Skip to main content
Log in

The bithorax complex of Drosophila melanogaster as a model for studying specific long-distance interactions between enhancers and promoters

  • Reviews and Theoretical Articles
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In higher eukaryotes regulation of the expression of genes responsible for the development of the organism is a complex process. Often, a single gene may be regulated in different cells and time intervals with the help of dozens of enhancers and promoters. It has recently become clear that enhancers directly interact with target promoters, and the intervening chromatin loops out. However, the mechanisms that ensure the specificity of long-distance interactions between enhancers and promoters remain unclear. One of the most convenient models for the study of remote interactions between the regulatory elements is the bithorax complex (BX-C) of Drosophila melanogaster. This review describes the regulation of the expression of the BX-C homeotic genes and discusses the existing models that explain the specificity of remote interactions between the enhancers and promoters at this locus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bulger, M. and Groudine, M., Functional and mechanistic diversity of distal transcription enhancers, Cell, 2011, vol. 1, pp. 327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. de Laat, W. and Duboule, D., Topology of mammalian developmental enhancers and their regulatory landscapes, Nature, 2013, vol. 502, pp. 499–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wendt, K.S. and Grosveld, F.G., Transcription in the context of the 3D nucleus, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 2014, vol. 25, pp. 62–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maksimenko, O. and Georgiev, P., Mechanisms and proteins involved in long-distance interactions, Front. Genet., 2014, vol. 5, p. 28.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Maeda, R.K. and Karch, F., The bithorax complex of Drosophila an exceptional Hox cluster, Curr. Top. Dev. Biol., 2009, vol. 88, pp. 1–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Karch, F., Galloni, M., Sipos, L., et al., Mcp and Fab-7: molecular analysis of putative boundaries of cis-regulatory domains in the bithorax complex of Drosophila melanogaster, Nucleic Acids Res., 1994, vol. 22, pp. 3138–3146.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hagstrom, K., Muller, M., and Schedl, P., Fab-7 functions as a chromatin domain boundary to ensure proper segment specification by the Drosophila bithorax complex, Genes Dev., 1996, vol. 10, pp. 3202–3215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou, J., Barolo, S., Szymanski, P., et al., The Fab-7 element of the bithorax complex attenuates enhancerpromoter interactions in the Drosophila embryo, Genes Dev., 1996, vol. 10, pp. 3195–3201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barges, S., Mihaly, J., Galloni, M., et al., The Fab-8 boundary defines the distal limit of the bithorax complex iab-7 domain and insulated iab-7 from initiation elements and a PRE in the adjacent iab-8 domain, Development, 2000, vol. 127, pp. 779–790.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gruzdeva, N., Kyrchanova, O., Parshikov, A., et al., The Mcp element from the bithorax complex contains an insulator that is capable of pairwise interactions and can facilitate enhancer-promoter communication, Mol. Cell. Biol., 2005, vol. 25, pp. 3682–3689.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schwartz, Y.B. and Pirrotta, V., Polycomb silencing mechanisms and the management of genomic programs, Nat. Rev. Genet., 2007, vol. 8, pp. 9–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kassis, J.A. and Brown, J.L., Polycomb group response elements in Drosophila and vertebrates, Adv. Genet., 2013, vol. 81, pp. 83–118.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Peel, A.D., Chipman, A.D., and Akam, M., Arthropod segmentation: beyond the Drosophila paradigm, Nat. Rev. Genet., 2005, vol. 6, pp. 905–916.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pankratz, M.J. and Jäckle, H., Making stripes in the Drosophila embryo, Trends Genet., 1990, vol. 6, pp. 287–292.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Small, S. and Levine, M., The initiation of pair-rule stripes in the Drosophila blastoderm, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 1991, vol. 1, pp. 255–260.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maeda, R.K. and Karch, F., The ABC of the BX-C: the bithorax complex explained, Development, 2006, vol. 133, pp. 1413–1422.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hughes, C.L. and Kaufman, T.C., Hox genes and the evolution of the arthropod body plan, Evol. Dev., 2002, vol. 4, pp. 459–499.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lewis, E.B., A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila, Nature, 1978, vol. 276, pp. 565–570.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mihaly, J., Hogga, I., Barges, S., et al., Chromatin domain boundaries in the Bithorax complex, Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 1998, vol. 54, pp. 60–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Castelli-Gair, J. and Akam, M., How the Hox gene Ultrabithorax specifies two different segments: the significance of spatial and temporal regulation within metameres, Development, 1995, vol. 121, no. 9, pp. 2973–2982.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Karch, F., Weiffenbach, B., Peifer, M., et al., The abdominal region of the bithorax complex, Cell, 1985, vol. 43, pp. 81–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Karch, F., Bender, W., and Weiffenbach, B., abd-A expression in Drosophila embryos, Genes Dev., 1990, vol. 4, pp. 1573–1587.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Simon, J., Peifer, M., Bender, W., et al., Regulatory elements of the bithorax complex that control expression along the anterior-posterior axis, EMBO J., 1990, vol. 9, pp. 3945–3956.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gummalla, M., Maeda, R.K., Castro Alvarez, J.J., et al., abd-A regulation by the iab-8 noncoding RNA, PLoS Genet., 2012, vol. 8. e1002720

  25. Maeda, R.K. and Karch, F., Gene expression in time and space: additive vs hierarchical organization of cisregulatory regions, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 2011, vol. 21, pp. 187–193.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mihaly, J., Barges, S., Sipos, L., et al., Dissecting the regulatory landscape of the Abd-B gene of the bithorax complex, Development, 2006, vol. 133, pp. 2983–2993.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Iampietro, C., Gummalla, M., Mutero, A., et al., Initiator elements function to determine the activity state of BX-C enhancers, PLoS Genet., 2010, vol. 6, no. 12. e1001260

    Google Scholar 

  28. Qian, S., Capovilla, M., and Pirrotta, V., The bx region enhancer, a distant cis-control element of the Drosophila Ubx gene and its regulation by hunchback and other segmentation genes, EMBO J., 1991, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1415–1425.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Busturia, A., Wightman, C.D., and Sakonju, S., A silencer is required for maintenance of transcriptional repression throughout Drosophila development, Development, 1997, vol. 124, pp. 4343–4350.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Busturia, A. and Bienz, M., Silencers in abdominal-B, a homeotic Drosophila gene, EMBO J., 1993, vol. 12, pp. 1415–1425.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bowman, S.K., Deaton, A.M., Domingues, H., et al., H3K27 modifications define segmental regulatory domains in the Drosophila bithorax complex, Elife, 2014, vol. 3. e02833

  32. Mihaly, J., Hogga, I., Gausz, J., et al., In situ dissection of the Fab-7 region of the bithorax complex into a chromatin domain boundary and a Polycomb-response element, Development, 1997, vol. 124, pp. 1809–1820.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Müller, J., Hart, C.M., Francis, N.J., et al., Histone methyltransferase activity of a Drosophila Polycomb group repressor complex, Cell, 2002, vol. 111, pp. 197–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Steffen, P.A. and Ringrose, L., What are memories made of? How Polycomb and Trithorax proteins mediate epigenetic memory, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2014, vol. 15, pp. 340–356.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schwartz, Y.B. and Pirrotta, V., A new world of Polycombs: unexpected partnerships and emerging functions, Nat. Rev. Genet., 2013, vol. 14, pp. 853–864.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tie, F., Furuyama, T., Prasad-Sinha, J., et al., The Drosophila Polycomb group proteins ESC and E(Z) are present in a complex containing the histone-binding protein p55 and the histone deacetylase RPD3, Development, 2001, vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 275–286.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cao, R., Wang, L., Wang, H., et al., Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in Polycomb-group silencing, Science, 2002, vol. 298, pp. 1039–1043.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Czermin, B., Melfi, R., McCabe, D., et al., Drosophila enhancer of Zeste/ESC complexes have a histone H3 methyltransferase activity that marks chromosomal Polycomb sites, Cell, 2002, vol. 111, pp. 185–196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tillib, S., Petruk, S., Sedkov, Y., et al., Trithorax- and Polycomb-group response elements within an Ultrabithorax transcription maintenance unit consist of closely situated but separable sequences, Mol. Cell Biol., 1999, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 5189–5202.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tie, F., Banerjee, R., Saiakhova, A.R., et al., Trithorax monomethylates histone H3K4 and interacts directly with CBP to promote H3K27 acetylation and antagonize Polycomb silencing, Development, 2014, vol. 141, pp. 1129–1139.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Schuettengruber, B., Ganapathi, M., Leblanc, B., et al., Functional anatomy of Polycomb and Trithorax chromatin landscapes in Drosophila embryos, PLoS Biol., 2009, vol. 7, no. 1. e13

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bantignies, F., Grimaud, C., Lavrov, S., et al., Inheritance of Polycomb-dependent chromosomal interactions in Drosophila, Genes Dev., 2003, vol. 17, pp. 2406–2420.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Maksimenko, O.G., Chetverina, D.A., and Georgiev, P.G., Insulators of higher eukaryotes: properties, mechanisms of action, and role in transcriptional regulation, Russ. J. Genet., 2006, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 845–857.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Chetverina, D., Aoki, T., Erokhin, M., et al., Making connections: insulators organize eukaryotic chromosomes into independent cis-regulatory networks, BioEssays, 2014, vol. 36, pp. 163–172.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kyrchanova, O. and Georgiev, P., Chromatin insulators and long-distance interactions in Drosophila, FEBS Lett., 2014, vol. 588, pp. 8–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rodin, S., Kyrchanova, O., Pomerantseva, E., et al., New properties of Drosophila Fab-7 insulator, Genetics, 2007, vol. 177, pp. 113–121.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Smith, S.T., Wickramasinghe, P., Olson, A., et al., Genome wide ChIP-chip analyses reveal important roles for CTCF in Drosophila genome organization, Dev. Biol., 2009, vol. 328, pp. 518–528.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Maksimenko, O., Kyrchanova, O., Bonchuk, A., et al., Highly conserved ENY2/Sus1 protein binds to Drosophila CTCF and is required for barrier activity, Epigenetics, 2014, vol. 9, pp. 1261–1270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kyrchanova, O.V. and Georgiev, P.G., Functional interaction between an insulator and a Pc-dependent silencer by the example of the Mcp boundary of the Drosophila melanogaster Abd-B Gene, Russ. J. Genet., 2010, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 521–529.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Kyrchanova, O.V., Ivlieva, T.A., and Georgiev, P.G., Interacting insulators from the Drosophila melanogaster bithorax complex can form independent expression domains, Russ. J. Genet., 2011, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 1406–1414.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Kyrchanova, O., Toshchakov, S., Podstreshnaya, Y., et al., Study of the functional interaction between the Fab-7 and Fab-8 boundaries and the upstream promoter region in Drosophila Abd-B gene, Mol. Cell. Biol., 2008, vol. 28, pp. 4188–4195.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kyrchanova, O., Ivlieva, T., Toshchakov, S., et al., Selective interactions of boundaries with upstream region of Abd-B promoter in Drosophila bithorax complex and role of dCTCF in this process, Nucleic Acids Res., 2011, vol. 39, pp. 3042–3052.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kyrchanova, O., Chetverina, D., Maksimenko, O., et al., Orientation-dependent interaction between Drosophila insulators is a property of this class of regulatory elements, Nucleic Acids Res., 2008, vol. 36, pp. 7019–7028.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhou, J., Ashe, H., Burks, C., et al., Characterization of the transvection mediating region of the Abdominal-B locus in Drosophila, Development, 1999, vol. 126, pp. 3057–3065.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhou, J. and Levine, M., A novel cis-regulatory element, the PTS, mediates an anti-insulator activity in the Drosophila embryo, Cell, 1999, vol. 99, pp. 567–575.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lin, Q., Chen, Q., Lin, L., et al., The promoter targeting sequence mediates epigenetically heritable transcription memory, Genes Dev., 2004, vol. 18, pp. 2639–2651.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Chen, Q., Lin, L., Smith, S., et al., Multiple promoter targeting sequences exist in Abdominal-B to regulate long-range gene activation, Dev. Biol., 2005, vol. 286, pp. 629–636.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Akbari, O.S., Bae, E., Johnsen, H., et al., A novel promoter-tethering element regulates enhancer-driven gene expression at the bithorax complex in the Drosophila embryo, Development, 2008, vol. 135, pp. 123–131.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kyrchanova, O.V. and Georgiev, P.G., Drosophila Fab-7 insulator from the regulatory domain of the bithorax complex effectively blocks Polycomb-mediated repression in transgenic lines, Russ. J. Genet., 2012, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 261–267.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Herold, M., Bartkuhn, M., and Renkawitz, R., CTCF: insights into insulator function during development, Development, 2012, vol. 139, pp. 1045–1057.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Moon, H., Filippova, G., Loukinov, D., et al., CTCF is conserved from Drosophila to humans and confers enhancer blocking of the Fab-8 insulator, EMBO Rep., 2005, vol. 2, pp. 165–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Holohan, E.E., Kwong, C., Adryan, B., et al., CTCF genomic binding sites in Drosophila and the organization of the bithorax complex, PLoS Genet., 2007, vol. 3, no. 7. e112

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Ivlieva, T.A., Georgiev, P.G., and Kyrchanova, O.V., Study of the enhancer-blocking activities of new boundaries in the bithorax complex of Drosophila melanogaster, Russ. J. Genet., 2011, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1047–1051.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Mohan, M., Bartkuhn, M., Herold, M., et al., The Drosophila insulator proteins CTCF and CP190 link enhancer blocking to body patterning, EMBO J., 2007, vol. 26, pp. 4203–4214.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Moshkovich, N., Nisha, P., Boyle, P.J., et al., RNAi-independent role for Argonaute2 in CTCF/CP190 chromatin insulator function, Genes Dev., 2011, vol. 25, pp. 1686–1701.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Sexton, T., Yaffe, E., Kenigsberg, E., et al., Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome, Cell, 2012, vol. 148, pp. 458–472.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Maksimenko, O., Bartkuhn, M., Stakhov, V., et al., Two new insulator proteins, Pita and ZIPIC, target CP190 to chromatin, Genome Res., 2014. pii: gr.174169.114

    Google Scholar 

  68. Kyrchanova, O., Toshchakov, S., Parshikov, A., et al., Study of the functional interaction between Mcp insulators from the Drosophila bithorax complex: effects of insulator pairing on the enhancer-promoter communication, Mol. Cell. Biol., 2007, vol. 27, pp. 3035–3043.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Muller, M., Hangstrom, K., Gyurkovics, H., et al., The Mcp element from the Drosophila melanogaster bithorax complex mediates long-distance regulatory interactions, Genetics, 1999, vol. 153, pp. 1333–1356.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Li, H.B., Muller, M., Bahechar, I.A., et al., Insulators, not Polycomb Response Elements, are required for long-distance interactions between Polycomb targets in Drosophila, Mol. Cell. Biol., 2011, vol. 31, pp. 616–625.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Iampietro, C., Célard, F., Gyurkovics, H., et al., Boundary swapping in the Drosophila bithorax complex, Development, 2008, vol. 135, pp. 3983–3987.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. G. Georgiev.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © O.V. Kyrchanova, P.G. Georgiev, 2015, published in Genetika, 2015, Vol. 51, No. 5, pp. 529–538.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kyrchanova, O.V., Georgiev, P.G. The bithorax complex of Drosophila melanogaster as a model for studying specific long-distance interactions between enhancers and promoters. Russ J Genet 51, 440–448 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795415050038

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795415050038

Keywords

Navigation