Abstract
The study is focused on the analysis of the mechanisms underlying the formation and distribution of repeat clusters in mammalian chromosomes, as exemplified by a group of closely related species of voles of the subgenus Microtus (Microtus, Arvicolini). The distribution of repetitive sequences that are the parts of de novo formed heterochromatic regions of Microtus arvalis in two chromosomal forms of this species and three closely related species, M. rossiaemeridionalis, M. kirgisorum, and M. transcaspicus, was analyzed in detail. Possible relationships between the introduction of repetitive sequences, their transpositions, amplification, and the formation of reproductive isolation, which can lead to speciation, are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Rubtsov, N.B., Karamysheva, T.V., Bogdanov, A.S., et al., Comparative FISH analysis of C-positive regions of chromosomes of wood mice (Rodentia, Muridae, Sylvaemus), Russ. J. Genet., 2011, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1096—1110.
Rubtsov, N.B., Karamysheva, T.V., Bogdanov, A.S., et al., Comparative analysis of DNA homology in pericentric regions of chromosomes of wood mice from genera Apodemus and Sylvaemus, Russ. J. Genet., 2015, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 1233—1242. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795415120091
Graphodatsky, A.S., Conserved and variable elements of mammalian chromosomes, Cytogenetics of Animals, Halnar, C.R.E., Ed., CAB International Press, 1989, pp. 95—123.
Rubtsov, N.B., Rubtsova, N.V., Anopriyenko, O.V., et al., Reorganization of the X chromosome in voles of the genus Microtus, Cytogenet. Genome Res., 2002, vol. 99, nos. 1—4, pp. 323—329. https://doi.org/10.1159/000071611
Larkin, D.M., Pape, G., Donthu, R., et al., Breakpoint regions and homologous synteny blocks in chromosomes have different evolutionary histories, Genome Res., 2009, vol. 19, pp. 770—777. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.086546.108
Murphy, W.J., Larkin, D.M., Everts-van der Wind, A., et al., Evolution: dynamics of mammalian chromosome evolution inferred from multispecies comparative maps, Science, 2005, vol. 309, pp. 613—617. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111387
Karamysheva, T.V., Bogdanov, A.S., Kartavtseva, I.V., et al., Comparative FISH analysis of C-positive blocks of centromeric chromosomal regions of pygmy wood mice Sylvaemus uralensis (Rodentia, Muridae), Russ. J. Genet., 2010, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 712—724.
Akhverdian, M.R., Liapunova, E.A., Vorontsov, N.N., and Teslenko, S.V., Intrapopulation autosomal polymorphism in the common vole Microtus arvalis of the Transcaucasian region, Russ. J. Genet., 1999, vol. 35, pp. 1687—1698.
Mazurok, N.A., Rubtsova, N.V., Isaenko, A.A., et al., Comparative chromosome and mitochondrial DNA analyses and phylogenetic relationships within common voles (Microtus, Arvicolidae), Chromosome Res., 2001, vol. 9, pp. 107—120.
Meier, M.N., Golenishchev, F.N., Radzhabli, S.I., and Sablina, O.V., Common voles (subgenus Microtus) of the fauna of Russia and adjacent territories, Tr. Zool. Inst., 1996, vol. 232, pp. 90—112.
Nesterova, T.B., Mazurok, N.A., Matveeva, N.M., et al., Demonstration of the X-linkage and order of the genes GLA, G6PD, HPRT, and PGK in two vole species of the genus Microtus, Cytogenet. Genome Res., 1994, vol. 65, pp. 250—255.
Rubtsov, N.B., Karamisheva, T.V., Astakhova, N.M., et al., Zoo-FISH with region-specific paints for mink chromosome 5q: delineation of inter- and intrachromosomal rearrangements in human, pig, and fox, Cytogenet. Genome Res., 2000, vol. 90, pp. 268—270.
Lichter, P., Cremer, T., Tang, C.J., et al., Rapid detection of human chromosome 21 aberrations by in situ hybridization, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1988, vol. 85, pp. 9664—9668.
Chudoba, I., Plesch, A., Loerch, T., et al., High resolution multicolor-banding: a new technique for refined FISH analysis of human chromosomes, Cytogenet. Genome Res., 1999, vol. 84, pp. 156—160.
Karamysheva, T.V., Torgasheva, A.A., Yefremov, Y.R., et al., Spatial organization of fibroblast and spermatocyte nuclei with different B-chromosome content in Korean field mouse, Apodemus peninsulae (Rodentia, Muridae), Genome, 2017, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 815—824. https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2017-0029
Cremer, T. and Cremer, M., Chromosome territories, Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol., 2010, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1—22. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a003889
Cremer, T. and Cremer, C., Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells, Nat. Rev. Genet., 2001, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 292. https://doi.org/10.1038/35066075
Kleckner, N., Questions and assays, Genetics, 2016, vol. 204, pp. 1343—1349. https://doi.org/10.1534/Genetics.116.197608
Zickler, D. and Kleckner, N., A few of our favorite things: pairing, the bouquet, crossover interference and evolution of meiosis, Semin. Cell Dev. Biol., 2016, vol. 54, pp. 135—148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.02.024
Funding
This study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant no. 19-015-00084a) and budget financing for the state contract (0324-2019-0042, state registration no. AAAA-А17-117071240065-4).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Statement on the welfare of animals. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Conflicts of interest. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated by N. Maleeva
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rubtsova, N.V., Karamysheva, T.V. & Rubtsov, N.B. Clusters of Repetitive DNA Sequences in Chromosomes of Voles of the Subgenus Microtus (Microtus, Arvicolidae). Russ J Genet 55, 1093–1102 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795419090126
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795419090126