Skip to main content
Log in

Transformation of Baikal sponges (family Lubomirskiidae) after penetration into the Angara River

  • Animal Genetics
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic and morphological analysis of endemic sponges of the Lubomirskiidae family from Lake Baikal and the upper reaches of the Angara River was performed. Various sponge species acquired a number of similar morphological traits after the transition from the lake into the river. These traits enabled an increase of sponge skeleton strength under the conditions of elevated hydrodynamic activity. The changes significantly impeded morphology-based species identification of Angara sponges. Phylogenetic analysis of ITS regions and noncoding mitochondrial DNA fragments confirmed that the Angara sponges belonged to the Baikalian Lubomirskiidae family and demonstrated the polyphyletic origin of the sponges. The use of combined molecular and morphological data allowed for the clustering of some sponge samples into groups that corresponded to individual species. The absence of genetic isolation between the Baikalospongia intermedia and Lubomirskia baicalensis species was demonstrated, whereas the B. intermedia profundalis subspecies was well separated from B. intermedia. This finding pointed to the necessity of further studies for the clarification of the taxonomic status of this subspecies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kozhov, M.M., Biologiya ozera Baikal (Biology of Lake Baikal), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kozhov, M.M., About the benthos of Southern Baikal, Bentos i plankton Yuzhnogo Baikala (Benthos and Plankton of Southern Baikal), Izv. Irkutsk. Gos. Univ., Ser. Biol. Ecol., 1970, vol. 23, issue 1, pp. 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Efremova, S.M., Sponges, in Annotirovannyi spisok fauny ozera Baikal i ego vodosbornogo basseina (An Annotated List of the Fauna of Lake Baikal and Its Catchment Area), Timoshkin, O.A., Ed., Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2001, vol. 1, pp. 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Efremova, S.M., New genus and new species of sponges from the family Lubomirskiidae Rezvoj, 1936, in Annotirovannyi spisok fauny ozera Baikal i ego vodosbornogo basseina (An Annotated List of the Fauna of Lake Baikal and Its Catchment Area), Timoshkin, O.A., Ed., Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2004, vol. 1, book 2, pp. 1261–1278.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Manconi, R. and Pronzato, R., Global diversity of sponges (Porifera: Spongillina) in freshwater, Hydrobiologia, 2008, vol. 595, no. 1, pp. 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Harcet, M., Bilandzija, H., Bruvo-Madaric, B., and Cetkovic, H., Taxonomic position of Eunapius subterraneus (Porifera, Spongillidae) inferred from molecular data—a revised classification needed?, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2010, vol. 54, pp. 1021–1027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schronberg, C.H.L. and Barthel, D., Unreliability of demosponge skeletal characters: the example of Halichondria panacea, in Sponge Sciences, Watanabe, Y. and Fusetani, N., Eds., Tokyo: Springer-Verlag, 1998, pp. 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maldonado, M., Carmona, M.C., Uriz, M.J., and Cruzado, A., Decline in Mesozoic reef-building sponges explained by silicon limitation, Nature, 1999, vol. 401, pp. 785–788. doi 10.1038/44560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bell, J., Barnes, D., and Turner, J., The importance of micro and macro morphological variation in the adaptation of a sublittoral demosponge to current extremes, Mar. Biol., 2002, vol. 140, pp. 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Soest, R., Boury-Esnault, N., Vacelet, J., et al., Global diversity of sponges (Porifera), PLoS One, 2012, vol. 7: e35105. doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0035105

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Manconi, R. and Pronzato, R. Suborder Spongillina subord. nov.: freshwater sponges, in Systema Porifera: A Guide to the Classification of Sponges, vol. 1, Hooper, J.N.A. and Van Soest, R.W.M., Eds., Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002, pp. 921–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Castellani, C., Maas, A., Haug, C., et al., Isolated sponges spicules from the late Cambrian Alum Shale Formation (‘Orsten’ nodules) of Sweden, Bull. Geosci., 2012, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 443–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Veinberg, E.V., Spongiofauna of the Pliocene—Quaternary deposits of Lake Baikal, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. Dissertation, St. Petersburg, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maikova, O., Khanaev, I., Belikov, S., and Sherbakov, D., Two hypotheses of the evolution of endemic sponges in Lake Baikal (Lubomirskiidae), J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res., 2015, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 175–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schroder, H.C., Efremova, S.M., Itskovich, V.B., et al., Molecular phylogeny of the freshwater sponges in Lake Baikal, J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res., 2002, vol. 40, pp. 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Itskovich, V., Belikov, S., Efremova, S., et al., Phylogenetic relationships between freshwater and marine Haplosclerida (Porifera, Demospongiae) based on the full length 18S rRNA and partial COXI gene sequences, in Porifera Research—Biodiversity, Innovation and Sustainability, 2007, pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Boury-Esnault, N., Lavrov, D.V., Ruiz, C.A., and Perez, T., The integrative taxonomic approach applied to Porifera: a case study of the Homoscleromorpha, Integr. Comp. Biol., 2013, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 416–427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rezvoi, P.D., Freshwater sponges (families Spongillidae and Lubomirskiidae), in Fauna SSSR (Fauna of the Soviet Union), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1936, vol. 2, pp. 90–101.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bazikalova, A., About amphipoda of Angara River, Proc. Baikal Limnol. Stat., 1957, vol. 15, pp. 377–387.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Golyshkina, R., Benthos of Irkutsk Reservoir in first years of its existence (1957–1961), Proc. IBIW AN SSSR, 1963, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Masuda, Y., Studies on the taxonomy and distribution of freshwater sponges in Lake Baikal, Prog. Mol. Subcell. Biol., 2009, vol. 47, pp. 81–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wetzel, R.G. and Likens, G.E., Limnological Analyses, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Baram, G.I., Vereshchagin, A.L., and Golobokova, L.P., Application of microcolumn HPLC with UV detection to analysis of anions in environmental objects, Zh. Anal. Khim., 1999, p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Boeva, L., Rukovodstvo dlya khimicheskogo analiza poverkhnostnykh vod (Guidelines for the Chemical Analysis of Surface Waters), Rostov-on-Don: RosGidromet, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E.F., and Sambrook, J., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Lab., 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Maikova, O.O., Stepnova, G.N., and Belikov, S.I., Variations in noncoding sequences of the mitochondrial DNA in sponges from family Lubomirskiidae, Dokl. Biol. Sci., 2012, vol. 442, nos. 1–6, pp. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Itskovich, V., Gontcharov, A., Masuda, Y., et al., Ribosomal its sequences allow resolution of freshwater sponge phylogeny with alignments guided by secondary structure prediction, J. Mol. Evol., 2008, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 608–620.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Katoh, K. and Toh, H., Recent developments in the mafft multiple sequence alignment program, Briefings Bioinf., 2008, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 286–298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ronquist, F. and Huelsenbeck, J.P., MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models, Bioinformatics, 2003, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1572–1574.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Newton, M. and Raftery, A., Approximate Bayesian inference with the weighted likelihood bootstrap (with discussion), J. R. Stat. Soc., Ser. B, 1994, vol. 56, p. 348.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Suchard, M., Weiss, R., and Sinsheimer, J., Bayesian selection of continuous-time Markov chain evolutionary models, Mol. Biol. Evol., 2001, vol. 18, pp. 1001–1013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Timoshkin, O.A., Samsonov, D.P., and Yamamuro, M., Rapid ecological change in the coastal zone of Lake Baikal (East Siberia): is the site of the world’s greatest freshwater biodiversity in danger?, J. Great Lakes Res., 2016, vol. 42, pp. 487–497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lavrov, D., Rapid proliferation of repetitive palindromic elements in mtDNA of the endemic Baikalian sponge Lubomirskia baicalensis, Mol. Biol Evol., 2010, vol. 27, pp. 757–760.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Itskovich, V.B., Kalyuzhnaya, O.V., and Belikov, S.I., Investigation of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA polymorphism in closely related species of endemic Baikal sponges, Russ. J. Genet., 2013, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 966–974.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bukshuk, N.A. and Timoshkin, O.A., Morphology and vertical distribution of Baikalospongia intermedia (Spongia: Lubomirskiidae) in the deep-water zone of Lake Baikal, Izv. Irkutsk Gos. Univ., Ser. Biol. Ekol., 2013, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 128–131.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Maikova, O.O., Itskovich, V.B., Semiturkina, N.A., et al., Phylogenetic position of sponges from Chagatai and Tore-Khol lakes, Russ. J. Genet., 2010, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 1670–1677.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Itskovich, V., Kaluzhnaya, O., Ostrovsky, I., and McCormack, G., The number of endemic species of freshwater sponges (Malawispongiidae; Spongillina; Porifera) from Lake Kinneret is overestimated, J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res., 2013, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 252–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kelly-Borges, M. and Pomponi, S., Phylogeny and classification of lithistid sponges (Porifera, Demospongiae): a preliminary assessment using ribosomal DNA sequence comparisons, Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotech., 1994, vol. 3, pp. 87–103.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Borchiellini, C., Manuel, M., Alivon, E., et al., Sponge paraphyly and the origin of Metazoa, J. Evol. Biol., 2001, vol. 14, pp. 171–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Erpenbeck, D. and Worheide, G., On the molecular phylogeny of sponges (Porifera), Linnaeus Tercentenary: Progress in Invertebrate Taxonomy, Zhang, Z.-Q. and Shear, W.A., Eds., Zootaxa, 2007, vol. 1668, pp. 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Vargas, S., Schuster, A., Sacher, K., et al., Barcoding sponges: an overview based on comprehensive sampling, PLoS One, 2012, vol. 7, no. 7: e39345. doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0039345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Lavrov, D.V., Maikova, O.O., Pett, W., and Belikov, S.I., Small inverted repeats drive mitochondrial genome evolution in Lake Baikal sponges, Gene, 2012, vol. 505, pp. 91–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. O. Maikova.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © O.O. Maikova, N.A. Bukshuk, V.B. Itskovich, I.V. Khanaev, I.A. Nebesnykh, N.A. Onishchuk, D.Yu. Sherbakov, 2017, published in Genetika, 2017, Vol. 53, No. 12, pp. 1419–1426.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maikova, O.O., Bukshuk, N.A., Itskovich, V.B. et al. Transformation of Baikal sponges (family Lubomirskiidae) after penetration into the Angara River. Russ J Genet 53, 1343–1349 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795417120092

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795417120092

Keywords

Navigation