Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics

, Volume 30, Issue 5, pp 422–428 | Cite as

Retrieval of crosswind velocity based on the analysis of remote object images: Part 1 — drift of a thin layer of turbulent inhomogeneities

  • V. V. DudorovEmail author
  • A. S. Eremina
Optics of Stochastically-Heterogeneous Media


Numerical simulation is carried out in order to estimate possibilities of crosswind velocity determination along an observation path between a distant object and observer. The estimation is based on the analysis of atmospheric distortions in the object images. The disturbing effect of limited atmospheric regions on the object image and possibilities of the drift velocity retrieval in these regions are analyzed. A new method for filtration of turbulent distortions by their characteristic sizes is suggested with the aim of estimating the wind velocity at different segments of the observation path. It is shown that the technique suggested allows one to determine crosswind velocity with high accuracy when it is applied to a thin layer of atmospheric inhomogeneities.


wind turbulent atmosphere incoherent image 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    V. A. Banakh, D. A. Marakasov, and M. A. Vorontsov, “Cross-wind profiling based on the scattered wave scintillations in a telescope focus,” Appl. Opt. 46 (33), 8104–8117 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. A. Banakh and D. A. Marakasov, “Wind velocity profile reconstruction from intensity fluctuations of a plane wave propagating in a turbulent atmosphere,” Opt. Lett. 32 (15), 2236–2238 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. A. Banakh and D. A. Marakasov, “Wind profiling based on the optical beam intensity statistics in a turbulent atmosphere,” J. Opt. Soc. Am., A 24 (10), 3245–3254 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. A. Marakasov, “Algorithm for reconstruction of wind profile from turbulent intensity fluctuations of a scattered wave in a receiving telescope,” Atmos. Ocean. Opt. 20 (12), 1014–1018 (2007).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. V. Antoshkin, V. V. Lavrinov, L. N. Lavrinova, and V. P. Lukin, “Differential method for wavefront sensor measurements of turbulence parameters and wind velocity,” Atmos. Ocean. Opt. 21 (1), 64–68 (2008).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. A. Marakasov, D. S. Rychkov, and A. V. Falits, “Reconstruction of cross-wind and structure characteristic profiles from turbulent intensity fluctuations of laser beam,” Opt. Atmos. Okeana 22 (1), 82–85 (2009).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. A. Marakasov, “Wind profiling reconstruction from laser beam intensity fluctuations in a receiving telescope,” Opt. Atmos. Okeana 23 (4), 304–307 (2010).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. L. Afanas’ev, V. A. Banakh, and A. P. Rostov, “Estimate of wind velocity in the atmosphere based on an analysis of turbulent distortions of laser beam images registered by video camera,” Atmos. Ocean. Opt. 24 (1), 88–94 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. B. Holmes, US Patent No. 5469250 O05469250 (21 November 1995).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Belenkii, Pat. Appl. No. 2010/0128136 A1, US (May 27, 2010).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. V. Dudorov and A. S. Eremina, “Determination of atmospheric turbulent inhomogeneity wind drift from sequence of incoherent images,” Proc. SPIE 9292, 1–6 (2014).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. S. Eremina and V. V. Dudorov, “A method for turbulent distortions filtering and determining their shift speed from video of optical images in the case of atmospheric inhomogeneities by wind drift,” Izv. vuzov, Fiz. 58 (8/2), 192–194 (2015).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. V. Dudorov and A. S. Eremina, “Filtration of optical image distortions for retrieving the drift velocity of atmospheric turbulence inhomogeneities,” Proc. SPIE 9680, 1–8 (2015).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. L. Afanasiev, V. A. Banakh, and A. P. Rostov, “Estimation of the integral wind velocity and turbulence in the atmosphere from distortions of optical images of naturally illuminated objects,” Atmos. Ocean. Opt. 29 (5), 422–430 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. A. Marakasov, “Estimation of mean wind velocity from correlations of centers of gravity shifings for noncoherent sources in the turbulent atmosphere,” Opt. Atmos. Okeana 29 (4), 294–299 (2016).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. V. Dudorov and A. S. Eremina, “Possibilities of crosswind profiling based on incoherent imaging,” Proc. SPIE 10035, 1–7 (2016).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. A. Vorontsov and V. V. Kolosov, “Target-in-theloop beam control: Basic considerations for analysis and wave-front sensing,” J. Opt. Soc. Am., A 22, 126–141 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. V. Dudorov, M. A. Vorontsov, and V. V. Kolosov, “Speckle field propagation in “frozen” turbulence: Brightness function approach,” J. Opt. Soc. Am., A 23 (8), 1924–1936 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    V. V. Dudorov, V. V. Kolosov, and G. A. Filimonov, “Algorithm for formation of infinite turbulent screens for simulation of long-term laser experiments in the atmosphere,” Izv. Tomsk. Politekhn. Un-ta 309 (8), 85–89 (2006).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    V. V. Dudorov, G. A. Filimonov, and V. V. Kolosov, “Algorithm for formation of an infinite random turbulent screen,” Proc. SPIE 6160, CID:61600R (2005).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. L. Lachinova, M. A. Vorontsov, V. V. Dudorov, V. V. Kolosov, and M. T. Valley, “Anisoplanatic imaging through atmospheric turbulence: Brightness function approach,” Proc. SPIE 6708, 67080E (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    V. V. Dudorov and V. V. Kolosov, “Anisoplanatic turbulence correction in incoherent imaging by using reference sources with different wavelengths,” Atmos. Ocean. Opt. 23 (5), 353–358 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.V.E. Zuev Institute of Atmospheric Optics, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of ScienceTomskRussia

Personalised recommendations