Skip to main content
Log in

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis by blastocentesis: Problems and perspectives

  • Reviews and Theoretical Articles
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The discovery of cell-free DNA in blastocoele fluid opens new perspectives for the development of preimplantation genetic diagnosis of human chromosomal and genetic diseases. In this review we analyzed the results of the first studies, which made it possible to evaluate the effectiveness of the application of a new source of biological material and showed a high degree of agreement between the results of molecular karyotyping with cell-free DNA and blastocyst cells. The results suggest the possibility of developing a noninvasive method of preimplantation genetic diagnosis, which may open a new round of progress in the field of assisted reproductive technologies and the genetics of early stages of human ontogenesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Palini, S., Galluzzi, L., De Stefani, S., et al., Genomic DNA in human blastocoele fluid, Reprod. Biomed. Online, 2013, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 603–610.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson, D.S., Cinnioglu, C., Ross, R., et al., Comprehensive analysis of karyotypic mosaicism between trophectoderm and inner cell mass, Mol. Hum. Reprod., 2010, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 944–949.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, J., Grudzinskas, G., and Johnson, M.H., Embryonic DNA sampling without biopsy: the beginnings of non-invasive PGD?, Reprod. Biomed. Online, 2013, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 520–521.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gianaroli, L., Magli, M.C., Pomante, A., et al., Blastocentesis: a source of DNA for preimplantation genetic testing: results from a pilot study, Fertil. Steril., 2014, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 1692–1699.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Watson, A.J. and Barcroft, L.C., Regulation of blastocyst formation, Front. Biosci., 2001, vol. 6, pp. D708–D730.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barcroft, L.C., Moseley, A.E., Lingrel, J.B., and Watson, A.J., Deletion of the Na/K-ATPase α1-subunit gene (Atp1a1) does not prevent cavitation of the preimplantation mouse embryo, Mech. Dev., 2004, vol. 121, no. 5, pp. 417–426.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barcroft, L.C., Offenberg, H., Thomsen, P., and Watson, A.J., Aquaporin proteins in murine trophectoderm mediate transepithelial water movements during cavitation, Dev. Biol., 2003, vol. 256, no. 2, pp. 342–354.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang, E.M., Han, J.E., Kim, Y.S., et al., Use of the natural cycle and vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer results in better in vitro fertilization outcomes: cycle regimens of vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer, J. Assist. Reprod. Genet., 2011, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 369–374.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu, D., Zhang, J., Cao, S., et al., Vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles yield higher pregnancy and implantation rates compared with fresh blastocyst transfer cycles—time for a new embryo transfer strategy?, Fertil. Steril., 2011, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 1691–1695.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jurisicova, A., Varmuza, S., and Casper, R.F., Involvement of programmed cell death in preimplantation embryo demise, Hum. Reprod. Update, 1995, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 558–566.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Parr, E.L., Tung, H.N., and Parr, M.B., Apoptosis as the mode of uterine epithelial cell death during embryo implantation in mice and rats, Biol. Reprod., 1987, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 211–225.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Welsh, A.O. and Enders, A.C., Chorioallontoic placenta formation in the rat: 3. Granulated cells invade the uterine luminal epithelium at the time of epithelial cell death, Biol. Reprod., 1993, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 38–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hardy, K., Apoptosis in the human embryo, Rev. Reprod., 1999, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 125–134.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Alfarawati, S., Fragouli, E., Colls, P., et al., The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender, Fertil. Steril., 2011, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 520–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Harton, G., Braude, P., Lashwood, A., et al., ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for organization of a PGD center for PGD/preimplantation genetic screening, Hum. Reprod., 2011, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 14–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuliev, A. and Verlinsky, Y., Meiotic and mitotic nondisjunction: lessons from preimplantation genetic diagnosis, Hum. Reprod. Update, 2004, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 401–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Herrera, C., Morikawa, M.I., Castex, C.B., et al., Blastocoel fluid from in vitroand in vivo-produced equine embryos contains nuclear DNA, Theriogenology, 2015, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 415–420.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bielanska, M., Tan, S.L., and Ao, A., Chromosomal mosaicism throughout human preimplantation development in vitro, incidence, type, and relevance to embryo outcome, Hum. Reprod., 2002, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 413–419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruangvutilert, P., Delhanty, J.D.A., Rodeck, C., and Harper, J.C., Relative efficiency of fish on metaphase and interphase nuclei from nonmosaic trisomic or triploid fibroblast cultures, Prenatal Diagn., 2000, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 159–162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Coonen, E., Derhaag, J.G., Dumoulin, J.C., et al., Anaphase lagging mainly explains chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos, Hum. Reprod., 2004, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 316–324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bielanska, M., Jin, S., Bernier, M., et al., Diploid-aneuploid mosaicism in human embryos cultured to the blastocyst stage, Fertil. Steril., 2005, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 336–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Daphnis, D.D., Delhanty, J.D.A., Jerkovic, S., et al., Detailed fish analysis of day 5 human embryos reveals the mechanisms leading to mosaic aneuploidy, Hum. Reprod., 2005, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 129–137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Los, F.J., Van Opstal, D., and Berg, C., The development of cytogenetically normal, abnormal and mosaic embryos: a theoretical model, Hum. Reprod. Update, 2004, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 79–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lebedev, I.N. and Nazarenko, S.A., Tissue-specific placental mosaicism for autosomal trisomies in human spontaneous abortuses: mechanisms of formation and phenotypical effects, Russ. J. Genet., 2001, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1224–1237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lebedev, I., Mosaic aneuploidy in early fetal losses, Cytogenet. Genome Res., 2011, vol. 133, nos. 2–4, pp. 169–183.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chang, L.J., Chen, S.U., Tsai, Y.Y., et al., An update of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in gene diseases, chromosomal translocation, and aneuploidy screening, Clin. Exp. Reprod. Med., 2011, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 126–134.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Romanova, N.V., Smol’nikova, V.Yu., Glinkina, Zh.I., and Kuz’michev, L.N., PGD and selective single embryo transfer, Probl. Reprod., 2010, vol. 6, pp. 75–78.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fragouli, E., Katz-Jaffe, M., Alfarawati, S., et al., Comprehensive chromosome screening of polar bodies and blastocysts from couples experiencing repeated implantation failure, Fertil. Steril., 2010, vol. 94, pp. 875–887.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sandalinas, M., Sadowy, S., Alikani, M., et al., Development ability of chromosomally abnormal human embryos to develop to the blastocyst stage, Hum. Reprod., 2001, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1954–1958.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. McArthur, S.J., Leigh, D., Marshall, J.T., et al., Pregnancies and live births after trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing of human blastocysts, Fertil. Steril., 2005, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 1628–1636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cohen, J., Wells, D., and Munné, S., Removal of 2 cells from cleavage stage embryos is likely to reduce the efficacy of chromosomal tests that are used to enhance implantation rates, Fertil. Steril., 2007, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 496–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to D. I. Zhigalina or N. A. Skryabin.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © D.I. Zhigalina, N.A. Skryabin, V.G. Artyukhova, A.V. Svetlakov, I.N. Lebedev, 2016, published in Genetika, 2016, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 5–13.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhigalina, D.I., Skryabin, N.A., Artyukhova, V.G. et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis by blastocentesis: Problems and perspectives. Russ J Genet 52, 1–7 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795416010154

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795416010154

Keywords

Navigation