • M. D. Glascock
  • E. A. Nozdrachev
  • S. Yu. Budnitsky
  • I. E. Vorobey


This report considers features of the geochemical composition of obsidian from beach sediments of Krasnoe Lake along the lower course of the Anadyr River, as well as from lava–pyroclastic rocks constituting the lake coastal outcrops and the surrounding branches of Rarytkin Ridge. The two geochemical types of obsidian, for the first time distinguished and researched, correspond in their chemical composition to lavas and ignimbrite-like tuffs of rhyolites from the Rarytkin area. The distinguished types represent the final stage of acidic volcanism in the West Kamchatkan–Koryak volcanic belt. It was assumed that the accumulation of obsidian in coastal pebble beds was caused by the erosion of extrusive domes and pyroclastic flows. The geochemical studies of obsidian artifacts from archeological sites of the regions of the Sea of Okhotsk, the Kolyma River, and the Chukchi Peninsula along with the correlation of geological and archeological samples show that Krasnoe Lake was an important source of “archeological” obsidian in Northeastern Siberia.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    V. V. Nasedkin, Acid Volcanism and Water-Containing Glasses of the USSR North-East (Nauka, Moscow, 1983) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. C. Cook, Arct. Anthropol. 32 (1), 92–100 (1995).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. N. Dikov, Archeological Monuments in Kamchatka, Chukotka and Upper Kolyma (Nauka, Moscow, 1977) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Yoshitani, S. Slobodin, T. Tomoda, et al., Proc. Archaeol. Mus. Kokugakuin Univ., No. 29, 1–21 (2013).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. B. Slobodin, in Ecology of Ancient and Traditional Societies (Vektor-Buk, Tyumen, 2007), pp. 136–140.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. I. Fedorov, N. I. Filatova, and A. I. Dvoryankin, Tikhookean. Geol. 15 (3), 3–13 (1996).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. I. Fedorov, D. V. Kovalenko, and O. A. Ageeva, Geochem. Int. 49 (8), 768–792 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. V. Kuzmin, R. J. Speakman, M. D. Glascock, et al., J. Archaeol. Sci. 35, 2179–2187 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. G. Shirinyan, Tr. Lab. Paleovulkanol., No. 2, 200–210 (1963).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. D. Glascock, E. Braswell, and R. H. Cobean, Archaeological Obsidian Studies: Method and Theory (Plenum Press, New York, 1998), pp. 15–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. R. Taylor and S. M. McLennan, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 301, 381–399 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. S. Sun and W. F. McDonough, Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ. 42, 313–345 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. V. Ignat’ev, T. A. Velivetskaya, and S. Yu. Budnitskii, J. Anal. Chem. 65, 1347–1355 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. K. Popov
    • 1
  • A. V. Grebennikov
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ya. V. Kuzmin
    • 3
    • 4
  • M. D. Glascock
    • 5
  • E. A. Nozdrachev
    • 1
  • S. Yu. Budnitsky
    • 1
  • I. E. Vorobey
    • 6
  1. 1.Far Eastern Geological Institute, Far East BranchRussian Academy of SciencesVladivostokRussia
  2. 2.Far Eastern Federal UniversityVladivostokRussia
  3. 3.Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia
  4. 4.Tomsk State UniversityTomskRussia
  5. 5.University of Missouri Research ReactorColumbiaUSA
  6. 6.Magadan Regional Museum of Local LoreMagadanRussia

Personalised recommendations