Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 146–152 | Cite as

Variations of Residual CO2 and Pressure in Conifer Woody Roots

  • B. G. AgeevEmail author
  • A. N. Gruzgev
  • Yu. N. Ponomarev
  • V. A. Sapozhnikova
Spectroscopy of Ambient Medium


In continuation of works on the determination of cyclic tree-stem CO2 efflux, vacuum-extracted gas samples of large woody roots of Siberian stone pine and Scots pine are studied. Laser photoacoustic gas analysis was used to obtain chronologies of CO2 and total pressure of gas components in root rings. Spectral and cross-spectral analyses reveal the cyclic character of variations in the chronologies. Such a behavior of the total pressure and CO2 content in large roots can testify to possible cyclic diffusion of CO2 from the roots into soil and then into the atmosphere, which can be considered as a new feature of autotroph respiration. An attempt is made to analyze results of some previous work on a similar subject based on cyclic CO2 efflux from large roots.


CO2 total pressure woody roots cyclicity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Knutti and J. Rogelj, “The legacy of our CO2 emissions: A clash of scientific facts, politics and ethics,” Clim. Chang. 133 (3), 361–373 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. McKinnon, “Climate justice in a carbon budget,” Clim. Chang. 133 (3), 375–384 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3. (last access: 17.07.2017).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. M. Tarko, Can We Decelerate the Global Warming? Russia in the Environment (MNEPU, Moscow, 2008) [ in Russian].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. E. Trumbore, A. Angert, N. Kunert, J. Muhr, and J. Q. Chambers, “What’s the flux? Unraveling how CO2 fluxes from trees reflect underlying physiological processes,” New Phytol. 197 (2), 353–355 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. Kuzyakov, “Sources of CO2 efflux from soil and review of partitioning methods,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 38 (3), 425–448 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    O. V. Trefilova, “Intensity of the heterotrophic respiration in pine forests of middle taiga: Comparative analysis of estimation techniques,” Khvoinye Boreal’noi Zony 24 (4–5), 467–473 (2007).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. Rewald, A. Rechenmacher, and D. L. Godbold, “It’s complicated: Intraroot system variability of respiration and morphological traits in four deciduous tree species,” Plant Phys. 166 (2), 736–745 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. W. Raich and W. H. Schlesinger, “The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate,” Tellus, B 44 (2), 81–99 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Bloemen, M. A. McGuire, D. P. Aubre, R. O. Teskey, K. Steppe, “Transport of root-respired CO2 via the transpiration stream affects aboveground carbon assimilation and CO2 efflux in trees,” New Phytol. 197 (2), 555–565 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Hashimoto, N. Carvalhais, A. Ito, M. Migliavacca, K. Nishina, and M. Reichstein, “Global spatiotemporal distribution of soil respiration modeled using a global database,” Biogeosciences 12, 4121–4132 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. G. Pallardy, Physiology of Woody Plants (Elsevier Academic Press, New York, 2008).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. D. Day, P. E. Wiseman, S. B. Dickinson, and J. R. Harris, “Contemporary concepts of root system architecture of urban trees,” Arboric. Urban For. 36 (4), 149–159 (2010).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. V. Zarubina, V. N. Konovalov, P. A. Feklistov, and D. N. Klevtsov, “Dynamics of root respiration in pine and spruce trees of northern taiga plant communities,” Arctic Environ. Res., No. 2, 52–59 (2014).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. I. Matvienko, M. I. Makarova, and O. V. Menyailo, “Biological sources of soil SO2 under Siberian larch and Scotch pine,” Ekologiya, No. 3, 182–188 (2014).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. S. Pregitzer, “Woody plants, carbon allocation and fine roots,” New Phytol. 158 (3), 419–430 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Bader, E. Hiltbrunner, and C. Korner, “Fine root responses of mature deciduous forest trees to free air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE),” Funct. Ecol. 23 (5), 913–921 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. G. Romanovskii, Yu. A. Gopius, V. V. Mamaev, and R. V. Shchekalev, Autotrophic Respiration of Foreststeppe Oaks (IPP Pravda Severa, Arkhangelsk, 2008) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Y. Hirano, M. Dannoura, K. Aono, T. Igarashi, M. Ishii, K. Yamase, N. Makita, and Y. Kanazawa, “Limiting factors in the detection of tree roots using ground-penetrating radar,” Plant Soil. 319 (1–2), 15–24 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. Bloemen, R. O. Teskey, M. A. McGuire, D. P. Aubrey, and K. Steppe, “Root xylem CO2 flux: An important but unaccounted—for component of root respiration,” Trees. 30 (2), 343–352 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    B. G. Ageev, A. N. Gruzdev, and V. A. Sapozhnikova, “Variations in gas components and total pressure in stem and root disc wood of conifer species,” Atmos. Ocean. Opt. 30 (2), 209–215 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    B. Ageev, Yu. Ponomarev, V. Sapozhnikova, and D. Savchuk, A laser photoacoustic analysis of residual CO2 and H2O in larch stems,” Biosensors. 5 (1), 1–12 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    V. A. Sapozhnikova, A. N. Gruzdev, B. G. Ageev, Yu. N. Ponomarev, and D. A. Savchuk, “Relationship between CO2 and H2O variations in tree rings of siberian stone pine and meteorological parameters,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 450 (2), 652–657 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    V. N. Aref’ev, N. E. Kamenogradskii, F. V. Kashin, and A. V. Shilkin, “Background component of carbon dioxide concentration in the near-surface air,” Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 50 (6), 576–582 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    E. M. Galimov, Nature of Biological Fractioning of Isotopes (Nauka, Moscow, 1986) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. Rubino, D. Etheridge, C. Trudinger, and R. Francey, “A revised 1000 year atmospheric δ13C-CO2 record from Law Dome and South Pole, Antarctica,” J. Geophys. Res. 118 (15), 8482–8499 (2013).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. M. Kay and S. L. Marple, “Spectral analysis—a modern perspective,” Proc. IEEE 69 (11), 1380–1419 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    R. H. Jones, Multivariate Autoregression Estimation Using Residuals (Academic Press, New York, 1978).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    A. N. Gruzdev, H. Schmidt, and G. P. Brasseur, “The effect of the solar rotational irradiance variation on the middle and upper atmosphere calculated by a threedimensional chemistry-climate model,” Atmos. Chem. Phys., No. 9, 595–614 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. N. Gruzdev and V. A. Bezverkhny, “Two regimes of the quasi-biennial oscillation in the equatorial stratospheric wind,” J. Geophys. Res., D 105 (24), 29435–29443 (2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    B. Bond-Lamberty and A. Thomson, “Temperatureassociated increases in the global soil respiration record,” Nature 464 (7288), 579–582 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    B. Bostr-m, D. Comstedt, and A. Ekblad, “Isotope fractionation and 13C enrichment in soil profiles during the decomposition of soil organic matter,” Oecologia 153 (1), P. 89–98 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    L. S. Savel’eva, Wood Root-Grafting (Lesnaya promyshlennost', Moscow, 1969) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    T. Klein, R. T. W. Siegwolf, and C. K-rner, “Belowground carbon trade among tall trees in a temperate forest,” Science 352 (6283), 342–344 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    P. D. Kramer and T. T. Kozlovskii, Wood Physiology (Lesnaya promyshlennost', Moscow, 1983) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    S. Lev-Yadun and D. Sprugel, “Why should trees have natural root grafts?” Tree Physiol. 31 (6), 575–578 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. G. Ageev
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. N. Gruzgev
    • 2
  • Yu. N. Ponomarev
    • 1
  • V. A. Sapozhnikova
    • 1
  1. 1.V.E. Zuev Institute of Atmospheric Optics, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesTomskRussia
  2. 2.Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric PhysicsRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations