Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 118–125 | Cite as

Potential sources of aerosol pollution of the atmosphere near the Nenetsky Nature Reserve

  • A. A. Vinogradova
  • A. O. Veremeichik
Remote Sensing of Atmosphere, Hydrosphere, and Underlying Surface


A new approach to the calculation of the spatial field of potential pollution sources for remote territories has been suggested. It is based on the analysis of long-term data on air mass transport, taken from the NOAA reanalysis data ( Five-day backward air mass trajectories have been calculated for the region of the Nenetsky Nature Reserve (the Pechora River estuary) for each day of January and July over 10 years (2001–2010). These two months have the most contrasting climatic characteristics in a year. The atmospheric concentrations of heavy metals calculated for the Nenetsky Nature Reserve territory show a good agreement with other estimates and experimental data for the nearest sites. The results mapped give visual information on the spatial distribution (for each month) of sites of the maximally possible anthropogenic impact on the atmospheric composition near the Nenetsky Nature Reserve.


Black Carbon Oceanic Optic Aerosol Pollution Potential Pollution Source Anthropogenic Heavy Metal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Persistent Toxic Substances, Food Security and Indigenous Peoples of the Russian North, Final Report (AMAP, Oslo, 2004.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Quinn et al., The Impact of Short-Lived Pollutants on Arctic Climate. AMAP Technical Report No. 1 (2008) (AMAP, Oslo, 2008).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. V. Surkova, I. D. Eremina, and P. A. Mordkovich, “On the Effect of Large-Scale Atmospheric Transport on Chemistry and Amount of Atmospheric Precipitation in the Center of European Russia,” Rus. Meteorol. Hydrol. 35(4), 253–258 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Salvador, B. Artiñano, C. Pio, J. Afonso, M. Legrand, H. Puxbaum, and S. Hammer, “Evaluation of Aerosol Sources at European High Altitude Background Sites with Trajectory Statistical Methods,” Atmos. Environ. 44, 2316–2329 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. A. Vinogradova, L. O. Maksimenkov, and F. A. Pogarskii, “The Influence of Norilsk and Ural Industry on the Environment of Different Siberian Regions,” Atmos. Ocean. Opt. 21(6), 415–420 (2008).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. V. Malyshkin, V. A. Poddubnyi, Yu. I. Markelov, S. A. Beresnev, S. Yu. Gorda, S. M. Sakerin, and A. V. Smirnov, “Middle Ural in the AEROSIBNET System: Preliminary Analysis of the Influence of Regional Sources of Atmospheric Aerosol Pollution,” Atmos. Ocean. Opt. 20(6), 457–460 (2007).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. A. Vinogradova and T. Ya. Ponomareva, “Sources and Sinks of Anthropogenic Microelements in the Arctic Atmosphere: Tendencies in Variations from 1981 to 2005,” Atmos. Ocean. Opt. 20(6), 433–441 (2007).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Annual Report on Emissions of Pollutants in the Atmospheric Air of Russian Cities and Regions in 2007 (St. Petersburg, 2008) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. R. Draxler and G. D. Rolph,
  10. 10.
    F. Ya. Rovinskii, S. A. Gromov, L. V. Burtseva, and S. G. Paramonov, “Heavy Metals: Long-Range Atmospheric Transport and Precipitation,” Meteorol. Gidrol., No. 10, 5–14 (1994).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. L. Byzova, E. K. Garger, and V. N. Ivanov, Experimental Researches of Atmospheric Diffusion and Calculations of Contaminant Scattering (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1991) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Geographic Atlas of an Officer (Izd. Dop. UNIINTEKh, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Gal’perin, M. Sofiev, A. Gusev, and O. Afinogenova, Approaches to Simulation of Transboundary Pollution of European Atmosphere by Heavy Metals (EMEP/MSTs-V, Moscow, 1995) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. D. Kahl, J. M. Harris, G. A. Herbert, and M. P. Olson, “Intercomparison of Three Long-Rangs Trajectory Models Applied to Arctic Haze,” Tellus, B 41(5), 524–536 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. A. Vinogradova and T. Ya. Ponomareva, “Atmospheric Transport of Anthropogenic Impurities to the Russian Arctic (1986–2010),” Atmos. Ocean. Opt. 25(6), 414–422 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. A. Vinogradova, L. O. Maksimenkov, and F. A. Pogarskii, “Industrial Complexes of Polar Regions as Sources of Anthropogenic Heavy Metals in the Environment of Russian Arctic,” in Environmental and Climate Change: Natural and Related Technogenic Catastrophes. Vol. 3. Part 2. Natural Processes in Polar Regions of the Earth, Ed. by V. M. Kotlyakov (IG RAN, IFZ RAN, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. I. Golubeva, L. V. Burtseva, and V. A. Ginzburg, “Heavy Metals in the Atmospheric Precipitation on the Barents Sea Coast,” Rus. Meteorol. Hydrol. 35(5), 333–340 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. P. Shevchenko, A. P. Lisitsyn, A. A. Vinogradova, V. V. Smirnov, and R. Shtain, Arctic Aerosols and Their Environmental Effect, Ed. by K. P. Kutsenogii (Izd-vo SO RAN, Novosibirsk, 2006) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    T. Berg, A.-G. Hjellbrekke, and J. E. Skjelmoen, Heavy Metals and POPs within the ECE Region, EMEP/CCC Report 8/96, O-95038 (NILU, Norway, 1996).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. A. Vinogradova and Yu. A. Ivanova, “Anthropogenic Pollution of Kostomuksha Reserve (Karelia) Environment under Long-Range Atmospheric Transport of Aerosols,” Opt. Atmos. Okeana 24(6), 493–501 (2011).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Vinogradova
    • 1
  • A. O. Veremeichik
    • 2
  1. 1.Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric PhysicsRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations