Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution of errantiviruses of Drosophila melanogaster. Strategy 2: From retroviruses to retrotransposons

  • General Genetics
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster retrotransposons of the gypsy group are considered to be potential errantiviruses. Their infectivity is caused by the functional activity of the third open reading frame (ORF3) encoding the Env protein, which was probably captured from baculoviruses. Mobile genetic elements (MGEs) of the gypsy group can be conventionally divided into three subgroups: with three ORFs, with a defective ORF3, and without the ORF3. To establish the patterns of evolution of gypsy retrotransposons in D. melanogaster, the members of the three subgroups were examined. Structural analysis of retrotransposons opus and rover, which carry a defective ORF3, as well as retrotransposons Burdock, McClintock, qbert, and HMS-Beagle, which lack the ORF3, suggests that the evolution of these MGEs followed the pattern of loosing the ORF3. At the same time, an MGE of the same subgroup, Transpac, may be an ancestral form, which had acquired the env gene and gave rise to the first errantiviruses. The capture of the ORF3 by retrotransposons provided their conversion to a fundamentally new state. However, the ORF3 in the genome is not subjected to strong selective pressure, because it is not essential for intragenomic transpositions. Because of this, the process of its gradual loss seems quite natural.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hardman, N., Structure and Function of Repetitive DNA in Eukaryotes, Biochem. J., 1986, vol. 234, no. 1, pp. 1–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Temin, H.M., Origin of Retroviruses from Cellular Moveable Genetic Elements, Cell, 1980, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 599–600.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Flavell, A.J., Retroelements, Reverse Transcriptase and Evolution, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B. Biochem. Mol. Biol., 1995, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 3–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Song, S.U., Kurkulos, M., Boeke, J.D., and Corces, V.G., Infection of the Germ Line by Retroviral Particles Produced in the Follicle Cells: A Possible Mechanism for the Mobilization of the gypsy Retroelement of Drosophila, Development, 1997, vol. 124, no. 14, pp. 2789–2798.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim, A.I., Lyubomirskaya, N.V., Belyaeva, E.S., et al., The Introduction of Transposionally Active Copy of a Retrotransposon gypsy into the Stable Strain of Drosophila melanogaster, Mol. Gen. Genet., 1994, vol. 242, no. 4, pp. 472–477.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Leblanc, P., Desset, S., Giorgi, F., et al., Life Cycle of an Endogenous Retrovirus, ZAM, in Drosophila melanogaster, J. Virol., 2000, vol. 74, no. 22, pp. 10658–10669.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Boeke, J.D., Eickbush, T.H., Sandmeyer, S.B., and Voytas, D.F., Virus Taxonomy: ICTV VIIth Report, New York: Springer, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lerat, E. and Capy, P., Retrotransposons and Retroviruses: Analysis of the Envelope Gene, Mol. Biol. Evol., 1999, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1198–1207.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Laten, H.M., Havecker, E.R., Farmer, L.M., and Voytas, D.F., SIRE1, an Endogenous Retrovirus Family from Glycine max, Is Highly Homogeneous and Evolutionarily Young, Mol. Biol. Evol., 2003, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1222–1230.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaminker, J.S., Bergman, C.M., Kronmiller, B., et al., The Transposable Elements of the Drosophila melanogaster Euchromatin: a Genomics Perspective, Genome Biol., 2002, vol. 3, no. 12, RESEARCH0084.

  11. Coffin, J.M., Hughes, S.H., and Varmus, H.E., Retroviruses: Plainview, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Lab., 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Terzian, C., Pelisson, A., and Bucheton, A., Evolution and Phylogeny of Insect Endogenous Retroviruses, BMC Evol. Biol., 2001, vol. 1, p. 3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Thompson, J.D., Plewniak, F., and Poch, O., A Comprehensive Comparison of Multiple Sequence Alignment Programs, Nucleic Acids Res., 1999, vol. 27, nos. 1–3, pp. 2682–2690.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Malik, H.S., Henikoff, S., and Eickbush, T.H., Poised for Contagion: Evolutionary Origins of the Infectious Abilities of Invertebrate Retroviruses, Genome Res., 2000, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1307–1318.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mejlumian, L., Pelisson, A., Bucheton, A., and Terzian, C., Comparative and Functional Studies of Drosophila Species Invasion by the gypsy Endogenous Retrovirus, Genetics, 2002, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 201–209.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim, A.I., MDG4 (gypsy) Drosophila melanogaster Endoparasite: Regulation of Transposition and Infectivity, in Medical Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, 2007 (in press).

  17. Nefedova, L.N. and Kim, A.I., Evolution of Drosophila melanogaster Errantiviruses: From Retrotransposons to Retroviruses, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2007 (in press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. I. Kim.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © L.N. Nefedova, A.I. Kim, 2007, published in Genetika, 2007, Vol. 43, No. 10, pp. 1388–1395.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nefedova, L.N., Kim, A.I. Evolution of errantiviruses of Drosophila melanogaster. Strategy 2: From retroviruses to retrotransposons. Russ J Genet 43, 1161–1167 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795407100109

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795407100109

Keywords

Navigation