Skip to main content
Log in

On the Effect of the Surface State and Geometry of the Discharge- Chamber Edges and Sizes of Morozov’s Stationary Plasma Thruster upon its Long-Term Operation

  • Published:
Journal of Surface Investigation: X-ray, Synchrotron and Neutron Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results of long-term tests of Morozov’s stationary plasma thrusters are presented. It is revealed how the surface state and geometry of the discharge chamber’s edges influence the thruster’s parameters. It is shown that, during the ground tests of thrusters with cylindrical geometry of the acceleration channel under initial stage of operation, material sputtered from the discharge chambers’ walls is deposited onto the nearanode segment of the walls. Films of deposited material fail during thruster operation causing fragment formation, which jut out towards the discharge volume and disturb the motion of drifting electrons in the area of their acceleration. As a result the thruster reactive force and specific impulse decrease. The way in which the forming fragments influence thruster performance and operation is examined. It is shown that it decreases under long-term operation and significant channel widening since the ion flux to the wall and the quantity of the sputtered material decrease, and since the profile of the walls changes due to their wear and cleaning effect of the discharge. As a result the thruster’s parameters are restored to a level close to the initial one. It is shown that the dynamics of thruster parameters variation in space and during ground tests is different. This means that it is necessary to simulate more properly the conditions of thruster operation in space when conducting ground development tests. Thrusters with a long lifetime should be designed with widening of the acceleration channel beyond the loop which surrounds the magnetic system so that areas of acceleration and the erosion of walls are located in the widened part of the channel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. N. Kozubskii, V. M. Murashko, Yu. P. Rylov, et al., Plasma Phys. Rep. 29 (3), 251 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. V. P. Kim, Tech. Phys. 60 (3), 362 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Yu. Pridannikov, PhD Dissertation in Engineering (Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal Univ., Kaliningrad, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Marchandise, N. Cornu, F. Darnon, and D. Estublier, in Proc. 30th Int. Electric Propulsion Conference (Florence, 2007), IEPC-2007-164.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. De Grys, A. Mathers, B. Welander, and V. Khaums, in Proc. 46th Joint Propulsion Conference (Nashville, 2010), AIAA-2010-6698.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Hofer, H. Kamhavi, D. Herman, et al., in Proc. 30th Int. Symposium on Space Technology and Science; Proc. 34th Int. Electric Propulsion Conference; Proc. 6th Nano-Satellite Symposium (Kobe, 2015), IEPC-2015-186/ISTS-2015-b-186.

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. G. Mikellides, A. Lopes Ortega, R. R. Hofer, et al., in Proc. 30th Int. Symposium on Space Technology and Science; Proc. 34th Int. Electric Propulsion Conference; Proc. 6th Nano-Satellite Symposium (Kobe, 2015), IEPC-2015-254/ISTS-2015-b-254.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. M. Bishaev and V. Kim., Zh. Tekh. Fiz. 48 (9), 1853 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. M. Bishaev and V. Kim, in Plasma Sources and Accelerators (Kharkov Aviation Institute, Kharkov, 1981), Issue 5, p. 3 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. I. Morozov, Prikl. Mat. Tekh. Fiz., No. 3, 19 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. I. Morozov, Introduction into Plasma Dynamics (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2006) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. A. Shagayda, O. A. Gorshkov, and D. A. Tomilin, in Proc. 32nd Int. Electric Propulsion Conference (Wiesbaden, 2011), IEPC-2011-025.

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. P. Kim, D. P. Grdlichko, D. V. Merkur’ev, et al., Vestn. Mosk. Aviats. Inst. im. Sergo Ordzhonikidze 22 (4), 53 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. L. Corey and D. J. Pidgeon, in Proc. 31st Int. Electric Propulsion Conference (Ann Arbor, 2009), IEPC-2009-370.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. A. Arhipov, A. S. Bober, R. Y. Gnizdor, K. N. Kozubsky, A. I. Koryakin, N. A. Maslennikov, and S. Y. Pridannikov, in Proc. 24th Int. Electric Propulsion Conference (Moscow, 1995), IEPC-1995-039.

    Google Scholar 

  16. O. A. Mitrofanova and R. Yu. Gnizdor, in Proc. 33rd Int. Electric Propulsion Conference (Washington, 2013), IEPC-2013-51.

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. A. Arkhipov, A. M. Bishaev, V. M. Gavryushin, et al., RF Patent No. 2030134, Byull. Izobret., No. 6 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. I. Morozov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 163 (36), 1363 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. P. Kim.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.P. Kim, R.Yu. Gnizdor, Yu.M. Yermoshkin, D.V. Merkurev, S.Yu. Pridannikov, 2018, published in Poverkhnost’, 2018, No. 3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, V.P., Gnizdor, R.Y., Yermoshkin, Y.M. et al. On the Effect of the Surface State and Geometry of the Discharge- Chamber Edges and Sizes of Morozov’s Stationary Plasma Thruster upon its Long-Term Operation. J. Surf. Investig. 12, 286–295 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S102745101802009X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S102745101802009X

Keywords

Navigation