Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A detection of allelic variants at microsatellite markers by using capillary and traditional electrophoresis

  • Methods
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microsatellite alleles are detected by PCR (polymerase chain reaction) that provides a manifold increase in the number of copies (amplification) of a given DNA fragment. The fragment visualization can be reached by two different methods. These are fragment analysis by capillary electrophoresis in denaturing gel and fragment separation in non-denaturing gel with subsequent gel staining. The first method is more accurate and automated, but expensive. The second method is much cheaper but less convenient. It requires manual processing and is presumably less accurate. In this study, we present the results of comparison of the allele typing at nine microsatellite loci using these two methods for one of the species of Pacific salmon, sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka Walbaum. In most cases, both methods give identical fragment sizes or with a constant difference if the alleles are relatively small (not larger than 200–220 bp).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Weber, J.L. and Broman, K.W., Genotyping for human whole-genome scans: past, present, and future, Adv. Genet., 2001, vol. 42, pp. 77–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dib, C., Faure, S., Fizames, C., et al., A comprehensive genetic map of the human genome based on 5264 microsatellites, Nature, 1996, vol. 380, pp. 152–154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhivotovsky, L.A., Microsatellite variation in human populations and the methods of their analysis, Inf. Vestn. Vses. O-va Genet. Sel., 2006, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 74–96.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Butler, J.M., Advansed Topics in Forensic DNA Typing: Methodology, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Afanasiev, K.I., Rubtsova, G.A., Malinina, T.V., et al., Microsatellite variability and differentiation of hatchery stocks of chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta Walbaum in Sakhalin, Russ. J. Genet., 2006, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 1431–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ellis, J.S., Gilbey, J., Armstrong, A., et al., Microsatellite standardization and evaluation of genotyping error in a large multi-partner research programme for conservation of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.), Genetics, 2011, vol. 139, no. 3, pp. 353–367.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Afanasiev, K.I., Rubtsova, G.A., Shitova, M.V., et al., Interregional differentiation of chum salmon from Sakhalin and South Kurils inferred from microsatellite markers, Russ. J. Genet., 2008, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 833–840.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rubtsova, G.I., Afanasiev, K.I., Malinina, T.V., et al., Differentiation of chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta Wallbaum populations as revealed with microsatellite and allozyme markers: a comparative study, Russ. J. Genet., 2008, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 841–848.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shitova, M.V., Afanasiev, K.I., Rubtsova, G.A., et al., Microsatellite variability of factory-produced chum salmon populations (Oncorhynchus keta Walbaum) in Sakhalin Island, Vopr. Rybolov., 2009, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 102–115.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhivotovsky, L.A., Rubtsova, G.I., Shitova, M.V., et al., Data base of microsatellite DNA for chum salmon in the Russian Far East, in Realizatsiya “Kontseptsii dal’nevostochnoi basseinovoi programmy izucheniya tikhookeanskikh lososei,” (Implementation of the “Concept of the Far Eastern Basin Study Program of Pacific Salmon”), Shuntov, V.P., Ed., Vladivostok: Tikhookean. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanogr. Tsentr, (Byull., no. 5) pp. 53–63.

  11. Olsen, J.B., Wilson, S.L., and Kretschmer, E.J., et al., Characterization of 14 tetranucleotide microsatellite loci derived from sockeye salmon, Mol. Ecol., 2000, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 2185–2187.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rexroad, C.E, Coleman, R.L., Martin, A.M., et al., Thirty five polymorphic microsatellite markers for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), Anim. Genet., 2001, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 317–319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nelson, R.J. and Beachem, T.D., Isolation and cross species amplification of microsatellite loci useful for study of Pacific salmon, Anim. Genet., 1999, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 228–229.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Khrustaleva, A.M., Kompleksnyi metod differentsiatsii nerki (Oncorhynchus nerka) (Complex Method for Differentiation of Sockeye Salmon), Moscow: Vsross. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanogr., 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smith, C.T., Koop, B.F., and Nelson, R.J., Isolation and characterization of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) microsatellites and their use in other salmonids, Mol. Ecol., 1998, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1614–1616.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. A. Zhivotovsky.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © G.A. Rubtsova, E.V. Ponomareva, K.I. Afanasiev, E.G. Shaikhaev, M.V. Kholodova, S.D. Pavlov, L.A. Zhivotovsky, 2016, published in Genetika, 2016, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 482–487.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rubtsova, G.A., Ponomareva, E.V., Afanasiev, K.I. et al. A detection of allelic variants at microsatellite markers by using capillary and traditional electrophoresis. Russ J Genet 52, 423–427 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795416040086

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795416040086

Keywords