Abstract
Geptrong is a medication from pure defermentated honey. In medical practice, it is used as hepatoprotector. Genotoxicity analysis revealed antimutagenic activity of the preparation. The spontaneous mutation rate at the ADE4-ADE8 and CAN1 loci was several times lower in case that the yeast cells were plated on the geptrong-containing medium, and the mutation rate was scored using the method of ordered plating. If spontaneous mutation rate was measured by means of the fluctuation method of median, no antimutagenic activity was detected. Geptrong had no effect on the yeast cell survival. At the same time, it substantially decreased the frequency of direct mutations at the ADE4-ADE8 locus, induced by UV-and gamma-radiation, and ethylmetansulfonate. The effect of the geptrong antimutagenic activity on the level of UV-induced mutagenesis in the yeast strains defective for the repair systems rad2, rad51, rad54, rad59, msh2, and hsm3 was examined. Antimutagenic activity was detected in the wild type, as well as in the rad2, rad54, rad59, and hsm3 strains, while rad51, pms1, and msh2 mutants lacked this activity. Based on these data, it is suggested that antimutagenic effect of geptrong is associated with activated repair of mismatches, appeared during the postreplicative recombination repair.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Novick, A. and Szilard, L., Anti-Mutagens, Nature, 1952, vol. 170, pp. 926–927.
Clarke, C.H. and Shankel, D.M., Antimutagenesis in Microbial Systems, Bacteriol. Rev., 1975, vol. 38, pp. 33–53.
de Flora, S., Bronzetti, G., and Sobels, F.H., Assessment of Antimutagenicity and Anticarcinogenicity: End-Points and Systems, Mutat. Res., 1992, vol. 267, pp. 153–298.
von Borstel, R.C., Drake, J.W., and Loeb, L.H., Mechanisms of Antimutagenesis and Anticarcinogenesis, Mutat. Res., 1996, vol. 350, pp. 1–293.
Fergusson, L.R., Bonzetti, G., and de Flora, S., Mechanistic Approaches to Chemoprevention of Mutation and Cancer, Mutat. Res., 2005, vol. 591, pp. 3–7.
Kuroda, Y. and Inoue, T., Antimutagenesis by Factors Affecting DNA Repair in Bacteria, Mutat. Res., 1988, vol. 202, pp. 387–391.
Ohta, T., Watanabe, M., Shirasu, Y., and Inoue, T., Post-Replication Repair and Recombination in uvrA umuC Strains of Escherichia coli Are Enhanced by Vanillin, an Antimutagenic Compound, Mutat. Res., 1988, vol. 201, pp. 107–112.
Mure, K. and Rossman, T.G., Reduction of Spontaneous Mutagenesis in Mismatch Repair-Deficient and Proficient Cells by Dietary Antioxidants, Mutat. Res., 2001, vol. 480–481, pp. 85–95.
Fedorova, I.V., Gracheva, L.M., Kovaltzova, S.V., et al., The Yeast HSM3 Gene Acts in One of the Mismatch Repair Pathways, Genetics, 1998, vol. 148, pp. 963–973.
Alekseev, S.Yu., Kovaltsova, S.V., Fedorova, I.V., et al., HSM2 (HMO1) Gene Participates in Mutagenesis Control in Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, DNA Repair, 2002, vol. 1, pp. 287–297.
Kelberg, E.P., Kovaltsova, S.V., Alekseev, S.Y., et al., HIM1, a New Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Gene Playing a Role in Control of Spontaneous and Induced Mutagenesis, Mutat. Res., 2005, vol. 578, pp. 64–78.
Fedorova, I.V., Kovaltzova, S.V., Gracheva, L.M., et al., Requirement of HSM3 Gene for Spontaneous Mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mutat. Res., 2004, vol. 554, pp. 65–75.
Ivanov, E.L., Kovaltzova, S.V., and Korolev, V.G., Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mutants with Enhanced Induced Mutation and Altered Mitotic Gene Conversion, Mutat. Res., 1989, vol. 213, pp. 105–115.
Zakharov, I.A., Kovaltsova, S.V., and Marfin, S.V., Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains for the Study of Induced Mutagenesis and Recombination, Genetika (Moscow), 1979, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 41–48.
Zakharov, I.A., Kozhin, S.A., Kozhina, T.A., and Fedorova, I.V., Sbornik metodik po genetike drozhzheisakharomitsetov, (Collection of Methods on Genetics of Saccharomycetes Yeast), Leningrad: Nauka, 1984.
Kovaltsova, S.V. and Korolev, V.G., The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast Strains for Testing Environmental Mutagens Based on the Interaction between rad2 and him1 Mutations, Russ. J. Genet., 1996, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 316–321.
Roman, H., A System Selective for Mutations Affecting the Synthesis of Adenine in Yeast, Compt. Rend. Trav. Lab. Carlsberg. Ser. Physiol., 1956, vol. 26, pp. 299–314.
Lea, D.E. and Coulson, C.A., The Distribution of the Number of Mutants in Bacterial Populations, J. Genet., 1949, vol. 49, pp. 264–285.
Khromov-Borisov, N.N., Saffi, J., and Henriques, J.A.P., Perfect Order Plating: Principal and Applications, TTO, 2002, vol. 1, p. TO2638.
Koval’tsova, S.V., Gracheva, L.M., Evstyukhina, T.A., et al., Mutator Genes of the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Interaction between Mutations him and hsm and Mutations Blocking Three Principal Pathways of Induced DNA Damage Repair, Russ. J. Genet., 1996, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 921–927.
Modrich, P., Mechanisms in Eukaryotic Mismatch Repair, J. Biol. Chem., 2006, vol. 281, pp. 30305–30309.
Habraken, Y., Sung, P., Prakash, L., and Prakash, S., Yeast Excision Repair Gene RAD2 Encodes a Single-Stranded DNA Endonuclease, Nature, 1993, vol. 366, pp. 365–368.
Shinohara, A., Ogawa, H., and Ogawa, T., Rad51 Protein Involved in Repair and Recombination in S. cerevisiae Is a RecA-Like Protein, Cell, 1992, vol. 69, pp. 457–470.
Heyer, W.-D., Li, X., Rolfsmeier, M., and Zhang, X.-P., Rad54: The Swiss Army Knife of Homologous Recombination?, Nucleic Acids Res., 2006, vol. 34, pp. 4115–4125.
Bai, Y. and Symington, L.S., A Rad52 Homolog Is Required for RAD51-Independent Mitotic Recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Genes Dev., 1996, vol. 10, pp. 2025–2037.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © S.V. Kovaltsova, I.V. Fedorova, L.M. Gracheva, S.A. Mashistov, V.G. Korolev, 2008, published in Genetika, 2008, Vol. 44, No. 11, pp. 1468–1476.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kovaltsova, S.V., Fedorova, I.V., Gracheva, L.M. et al. The geptrong pharmaceutical product increases efficiency of postreplication repair of permutation intermediates in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Russ J Genet 44, 1272–1279 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795408110045
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795408110045