Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of the Results of Simulation and Measurements of Interference Patterns of Coherent Transition Radiation

  • Published:
Journal of Surface Investigation: X-ray, Synchrotron and Neutron Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results of a comparison of the autocorrelation functions of coherent transition radiation, which are obtained experimentally using the microtron of Tomsk Polytechnic University and by simulation methods, are discussed. The conditions of the experiment and the mathematical basis of the simulation are described in detail. The comparison shows good agreement between the experimental and simulated data. It is demonstrated that the autocorrelation function of transition radiation depends on the temporal structure of the electron beam and can be used as a precision method for measuring the delay time between electron bunches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

REFERENCES

  1. A. Aryshev, R. Ainsworth, T. Aumeyr, M. Bergamaschi, S. T. Boogert, P. Karataev, R. Kieffer, K. Kruchinin, T. Lefevre, S. Mazzoni, L. Nevay, N. Terunuma, and J. Urakawa, J. Instrum 15, 01020 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/15/01/P01020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Mihalcea, C. L. Bohn, U. Happek, and P. Piot, Phys. Rev. Spec. Top.—Accel. Beams 9, 082801 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.9.082801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. P. Potylitsyn and R. O. Rezaev, Poverkhn.: Rentgenovskie, Sinkhrotronnye Neitr. Issled., No. 3, 77 (2006).

  4. I. E. Vnukov, Yu. A. Goponov, S. A. Laktionova, R. A. Shatokhin, K. Sumitani, and Y. Takabayashi, J. Surf. Invest.: X-ray, Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 14, 578 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1027451020030416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Behrens, F.-J. Decker, Y. Ding, V. A. Dolgashev, J. Frisch, Z. Huang, P. Krejcik, H. Loos, A. Lutman, T. J. Maxwell, J. Turner, J. Wang, and M.-H. Wang, J. Welch, and J. Wu, Nat. Commun. 5, 3762 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Berden, S. P. Jamison, A. M. MacLeod, W. A. Gillespie, B. Redlich, and A. F. G. van Der Meer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 114802 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.114802

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. G. A. Naumenko, A. P. Potylitsyn, P. V. Karataev, M. A. Shipulya, and V. V. Bleko, JETP Lett. 106, 127 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364017140089

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Naumenko, A. Potylitsyn, M. Shevelev, P. Karataev, M. Shipulya, and V. Bleko, J. Instrum. 13, C04008 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/13/04/C04007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. H. Martin and E. Puplett, Infrared Phys. 10, 105 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0891(70)90006-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D. A. Shkitov, G. A. Naumenko, M. V. Shevelev, A. P. Potylitsyn, H. Deng, and X. Wang, J. Surf. Invest.: X-ray, Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 7, 784 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1134/S102745101304037X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. G. A. Naumenko, A. P. Potylitsyn, M. V. Shevelev, D. A. Shkitov, and Yu. A. Popov, Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 18, 244 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D. A. Shkitov, A. P. Potylitsyn, A. S. Aryshev, and J. Urakawa, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 517, 012024 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/517/1/012024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Antipov, C. Jing, M. Fedurin, W. Gai, A. Kanareykin, K. Kusche, P. Schoessow, V. Yakimenko, and A. Zholents, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 144801 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.144801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Marinelli, D. Ratner, A. A. Lutman, et al., Nature Commun. 6, 6369 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. P. Piot, Y.-E. Sun, T. J. Maxwell, J. Ruan, A. H. Lumpkin, M. M. Rihaoui, and R. Thurman-Keup, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 261501 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3604017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Shen, Xi. Yang, G. L. Carr, Y. Hidaka, J. B. Murphy, and X. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 204801 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.204801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Toktaganova, D. Shkitov, M. Shevelev, and S. Stuchebrov, Proceedings of RuPAC-2021 Conference (Alushta, 2021), p. 413. https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-RuPAC2021-WEPSC36

  18. G. A. Naumenko, A. P. Potylitsyn, M. V. Shevelev, D. A. Shkitov, K. E. Popov, and A. V. Vukolov, JETP Lett. 111, 255 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364020050094

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. P. Karataev, G. Naumenko, A. Potylitsyn, M. Shevelev, and K. Artyomov, Results Phys. 33, 105079 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.105079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D. A. Shkitov, Proceedings of RuPAC-2018 Conference (Protvino, 2018), p. 510. https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-RUPAC2018-THPSC56

  21. D. V. Karlovets and A. P. Potylitsyn, Phys. Lett. A 373, 1988 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2009.03.060

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. G. A. Naumenko, Adv. Mater. Res. 1084, 138 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1084.138

  23. Coherent Transition Radiation from Bunches of Charged Particle (2020). http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/CoherentTransitionRadiationFromBunches-OfChargedParticles. Accessed June 30, 2022.

  24. Wolfram Language (2022). https://www.wolfram.com/language. Accessed June 10, 2022.

  25. B. N. Kalinin, G. A. Naumenko, A. P. Potylitsyn, G. A. Saruev, L. G. Sukhikh, and V. A. Cha, JETP Lett. 84, 110 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to the employees of Tomsk Polytechnic University (Tomsk, Russia), who ensured the daily operation of the high-performance computer cluster.

Funding

This study was supported by Tomsk Polytechnic University (Tomsk, Russia) within Development program no. Priority-2030-NIP/IZ-005-0000-2022.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050, Tomsk, Russia

    D. A. Shkitov, M. M. Toktaganova, G. A. Naumenko & M. V. Shevelev

Authors
  1. D. A. Shkitov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. M. Toktaganova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. A. Naumenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. V. Shevelev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to D. A. Shkitov or M. M. Toktaganova.

Ethics declarations

We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by O. Kadkin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shkitov, D.A., Toktaganova, M.M., Naumenko, G.A. et al. Comparison of the Results of Simulation and Measurements of Interference Patterns of Coherent Transition Radiation. J. Surf. Investig. 17, 251–257 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S102745102301038X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S102745102301038X

Keywords:

Search

Navigation