Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 416–419 | Cite as

Estimation of the Absorption Coefficient of a Conservative Yellow Substance from Correlations between Hydrooptical Characteristics (a Version)

  • V. I. MankovskiyEmail author


A technique for estimation of the absorption coefficient of a conservative yellow substance (CYS) from correlations between hydrooptical parameters is discussed. CYS absorption in different waters is estimated; the spectral selectivity of CYS absorption is determined. The ratio of CYS to total yellow substance absorption in waters with different chlorophyll concentrations is calculated.


conservative and nonconservative yellow substance absorption, scattering and attenuation coefficients spectral selectivity chlorophyll 



The work was fulfilled in Marine Hydrophysical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, within the State Assignment (theme no. 0827-2018-0002).


The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.


  1. 1.
    O. V. Kopelevich, “Dissolved organic matters,” in Ocean Optics. Vol. 1. Physical Optics of Ocean, Ed. by A.S. Monin (Nauka, Moscow, 1983), p. 157–160 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. I. Man’kovskiy, “Study of the correlation between the absorption coefficient and attenuation factor of directed light in Black Sea waters,” in Proc. VIII Intern. Conf. “Modern Problems of Optics of Natural Waters (Institute of Oceanology RAS, SPb. Branch, SPb., 2015), p. 118–120.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. M. Pope and E. S. Fry, “Absorption spectrum (380–700 nm) of pure water. II. Integration cavity measurements,” Appl. Opt. 36 (33), 8710–8723 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. N. Korchemkina, “Correlation between the scattering coefficient and attenuation factor (λ = 550 nm) in surface waters of the Black Sea” (private report).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Dera, L. Gohs, and B. Wozniak, “Experimental study of the composite parts of the light-beam attenuation process in the waters of the Gulf of Gdansk,” Oceanologia. Wroclaw, Warsawa, Krakow, Gdansk: Polish Academy of Sciences. National Committee on Oceanic research, No. 10, 5–26 (1978).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    I. Levin, M. Darecki, S. Sagan, and T. Radomyslskaya, “Relation between inherent optical properties in the baltic sea for application to the underwater imagin problem,” Oceanologia 55 (1), 11–26 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. P. Sherstynkin, G. P. Kokhanenko, and B. A. Tarashcansky, “Correlations of the hydrooptical properties of Baikal Water,” in Proc. of 4 Inter. Conf. “Current Problems in Optics of Natural Waters” (Nizhny Novgorod, Institute of Applied Physics RAS, 2007), p. 37–40.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    I. M. Levin, “Few-parameter optical models of seawater inherent optical properties,” Fundam. Prikl. Gidrofiz.‎ 7 (3), 9 (2014).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    I. M. Levin and O. V. Kopelevich, “Correlations between the inherent hydrooptical characteristics in the spectral range close to 550 nm,” Oceanology 47 (3), 344–349 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Morel and I. Prieur, “Analysis of variation in ocean color,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 22 (4), 709–722 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. S. Schoonmaker, R. R. Hammond, A. L. Healh, and J. S. Cleveland, “A numerical model for prediction of sublitiral optical visibivility,” Ocean Optics XXII. Soc. Photo-Optic. Instrument. Engin. Bergen 2258, 685–702 (1994).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V.I. Mankovsky, “Parameters of scattering phase functions in tropical Atlantic waters,” Atmos. Ocean. Opt. 31 (6), 604–610 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. I. Mankovskii and P. P. Sherstyankin, “Optical characteristics of Lake Baikal waters and their cross-correlations,” Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 48 (4), 454–462 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. S. Karabashev, “Phytoplankton pigments,” in Ocean Optics. Vol. 1. Physical Optics of Ocean, Ed. by A.S. Monin (Nauka, Moscow, 1983), p. 163–166 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. I. Man’kovskii and E. V. Man’kovskaya, “Application of biooptical relationships for the determination of the characteristics of state of marine media in the optical monitoring of the black-sea waters performed by using transparency meters,” Phys. Oceanography 18 (2), 78–85 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marine Hydrophysical Institute, Russian Academy of SciencesSevastopolRussia

Personalised recommendations