Skip to main content
Log in

Nucleolar organizing regions (NORs) of common vole chromosomes as nuclear markers of genome differentiation in data from a hybrid zone of two karyoforms, arvalis and obscurus

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contrasting chromosome location of nucleolar organizing regions (NORs), a poorly studied differentiating feature of two karyoforms of the 46-chromosome common voles, arvalis and obscurus, is demonstrated in the heterozygous karyotype of a natural hybrid from the arvalis/obscurus contact zone in European Russia. It was deduced from the karyotype analysis that the obscurus form was parental in this case and the arvalis form was defined as maternal via the markers of the mitochondrial genome. The similarities in the levels of chromosome polytypy and the lineage differentiation of the arvalis/obscurus and obscurus mitochondrial genomes according to the new and earlier published data is noticeable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Baker, R.J. and Bradley, R.D., Speciation in mammals and the genetic species concept, J. Mammal., 2006, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 643–662. doi 10.1644/06-MAMMF- 038R2.1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Vavilov, N.I., The Linnean species as a system, in Izbrannye proizvedeniya v dvukh tomakh (Selected Writings in Two Volumes), Leningrad: Nauka, 1967, vol. 1, pp. 62–87.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zima, J., Comparative cytogenetics of Palaearctic mammals, Folia Zool., 1993, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lavrenchenko, L.A. and Bulatova, N.Sh., The role of hybrid zones in speciation: a case study on chromosome races of the house mouse Mus domesticus and common shrew Sorex araneus, Biol. Bull. Rev., 2016, vol. 6, no 3, pp. 232–244. doi 10.1134/S2079086416030051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bulatova, N.Sh., Potapov, S.G., and Lavrenchenko, L.A., Genomic versus chromosomal polytypy in studies of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA markers in the Microtus arvalis group, Russ. J. Genet., 2010, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 668–676. doi 10.1134/S1022795410050121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tougard, C., Montuire, S., Volobouev, V., et al., Exploring phylogeography and species limits in the Altai vole (Rodentia: Cricetidae), Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 2013, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 434–452. doi 10.1111/j.1095- 8312.2012.02034.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Obyknovennaya polevka: vidy-dvoiniki Microtus arvalis Pallas, 1779, M. rossiaemeridionalis Ognev 1924 (Common Vole: Sibling Species Microtus arvalis Pallas, 1779, M. rossiaemeridionalis Ognev, 1924), Moscow: Nauka, 1994.

  8. Bulatova, N.Sh., Golenishchev, F.N., Koval’skaya, Yu.M., et al., Cytogenetic study of the parapatric contact zone between two 46-chromosomal forms of the common vole in European Russia, Russ. J. Genet., 2010, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 443–448. doi 10.1134/S1022795410040095

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mazurok, N.A., Rubtsova, N.V., Isaenko, A.A., et al., Comparative chromosome and mitochondrial DNA analyses and phylogenetic relationships within common voles (Microtus, Arvicolidae), Chromosome Res., 2001, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 107–120. doi 10.1023/A:1009226918924

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bulatova, N. and Pavlova, S., A possible cytogenetic analogy to genomic “speciation islands” as revealed by chromosome study of a natural hybrid vole, Tsitologia, 2016, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 412–415.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bulatova, N.Sh., Pavlova, S.V., Romanenko, S.A., et al., Molecular cytogenetic markers of cryptic species and hybrids of the common vole superspecies complex Microtus arvalis s. l., Tsitologia, 2013, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 268–270.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kozlovskii, A.I., Bulatova, N.Sh., and Novikov, A.D., Double inversion effect in the karyotype of a common vole, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1988, vol. 298, no. 4, pp. 994–997.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yorulmaz, T., Zima, J., Arslan, A., and Kankiliç, T., Variations in C-heterochromatin and AgNOR distribution in the common vole (Microtus arvalis sensu lato) (Mammalia: Rodentia), Arch. Biol. Sci. (Belgrade), 2013, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 989–995. doi 10.2298/ABS1303989Y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuliev, G.N., An attempt to hybridize three species of forest mice (Sylvaemus uralensis, S. fulvipectus, S. ponticus) and different geographic populations of the common vole (Microtus arvalis) from Azerbaijan, J. Kharkiv Nat. Univ., Ser. Biol., 2012, vol. 15, no. 1008, pp. 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Sh. Bulatova.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © N.Sh. Bulatova, S.V. Pavlova, S.G. Potapov, A.R. Gromov, 2017, published in Genetika, 2017, Vol. 53, No. 6, pp. 761–764.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bulatova, N.S., Pavlova, S.V., Potapov, S.G. et al. Nucleolar organizing regions (NORs) of common vole chromosomes as nuclear markers of genome differentiation in data from a hybrid zone of two karyoforms, arvalis and obscurus . Russ J Genet 53, 736–739 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795417060035

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795417060035

Keywords

Navigation