Abstract
Fine regulation of complex gene loci in higher eukaryotes is realized through the interaction of promoters with enhancers and repressors, which can be located long distance from the promoter regulated. A question arises, what mechanisms determine proper contacts between the regulatory elements over large distances in the genome. It is suggested that the important role in this process is played by a special class of regulatory elements, insulators, which block the interaction of enhancer and promoter, if they are positioned between them. Furthermore, enhancers do not directly inactivate the activities of enhancer and promoter. Nevertheless, an enhancer, isolated from one of the promoters by an insulator, can activate another, not isolated promoter. The best studied insulator of Drosophila melanogaster was found in the 5′ regulatory region of retrotransposon MDG4. It consists of 12 binding sites for the Su(Hw) protein, which is critical for the activity of this insulator. It was demonstrated that Su(Hw) insulator could protect the gene expression from the negative influence of heterochromatin and from repression, induced by the Polycomb group proteins (Pc proteins). In the present study, it was demonstrated that in transgenic lines, two or three copies of the Su(Hw) insulator could determine the interaction of the miniwhite enhancer and Pc dependant silencer with the miniwhite promoter. Thus, it was first demonstrated that insulators could participate in the regulation of the contacts between promoter and functionally opposite elements, responsible for either gene activation, or repression.
References
Mihaly, J., Hogga, I., Barges, S., et al., Chromatin Domain Boundaries in the Bithorax Complex, Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 1998, vol. 54, pp. 60–70.
Boulet, A.M., Lloyd, A., and Sakonju, S., Molecular Definition of the Morphogenetic and Regulatory Functions and the cis-Regulatory Elements of the Drosophila Abd-B Homeotic Gene, Development, 1991, vol. 111, pp. 393–405.
Kennison, J., The Polycomb and Trithorax Group Proteins of Drosophila: trans-Regulators of Homeotic Gene Function, Ann. Rev. Genet., 1995, vol. 29, pp. 289–303.
Mahmoudi, T., and Verrijzer, C., Chromatin Silencing and Activation by Polycomb and Trithorax Group Proteins, Oncogene, 2001, vol. 20, pp. 3055–3066.
Barges, S., Mihaly, J., Galloni, M., et al., The Fab-8 Boundary Defines the Distal Limit of the Bithorax Complex iab-7 Domain and Insulates iab-7 from Initiation Elements and a PRE in the Adjacent iab-8 Domain, Development, 2000, vol. 127, pp. 779–790.
Mihaly, J., Barges, S., Sipos, L., et al., Dissecting the Regulatory Landscape of the Abd-B Gene of the Bithorax Complex, Development, 2006, vol. 133, pp. 2983–2993.
Qian, S. and Pirrotta, V., Dosage Compensation of the Drosophila White Gene Requires Both the X Chromosome Environment and Multiple Intragenic Elements, Genetics, 1995, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 733–744.
Chan, C., Rastelli, L., and Pirrotta, V.A., Polycomb Response Element in the Ubx Gene That Determines an Epigenetically Inherited State of Repression, EMBO J., 1994, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 2553–2564.
Comet, I., Savitskaya, E., Schuettengruber, B., et al., PRE-Mediated Bypass of Two Su(Hw) Insulators Targets PcG Proteins to a Downstream Promoter, Dev. Cell, 2006, vol. 11, pp. 117–124.
Savitskaya, E., Melnikova, L., Kostuchenko, M., et al., Study of Long-Distance Functional Interactions between Su(Hw) Insulators That Can Regulate Enhancer-Promoter Communication in Drosophila melanogaster, Mol. Cell. Biol., 2006, vol. 26, pp. 754–761.
Qian, S., Varjavand, B., and Pirrotta, V., Molecular Analysis of the Zeste-White Interaction Reveals a Promoter-Proximal Element Essential for Distant Enhancer-Promoter Communication, Genetics, 1992, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 79–90.
Geyer, P. and Corces, V., Separate Regulatory Elements Are Responsible for the Complex Pattern of Tissue-Specific and Developmental Transcription of the yellow Locus in Drosophila melanogaster, Genes Dev., 1987, vol. 1, pp. 996–1004.
Siegal, M. and Hartl, D., Application of Cre/loxP in Drosophila: Site-Specific Recombination and Transgene Coplacement, Methods Mol. Biol., 2000, vol. 136, pp. 487–495.
Golic, K. and Lindquist, S., The FLP Recombinase of Yeast Catalyzes Site-Specific Recombination in the Drosophila Genome, Cell, 1989, vol. 59, pp. 499–509.
Kares, R. and Rubin, G., Analysis of P Transposable Element Functions in Drosophila, Cell, 1984, vol. 38, pp. 135–146.
Georgiev, P. and Kozycina, M., Interaction between Mutations in the suppressor of Hairy wing and modifier of mdg4 Genes of Drosophila melanogaster Affecting the Phenotype of hypsy-induced Mutations, Genetics, 1996, vol. 142, pp. 425–436.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © M.V. Kostyuchenko, E.E. Savitskaya, M.N. Krivega, P.G. Georgiev, 2008, published in Genetika, 2008, Vol. 44, No. 12, pp. 1693–1697.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kostyuchenko, M.V., Savitskaya, E.E., Krivega, M.N. et al. Several copies of insulator from MDG4 can determine the interaction between positively and negatively acting regulatory elements and promoter of the miniwhite gene of Drosophila melanogaster . Russ J Genet 44, 1468–1471 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795408120120
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795408120120