Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Pseudomonas Bacteria on Peroxidase Activity in Wheat Plants when Infected with Bipolaris sorokiniana

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Plant Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the effect of treating soft wheat seeds (Triticum aestivum L.) with two Pseudomonas bacteria strains, isolated from earthworm coprolites, showing a significant antifungal and growth-promoting action in preliminary screening on the activity of guaiacol-dependant peroxidase under phytopathogenic load in the presence of Bipolaris sorokiniana (Sacc.) Shoemaker as a mechanism for inducing plant resistance to the pathogen. We established a statistically significant decrease (P < 0.05) in root rot disease incidence and severity during bacterization, which is indicative both of antifungal activity of the used bacterial isolates and of their successful colonizing the rhizosphere of wheat plants. We noted a response of free and weakly bound peroxidase of wheat plants to infection with B. sorokiniana: the enzyme activity increased during pathogenesis. Bacterization also increased peroxidase activity in plant leaves and roots, the greatest differences from non-bacterized plants being observed in wheat roots in the presence of the pathogen. We detected a direct link between peroxidase activity in wheat roots and leaf tissues in the absence of the pathogen and the feedback between peroxidase activity and plant infestation by the root rot pathogen. In the presence of the phytopathogen, there is a lack of correlation between peroxidase activity in wheat roots and leaves, and there is a shift of activity towards its increase in roots, which plays an important role in the development of systemic resistance against the root rot pathogen that penetrates into plants through the roots and root collar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Plotnikova, L.Y., The involvement of reactive oxygen species in defense of wheat lines with the genes introgressed from Agropyron species contributing the resistance against brown rust, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2009, vol. 56, pp. 181–189.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. García-Cristobal, J., García-Villaraco, A., Ramos, B., Gutierrez-Mañero, J., and Lucas, J.A., Priming of pathogenesis related-proteins and enzymes related to oxidative stress by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on rice plants upon abiotic and biotic stress challenge, J. Plant Physiol., 2015, vol. 188, pp. 72–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Perfil'eva, A.I., Rymareva, E.V., Rikhvanov, E.G., Zhivetev, M.A., and Graskova, I.A., The activity of peroxidase in phytopathological system ring root—vegetative organs of potato plants on iodoacetic acid sodium salt and heating, Agrokhimiya, 2015, pp. 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maksimov, I.V., Valeev, A.Sh., Cherepanova, E.A., and Yarullina, L.G., Hydrogen peroxide production in wheat leaves infected with the fungus Septoria nodorum Berk. strains with different virulence, Appl. Biochem. Microbiol., 2009, vol. 45, pp. 481–486.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yarullina, L.G., Kasimova, R.I., and Akhatova, A.R., Comparison of the transcriptional activity of protective protein genes in different wheat cultivars infected with Septoria nodorum Berk., Appl. Biochem. Microbiol., 2014, vol. 50, pp. 599–603.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Manikandan, R. and Raguchander, T., Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici retardation through induction of defensive response in tomato plants using a liquid formulation of Pseudomonas fluorescens (Pf1), Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 2014, vol. 140, pp. 469–480.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Choudhary, D.K., Kasotia, A., Jain, S., Vaishnav, A., Kumari, S., Sharma, K.P., and Varma, A., Bacterial-mediated tolerance and resistance to plants under abiotic and biotic stresses, J. Plant Growth Regul., 2016, vol. 35, pp. 276–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Graskova, I.A., Borovskii, G.B., Kolesnichenko, A.V., and Voinikov, V.K., Peroxidase as a component of the signaling pathway in potato cells during ring rot infection, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2004, vol. 51, pp. 621–626.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Maksimov, I.V., Abizgil’dina, R.R., and Pusenkova, L.I., Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as alternative to chemical crop protectors from pathogens (review), Appl. Biochem. Microbiol., 2011, vol. 47, pp. 333–345.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Semenova, E.A., Dubovitskaya, L.K., and Titova, S.A., Evaluation of stability of Glycine max (L.) Merril to root rot in enzymatic activity, Russ. J. Agric. Sci., 2014, no. 2, pp. 18–20

    Google Scholar 

  11. Van Loon, L.C., Plant responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 2007, vol. 119, pp. 243–254.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hol, W.H., Bezemer, T.M., and Biere, A., Getting the ecology into interactions between plants and the plant growth-promoting bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens, Front. Plant Sci., 2013, vol. 4: 81. doi 10.3389/fpls.2013.00081

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Jankiewicz, U. and Kotonowicz, M., The involvement of Pseudomonas bacteria in induced systemic resistance in plants (review), Appl. Biochem. Microbiol., 2012, vol. 48, pp. 276–281.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pieterse, C.M.J., Zamioudis, C., Berendsen, R.L., Weller, D.M., van Wees, S.C.M., and Bakker, P.A.H.M., Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes, Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 2014, vol. 52, pp. 347–375.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jain, A. and Das, S., Insight into the interaction between plants and associated fluorescent Pseudomonas spp., Int. J. Agron., 2016, vol. 2016: 4269010. doi 10.1155/2016/4269010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maksimov, I.V., Veselova, S.V., Nuzhnaya, T.V., Sarvarova, E.R., and Khairullin, R.M., Plant growth promoting bacteria in regulation of plant resistance to stress factors, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2015, vol. 62, pp. 715–726.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Minaeva, O.M. and Akimova, E.E., Effectiveness of applying bacteria Pseudomonas sp., strain B-6798, for anti-phytopathogenic protection of crops in Western Siberia, Vestn. Tomsk Gos. Univ., Biol., 2013, no. 3, pp. 19–37 https://doi.org/vital.lib.tsu.ru/vital/access/manager/Repository/vtls:000466720

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tereshchenko, N.N., Kravets, A.V., Akimova, E.E., Minayeva, O.M., and Zotikova, A.P., Effectiveness of applying microorganisms isolated from earthworm coprolites in increasing yielding capacity of grain crops, Sib. Herald Agric. Sci., 2013, pp. 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Baslavskaya, S.S. and Trubetskova, O.M., Praktikum po fiziologii rasteniy (Practical Works on Plant Physiology), Moscow: Izd. Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cooke, B.M., Disease assessment and yield loss, in The Epidemiology of Plant Diseases, Cooke, B.M., Jone, D.G., and Kaye, B., Eds., Dordrecht: Springer, 2006, pp. 43–80.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Boyarkin, A.N., Rapid method for peroxidase activity determination, Biokhimiya, 1951, vol. 16, pp. 352–355.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang, J., Kloepper, J.W., and Ryu, Ch.M., Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress, Trends Plant Sci., 2009, vol. 14, pp. 1–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Beneduzi, A., Ambrosini, A., and Passaglia, L.M.P., Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents, Genet. Mol. Biol., 2012, vol. 35, pp. 1044–1051.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Minaeva, O.M., Apenysheva, M.V., Akimova, E.E., Blinova, P.A., and Kurowski, A.V., Influence of wheat seed inoculation on oxidase activity in plants under phytopathogenic load, Dostizheniya Nauki i Tekhniki APK, 2015, vol. 29, pp. 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Maksimov, I.V., Abizgil’dina, R.R., Yusupova, Z.R., and Khairullin, R.M., Effect of bacteria B. subtilis 26D on the content of hydrogen peroxide and peroxidase activity in winter wheat, Agrokhimiya, 2010, pp. 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Van Lelyveld, L.J. and van Vuuren, S.P., Peroxidase activity as a marker in greening disease of citrus for assessment of tolerance and susceptibility, J. Phytopathol., 1988, vol. 121, pp. 357–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Reuveni, R., Biochemical markers for disease resistance, in Molecular Methods in Plant Pathology, Singh, R.P. and Singh, U.S., Eds., Boca Raton: CRC, 1995, pp. 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. M. Minaeva.

Additional information

Published in Russian in Fiziologiya Rastenii, 2018, Vol. 65, No. 5, pp. 366–375.

The article was translated by authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Minaeva, O.M., Akimova, E.E., Tereshchenko, N.N. et al. Effect of Pseudomonas Bacteria on Peroxidase Activity in Wheat Plants when Infected with Bipolaris sorokiniana. Russ J Plant Physiol 65, 717–725 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443718040052

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443718040052

Keywords

Navigation