Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Study of the DNA-Damaging Activity of Epichlorohydrin Using Escherichia coli Biosensors and the Comet Assay Method in Mice

  • GENERAL GENETICS
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comparative study of the genotoxic effects of methylmethanesulfonate (MMS) and epichlorohydrin (ECH) was performed using bacterial E. coli biosensors and the comet assay method in mice. ECH was shown to induce weaker SOS response and expression of the alkA gene in bacterial cells compared to MMS. In vivo experiments on mice using the comet assay method showed DNA-damaging activity of ECH in cells of the liver, kidneys, and lungs after 3 h of exposure, same as of MMS. The levels of DNA damage caused by ECH in these organs after exposure for 3 h were lower than for MMS. The genotoxic effect of ECH after 18 h of exposure was statistically significant only in a dose of 20 mg/kg in kidney cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Lawrence, W.H., Malikj, M., and Autian, J., Toxicity profile of epichlorohydrin, J. Pharm. Sci., 1972, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 1712—1717.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Epichlorohydrin, Lyon, France: IARC, 1999, vol. 71, pp. 603—628.

  3. Passang, T. and Millard, J.T., Epichlorohydrin-induced DNA-protein cross-links in human leukemia cells, FASEB J., 2019, vol. 33, no. 1, suppl., pp. 457—517. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2019.33.1supplement.457.17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kučerová, M., Zhurkov, V.S., Polívková, Z., et al., Mutagenic effect of epichlorohydrin. II. Analysis of chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes of persons occupationally exposed to epichlorohydrin, Mutat. Res., 1977, vol. 48, pp. 355—360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(77)90178-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Šrám, R.J., Zudová, Z., and Kuleshov, N.P., Cytogenetic analysis of peripheral lymphocytes in workers occupationally exposed to epichlorohydrin, Mutat. Res., 1980, vol. 70, pp. 115—120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(80)90064-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Šrám, R.J., Tomatis, L., Clemmesen, J., and Bridges, B.A., An evaluation of the genetic toxicity of epichlorohydrin. A report of an expert group of the International Commission for Protection against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens, Mutat. Res., 1981, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 299—319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kolman, A., Chovanec, M., and Golkar, O.S., Genotoxic effects of ethylene oxide, propylene oxide and epichlorohydrin in humans: update review (1990—2001), Mutat. Res., Rev. Mutat. Res., 2002, vol. 512, pp. 173—194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Giri, A.K., Genetic toxicology of epichlorohydrin: a review, Mutat. Res., 1997, vol. 386, no. 1, pp. 25—38. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1383-5742(96)00042-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rossi, A.M., Migliore, L., Lascialfari, D., et al., Genotoxicity, metabolism and blood kinetics of epichlorohydrin in mice, Mutat. Res., 1983, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 213—226. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1218(83)90144-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Phuong, M. Le, Silvestri, V.L., Redstone, S.C., et al., Cross-linking by epichlorohydrin and diepoxybutane correlates with cytotoxicity and leads to apoptosis in human leukemia (HL-60) cells, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 2018, vol. 352, pp. 19—27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2018.05.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Romano, K.P., Newman, A.G., Zahran, R.W., et al., DNA interstrand cross-linking by epichlorohydrin, Chem. Res. Toxicol., 2007, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 832—838. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx700066h

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hindsø Landin, H., Segerbäck, D., Damberg, C., et al., Adducts with haemoglobin and with DNA in epichlorohydrin-exposed rats, Chem. Biol. Interact., 1999, vol. 117, pp. 49—64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2797(98)00099-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Plna, K., Osterman-Golkar, S., Nogradi, E., et al., 32P-post-labeling of 7-(3-chloro-2-hydroxypropyl)-guanine in white blood cells of workers occupationally exposed to epichlorohydrin, Carcinogenesis, 2000, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 275—280. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/21.2.275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kotova, V.Yu., Manukhov, I.V., and Zavil’gel’skii, G.B., Lux biosensors for detecting SOS response, heat shock and oxidative stress, Biotekhnologiya, 2009, no. 6, pp. 16—25. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683810080089

  15. OECD. Test Guide 489: OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals: In Vivo Mammalian Alkaline Comet Assay, OECD: Paris, 2016.

  16. Tice, R.R., Agurell, E., Anderson, D., et al., Single cell gel/comet assay: guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing, Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 2000, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 206—221. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(2000)35:33.0.CO;2-J

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hartmann, A., Agurell, E., Beevers, C., et al., Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay, Mutagenesis, 2003, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 45—51. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/18.1.45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Igonina, E.V., Marsova, M.V., and Abilev, S.K., Lux-biosensors: screening biologically active compounds for genotoxicity, Ekol. Genet., 2016, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 52—62. https://doi.org/10.17816/ecogen14452-62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zavilgelsky, G.B., Kotova, V.Yu., and Manukhov, I.V., Action of 1,1-dimethylhydrazine on bacterial cells is determined by hydrogen peroxide, Mutat. Res., 2007, vol. 634, pp. 172—176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2007.07.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zavilgelsky, G.B., 60 years of SOS repair, Mol. Biol. (Moscow), 2013, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 605—612. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026893313050221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sedgwick, B., Batesb, P.A., Paik, J., et al., Repair of alkylated DNA: recent advances, DNA Repair, 2007, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 429—442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.10.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mielecki, D. and Grzesiuk, E., Ada response—a strategy for repair of alkylated DNA in bacteria, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 2014, vol. 355, no. 1, pp. 1—11. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6968

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sakumi, K., Igarashi, K., Sekiguchi, M., et al., The Ada protein is a class I transcription factor of Escherichia coli, J. Bacteriol., 1993, vol. 175, pp. 2455—2457. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.175.8.2455-2457.1993

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Landini, P. and Volkert, M.R., Regulatory responses of the adaptive response to alkylation damage: a simple regulon with complex regulatory features, J. Bacteriol., 2000, vol. 182, no. 23, pp. 6543—6549. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.182.23.6543-6549.2000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Mielecki, D., Wrzesiński, M., and Grzesiuk, E., Inducible repair of alkylated DNA in microorganisms, Mutat. Res., 2015, vol. 763, pp. 294—305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2014.12.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Oshida, K., Iwanaga, E., Miyamoto-Kuramitsu, K., et al., An in vivo comet assay of multiple organs (liver, kidney and bone marrow) in mice treated with methyl methanesulfonate and acetaminophen accompanied by hematology and/or blood chemistry, J. Toxicol. Sci., 2008, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 515—524. https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.33.515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tsuda, S., Matsusaka, N., Madarame, H., et al., The alkaline single cell electrophoresis assay with eight mouse organs: results with 22 mono-functional alkylating agents (including 9 dialkyl N-nitrosoamines) and 10 DNA crosslinkers, Mutat. Res., 2000, vol. 467, no. 1, pp. 83—98. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1383-5718(00)00014-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chovanec, M., Näslund, M., Spivak, I., et al., Rejoining of DNA strand breaks induced by propylene oxide and epichlorohydrin in human diploid fibroblasts, Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 1998, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 223—228. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2280(1998)32:3<223::aid-em4>3.0.co;2-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rossi, A.M., Migliore, L., Lascialfari, D., et al., Genotoxicity, metabolism and blood kinetics of epichlorohydrin in mice, Mutat. Res., 1983, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 213—226. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1218(83)90144-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rossi, A.M., Migliore, L., Loprieno, N., et al., Valuation of epichlorohydrin (ECH) genotoxicity: microsomal epoxide hydrolase-dependent deactivation of ECH mutagenicity in Schizosaccharomyces pombe in vitro, Mutat. Res., Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen., 1983, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 41—52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(83)90093-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. K. Abilev.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement on the welfare of animals. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Additional information

Translated by A. Lisenkova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ordzhonikidze, K.G., Igonina, E.V., Zhoshibekova, B.S. et al. Comparative Study of the DNA-Damaging Activity of Epichlorohydrin Using Escherichia coli Biosensors and the Comet Assay Method in Mice. Russ J Genet 57, 1035–1041 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795421090088

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795421090088

Keywords:

Navigation