Abstract
Knowledge of measurement errors is one of the most important issues for assessing the quality of experimental data. In this paper, we compared various methods and instruments for measuring the total ozone content (TOC) near St. Petersburg in the period from 2009 to 2015. We considered the TOC datasets of ground-based measurements at Voyeykovo (Dobson spectrophotometer and M-124 ozonometer) and Peterhof (Bruker 125HR spectrometer), as well as OMI and IASI satellite measurements. To assess the errors intrinsic to each of these instruments three ensembles of the TOC measurements were formed containing different numbers of comparisons and based on different selection criteria. At the first stage, we determined the means and standard deviations between the ensembles of the TOC measurements. Then, assuming a horizontally homogeneous and stationary ozone field, the random and systematic errors of individual methods were evaluated. The average random errors of the TOC measurements for all tree ensembles were 2.9 ± 0.5%, 2.8 ± 0.7%, 1.2 ± 0.2%, and 1.4 ± 0.1% for IASI, M-124, OMI, and Bruker 125HR, respectively. The systematic error of the standard Dobson measurements is–1.7% and–2.1% for OMI and IASI, respectively, and amounts to + 0.5% and + 2.1% for M-124 and Bruker 125HR, respectively. The OMI and Bruker 125HR TOC measurement errors are most resistant to atmospheric conditions, whereas errors in IASI and M-124 TOC measurements depend to a large extent on the state of the atmosphere.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Assessment for Decision-Makers: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion. Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, Report N 56 (WMP, Geneva, 2014).
Yu. M. Timofeev, “Satellite methods for the study of gas composition of the atmosphere (Review),” Izv. Akad. Nauk, Fiz. Atmos. Okeana 26 (5), 451–472 (1989).
B. Hassler, I. Petropavlovskikh, J. Staehelin, T. August, P. K. Bhartia, C. Clerbaux, D. Degenstein, M. D. Mazière, B. M. Dinelli, A. Dudhia, G. Dufour, S. M. Frith, L. Froidevaux, S. Godin-Beekmann, J. Granville, N. R. P. Harris, K. Hoppel, D. Hubert, Y. Kasai, M. J. Kurölä, E. Kyrola, J.-C. Lambert, P. F. Levelt, C. T. McElroy, R. D. McPeters, R. Munro, H. Nakajima, A. Parrish, P. Raspollini, E. E. Remsberg, K. H. Rosenlof, A. Rozanov, T. Sano, Y. Sasano, M. Shiotani, H. G. J. Smit, G. Stiller, J. Tamminen, D. W. Tarasick, J. Urban, J. P. Veefkind, C. Vigouroux, T. von Clarmann, C. von Savigny, K. A. Walker, M. Weber, J. Wild, and J. M. Zawodny, “Past changes in the vertical distribution of ozone—Part 1: Measurement techniques, uncertainties and availability,” Atmos. Meas. Tech. 7 (5), 1395–1427 (2014).
D. Balis, M. Kroon, M. E. Koukouli, E. J. Brinksma, G. Labow, J. P. Veefkind, and R. D. McPeters, “Validation of Ozone Monitoring Instrument total ozone column measurements using Brewer and Dobson spectrophotometer ground-based observations,” J. Geophys. Res. D 112 (24), 46 (2007).
Y. Timofeyev, Y. Virolainen, M. Makarova, A. Poberovsky, A. Polyakov, D. Ionov, S. Osipov, and H. Imhasin, “Ground-based spectroscopic measurements of atmospheric gas composition near Saint Petersburg (Russia),” J. Mol. Spectr. 323, 2–14 (2016).
Ya. A. Virolainen, Yu. M. Timofeev, and A. V. Poberovskii, “Intercomparison of satellite and ground-based ozone total column measurements,” Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 49 (9), 993–1001 (2013).
Y. A. Virolainen, Y. M. Timofeyev, A. V. Polyakov, D. V. Ionov, and A. V. Poberovsky, “Intercomparison of satellite and ground-based measurements of ozone, NO2, HF, and HCl near Saint Petersburg, Russia,” Int. J. Remote Sens. 35 (15), 5677–5697 (2014).
R. D. McPeters, M. Kroon, G. Labow, E. J. Brinksma, D. Balis, I. Petropavlovskikh, J. P. Veefkind, P. K. Bhartia, and P. F. Levelt, “Validation of the Aura ozone monitoring instrument total column ozone product,” J. Geophys. Res. D 113 (15), 14 (2008).
I. Ialongo, G. R. Casale, and A. M. Siani, “Comparison of total ozone and erythemal UV data from OMI with ground-based measurements at Rome station,” Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8 (12), 3283–3289 (2008).
J. Wang, G. Elgered, G. Dick, J. Wickert, M. Bradke, M. Sommer, R. Querel, and D. Smale, “The uncertainty of the atmospheric integrated water vapour estimated from GNSS observations,” Atmos. Meas. Tech. 9 (1), 79–92 (2016).
D. V. Ionov, V. V. Kalinnikov, Yu. M. Timofeev, N. A. Zaitsev, Ya. A. Virolainen, V. S. Kostsov, and A. V. Poberovskii, “Comparison of ground-based radiophysical and optical IR techniques for measurements of integral water vapor,” Radiophys. Quantum Electron. (in press).
F. Hase, J. W. Hannigan, M. T. Coffey, A. Goldman, M. Hopfner, N. B. Jones, C. P. Rinsland, and S. W. Wood, “Intercomparison of retrieval codes used for the analysis of high-resolution ground-based FTIR measurements,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 87 (1), 25–52 (2004).
W. D. Komhyr and R. D. Evans, Operations Handbook— Ozone Observations with a Dobson Spectrophotometer. http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/arep/gaw/documents/GAW183-Dobson-WEB.pdf.
A. M. Shalamyanskii, “CIS ozone monitoring network,” Meteorol. Gidrol, No. 9, 100–104 (1993).
P. F. Levelt, Oord G. H. J. Van Den, M. R. Dobber, A. Malkki, H. Visser, J. De Vries, P. Stammes, J. O. V. Lundell, and H. Saari, “The Ozone Monitoring Instrument,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 44, 1093–1101 (2006).
P. K. Bhartia and C. W. Wellemeyer, OMI TOMS‒V8 Total O3 Algorithm, Algorithm Theoretical Baseline Document: OMI Ozone Products. V. 2. ATBD‒OMI‒02, version 2.0, 2002. http://eospso.gsfc.nasa.gov/eos_homepage/for_scientists/atbd/docs/OMI/ATBD- OMI-02.pdf.
C. Clerbaux, A. Boynard, L. Clarisse, M. George, J. Hadji-Lazaro, H. Herbin, D. Hurtmans, M. Pommier, A. Razavi, S. Turquety, C. Wespes, and P.-F. Coheur, “Monitoring of atmospheric composition using the thermal infrared IASI/MetOp sounder,” Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9 (16), 6041–6054 (2009).
G. Dufour, M. Eremenko, A. Griesfeller, B. Barret, E. LeFlochmoen, C. Clerbaux, J. Hadji-Lazaro, P.-F. Coheur, and D. Hurtmans, “Validation of three different scientific ozone products retrieved from IASI spectra using ozonesondes,” Atmos. Meas. Tech. 5 (3), 611–630 (2012).
Ya. A. Virolainen, Yu. M. Timofeev, A. V. Poberovskii, M. Eremenko, and G. Dyufor, “Evaluation of ozone content in different atmospheric layers using groundbased fourier transform spectrometry,” Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 51 (2), 167–176 (2015).
M. Anton, M. Lopez, J. M. Vilaplana, M. Kroon, R. McPeters, and A. Serrano, “Validation of OMITOMS and OMI-DOAS total ozone column using five Brewer spectroradiometers at the Iberian peninsula,” J. Geophys. Res. 114 (D14307) (2009).
C. Viatte, M. Schneider, A. Redondas, F. Hase, M. Eremenko, P. Chelin, J.-M. Flaud, T. Blumenstock, and J. Orphal, “Comparison of ground-based FTIR and Brewer O3 total column with data from two different IASI algorithms and from OMI and GOME-2 satellite instruments,” Atmos. Meas. Tech. 4 (3), 535–546 (2011).
K. Ya. Kondrat’ev and Yu. M. Timofeev, Meteorological Sounding of the Atmosphere from Space (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1978) [in Russian].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © Ya.A. Virolainen, Yu.M. Timofeyev, A.V. Poberovskii, A.V. Polyakov, A.M. Shalamyanskii, 2017, published in Optika Atmosfery i Okeana.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Virolainen, Y.A., Timofeyev, Y.M., Poberovskii, A.V. et al. Empirical assessment of errors in total ozone measurements with different instruments and methods. Atmos Ocean Opt 30, 382–388 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856017040133
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856017040133