Genetic diversity of a large number of populations is analyzed using various Y-chromosome markers. Genotyping of a wide range of novel highly informative SNP and YSTR markers shows that most of the Y-chromosome haplogroups can be divided not only into ethnically specific lineages but also into narrower sublineages and clusters of haplotypes. A significant extent of population and interethnic genetic differentiation is revealed. Most ethnic gene pools are characterized by the predominance or even complete dominance of specific SNPs across all major haplogroups, that is highly promising for the application in ethnic identification of biological samples of males.
This is a preview of subscription content,to check access.
Access this article
Karmin, M., Saag, L., Vicente, M., et al., A recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity coincides with a global change in culture, Genome Res., 2015, pp. 459—466. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.186684.114
Ilumäe, A.-M., Reidla, M., Chukhryaeva, M., et al., Human Y-chromosome haplogroup N: a non-trivial time-resolved phylogeography that cuts across language families, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 2016, vol. 99, pp. 163—173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.05.025
Hallast, P., Batini, C., Zadik, D., et al., The Y-chromosome tree bursts into leaf: 13 000 high-confidence SNPs covering the majority of known clades, Mol. Biol. Evol., 2015, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 661—673. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu327
Jobling, M.A. and Tyler-Smith, C., The human Y‑chromosome: an evolutionary marker comes of age, Nat. Rev. Genet., 2003, vol. 4, pp. 598—612. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1124
Jobling, M.A. and Gill, P., Encoded evidence: DNA in forensic analysis, Nat. Rev., 2004, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 739—751. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1455
Kayser, M., Kittler, R., Erler, A., et al., A comprehensive survey of human Y-chromosomal microsatellites, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 2004, vol. 74, pp. 1183—1197. https://doi.org/10.1086/421531
Zhivotovsky, L.A., Underhill, P.A., Cinnioglu, C., et al., On the effective mutation rate at Y-chromosome STRs with application to human population divergence time, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 2004, vol. 74, pp. 50—61. https://doi.org/10.1086/380911
Dupanloup, I., Pereira, L., Bertorelle, G., et al., A recent shift from polygeny to monogamy in humans is suggested by the analysis of worldwide Y-chromosome diversity, Mol. Evol., 2003, vol. 57, pp. 85—97.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-003-2458-x
Rizzo, J.M. and Buck, M.J., Key principles and clinical applications of “next-generation” DNA sequencing, Cancer Prev. Res., 2012, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 887—900. https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0432
Grandell, I., Samara, R., and Tillmar, A.O., A SNP panel for identity and kinship testing using massive parallel sequencing, Int. J. Legal Med., 2016, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 905—914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1341-4
Amorim, A. and Pinto, N., Big data in forensic genetics, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 2018, no. 37, pp. 102—105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.08.001
Kivisild, T., The study of human Y chromosome variation through ancient DNA, Hum. Genet., 2017, vol. 136, pp. 529—546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-017-1773-z
Khar’kov, V.N. and Stepanov, V.A., Y chromosome markers in the DNA identification: achievements, problems and prospects, Molekulyarnaya diagnostika2017 (Molecular Diagnostics 2017) (Proc. IXth All-Russ. Theor. Pract. Conf. Int. Participation), 2017, vol. 1, pp. 423—424.
Boonyarit, H., Mahasirimongkol, S., Chavalvechakul, N., et al., Development of a SNP set for human identification: a set with high powers of discrimination which yields high genetic information from naturally degraded DNA samples in the Thai population, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 2014, vol. 11, pp. 166—173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.03.010
Ge, J., Budowle, B., Planz, J.V., et al., Haplotype block: a new type of forensic DNA markers, Int. J. Legal Med., 2010, vol. 124, no. 5, pp. 353—361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-009-0400-5
Da Costa Francez, PA., Rodrigues, E.M., Velasco, A.M., et al., Insertion—deletion polymorphisms-utilization on forensic analysis, Int. J. Legal Med., 2012, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 491—496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-011-0588-z
Dib, C., Faure, S., Fizames, C., et al., A comprehensive genetic map of the human genome based on 5264 microsatellites, Nature, 1996, vol. 380, pp. 152—154. https://doi.org/10.1038/380152a0
Edwards, A., Civitello, A., Hammond, H.A., et al., DNA typing and genetic mapping with trimeric and tetrameric tandem repeats, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 1991, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 746—756.
Roewer, L. and Epplen, J.T., Rapid and sensitive typing of forensic stains by PCR amplification of polymorphic simple repeat sequences in case work, Forensic Sci. Int., 1992, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 163—171. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(92)90193-z
Stepanov, V.A., Balanovskii, O.P., Mel’nikov, A.V., et al., Characteristics of populations of the Russian Federation over the panel of fifteen loci used for DNA identification and in forensic medical examination, Acta Nat., 2011, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 56—67. https://doi.org/10.32607/20758251-2011-3-2-56-67
Ballantyne, K.N., Keerl, V., Wollstein, A., et al., A new future of forensic Y-chromosome analysis: rapidly mutating Y-STRs for differentiating male relatives and paternal lineages, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 2012, vol. 6, pp. 208—218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.04.017
Butler, J.M., Coble, M.D., and Vallone, P.M., STRs vs SNP: thoughts on the future of forensic DNA testing, Forensic. Sci. Med. Pathol., 2007, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 200—205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-007-0018-1
Chakraborty, R., Stivers, D.N., Su, B., et al., The utility of short tandem repeat loci beyond human identification: implications for development of new DNA typing systems, Electrophoresis, 1999, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 682—1696. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19990101)20:8<1682::AID-ELPS1682>3.0.CO;2-Z
Gill, P., An assessment of the utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for forensic purposes, Int. J. Legal Med., vol. 114, nos. 4—5, pp. 204—210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004149900117
Gill, P., Werrett, D.J., Budowle, B., et al., An assessment of whether SNPs will replace STRs in national DNA databases-joint considerations of the DNA working group of the European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (ENFSI) and the Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (SWGDAM), Sci. Justice, 2004, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 51—53.
Budowle, B., SNP typing strategies, Forensic Sci. Int., 2004, vol. 146, suppl., pp. S139—S142.
Amorim, A. and Pereira, L., Pros and cons in the use of SNPs in forensic kinship investigation: a comparative analysis with STRs, Forensic Sci. Int., 2005, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 17—21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.06.018
Sobrino, B., Bri, M., and Carracedo, A., SNPs in forensic genetics: a review on SNP typing methodologies, Forensic Sci. Int., 2005, vol. 154, pp. 181—194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.10.020
Petkovski, E., Keyser-Tracqui, C., Hienne, R., et al., SNPs and MALDI-TOF MS: tools for DNA typing in forensic paternity testing and anthropology, J. Forensic Sci., 2005, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 535—541.
Johansen, P., Andersen, J.D., and Morling, C., Evaluation of the iPLEX® Sample ID Plus Panel designed for the Sequenom Mass ARRAY® system, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 2013, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 482—487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.04.009
Dixon, L., Dobbins, A.E., Pulker, H.K., et al., Analysis of artificially degraded DNA using STRs and SNPs-results of a collaborative European (EDNAP) exercise, Forensic Sci. Int., 2006, vol. 164, no. 1, pp. 33—44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.11.011
Sanchez, J.J., Phillips, C., Balogh, C., et al., A multiplex assay with 52 single nucleotide polymorphisms for human identification, Electrophoresis, 2006, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1713—1724. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200500671
Pakstis, A.J., Speed, W.C., Fang, R., et al., SNPs for a universal individual identification panel, Hum. Genet., 2010, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 315—324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-009-0771-1
Mizuno, N.A., Kitayama, T., Fujii, K., et al., Forensic method for the simultaneous analysis of biallelic markers identifying Y chromosome haplogroups inferred as having originated in Asia and the Japanese archipelago, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 2010, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 73—79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2009.12.004
This work was carried out as part of the Union State Scientific and Technical Program “Development of Innovative Genogeographic and Genomic Technologies for Personal Identification and Identification of Individual Characteristics Based on the Study of Gene Pools of the Union State Regions” (“DNA Identification”), state contract no. 011-17 of September 26, 2017, and also supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant no. 18-29-13045) “Human Population Genomics and Transcriptomics: Search for the Signals of Non-Neutral Evolution.”
Conflict of interest. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Statement of compliance with standards of research involving humans as subjects. All procedures performed in this study involving people comply with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national committee for research ethics and the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its subsequent changes or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from each of the participants in the study.
Translated by K. Lazarev
About this article
Cite this article
Kharkov, V.N., Zarubin, A.A., Vagaitseva, K.V. et al. Y Chromosome as a Tool for DNA Identification and Determination of Ethnoterritorial Origin. Russ J Genet 56, 1109–1117 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795420090112