Skip to main content
Log in

Response of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters to drought stress in sugar beet seedlings

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Plant Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compared the parameters of chlorophyll fluorescence between two sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) species differing in drought tolerance. Our results indicated that there were different responses to the drought stress of these sugar beet species. In drought-tolerant sugar beet, the F 0 increased slightly, while qN increased substantially, indicating that these plants can protect PSII reaction centers from the damage. F v/F m and qP decreased slightly during the initial period of drought stress; this suggests that there is a slight impact of drought stress on the openness of PSII reaction centers, and thus the plants did not suffer seriously. This was further shown by the decreased Yield and electron transfer rate. The parameters of chlorophyll fluorescence were stable and can be used as an important indicator for sugar beet seedlings in the early drought tolerance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Chl:

chlorophyll

F 0 :

minimal fluorescence yield

F m :

maximal fluorescence values

F s :

steady-state Chl fluorescence

F v/F m :

maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII

ETR:

electron transport rate

Yield:

actual photochemical efficiency of PSII

qP:

photochemical quenching

qN:

non-photochemical quenching

PSII:

photosystem II

PSI:

photosystem I

References

  1. Trenberth, K., Atmospheric Moisture Residence Times and Cycling Implications for Rainfall Rates and Climate Change, Climatic Change, 1998, vol. 39, pp. 667–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li, X.B., Chen, Y.H., and Zhang, Y.X., Impact of Climate Change on Desert Steppe in Northern China, Adv. Earth Sci., 2002, vol. 17, pp. 254–261.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boyer, J.S., Plant Productivity and Environment, Science, 1982, vol. 218, pp. 443–448.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pimentel, D., Houser, J., Preiss, E., White, O., Fang, H., Mesnick, L., Barsky, T., Tariche, S., Schreck, J., and Alpert, S., Water Resources: Agriculture, the Environment and Ethics, Ecological Sustainability and Integrity, Lemon, J., Ed., Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998, pp. 104–134.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Jaggard, K.W., Dewar, A.M., and Pidgeon, J.D., The Relative Effects of Drought Stress and Virus Yellows on the Yield of Sugar Beet in the UK, 1980–1995, J. Agric. Sci., 1998, vol. 130, pp. 337–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pidgeon, J.D., Werker, A.R., Jaggard, K.W., Richter, G.M., Lister, D.H., and Jones, P.D., Climatic Impact on the Productivity of Sugar Beet in Europe, 1961–1995, Agric. Meteorol., 2001, vol. 109, p. 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones, P.D., Lister, D.H., Jaggard, K.W., and Pidgeon, J.D., Future Climate Change Impact on the Productivity of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in Europe, Climatic Change, 2003, vol. 58, pp. 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guo, W.H., Li, B., Huang, Y.M., Zhao, H.X., and Zhang, X.S., Effects of Different Water Stresses on Ecophysiological Characteristics of Hippophaer hamnoides Seedlings, Acta Bot. Sinica, 2003, vol. 45, pp. 1238–1244.

    Google Scholar 

  9. He, Y.H., Guo, L.S., and Tian, Y.L., Photosynthetic Rates and Chlorophyll Fluorescence of Nitraria tangutorum at Different Leaf Water Potentials, Acta Bot. Boreal-Occident Sinica, 2005, vol. 25, pp. 2226–2233.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ober, E.S., Bloa, M.L., Clark, C.J.A., Royal, A., Jaggard, K.W., and Pidgeon, J.D., Evaluation of Physiological Traits as Indirect Selection Criteria for Drought Tolerance in Sugar Beet, Field Crops Res., 2005, vol. 91, pp. 231–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Krause, G.H. and Weis, E., Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Photosynthesis: The Basics, Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 1991, vol. 42, pp. 313–349.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, S.R., A Discussion on Chlorophyll Fluorescence Kinetics Parameters and Their Significance, Chin. Bull. Bot., 1999, vol. 16, pp. 444–448.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Binder, W.D. and Fielder, P., Chlorophyll Fluorescence as an Indicator of Frost Hardiness in White Spruce Seedlings from Different Latitudes, New Forests, 1996, vol. 11, pp. 233–253.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maxwell, K. and Johnson, G.N., Chlorophyll Fluorescence: A Practical Guide, J. Exp. Bot., 2000, vol. 51, pp. 659–668.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ehlert, B. and Hinvha, D.K., Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging Accurately Quantifies Freezing Damage and Cold Acclimation Responses in Arabidopsis Leaves, Plant Methods, 2008, vol. 4, pp. 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Kooten, K.O. and Snel, J.F.H., The Use of Chlorophyll Nomenclature in Plant Stress Physiology, Photosynth. Res., 1990, vol. 25, pp. 147–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu, C.C., Jeon, J.A., and Lee, C.H., Relative Contributions of Photochemical and Non-Photochemical Routes to Excitation Energy Dissipation in Rice and Barley Illuminated at a Chilling Temperature, Physiol. Plant., 1999, vol. 107, pp. 447–453.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Krall, J.P. and Edward, G.E., Relationship between Photosystem II Activity and CO2 Fixation in Leaves, Physiol. Plant., 1992, vol. 86, pp. 180–187.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Martínez-Carrasco, R., Sánchez-Rodriguez, J., and Pérez, P., Changes in Chlorophyll Fluorescence during the Course of Photoperiod and in Response to Drought in Casuarina equisetifolia Forst. and Forst, Photosynthetica, 2002, vol. 40, pp. 363–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Michal, K., David, K., and Ladislav, N., On the Relation between the Non-Photochemical Quenching of Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Photosystem I Light Harvesting Efficiency — a Repetitive Flash Fluorescence Induction Study, Photosynth. Res., 2001, vol. 68, pp. 571–576.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Björkman, O. and Demmig, B., Photon Yield of O2 Evolution and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics at 77K among Vascular Plants of Diverse Origins, Planta, 1987, vol. 170, pp. 489–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hampton, J.G. and Tekrony, D.M., Handbook of Seed Vigour Test Methods, Zurich (Switzerland): International Seed Testing Association, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Golding, A.J. and Johnson, G.N., Down-Regulation of Linear and Activation of Cyclic Electron Transport during Drought, Planta, 2003, vol. 218, pp. 107–114.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Saǧlam, A., Saruhan, N., Terzi, R., and Kadioǧlu, A., The Relations between Antioxidant Enzymes and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters in Common Bean Cultivars Differing in Sensitivity to Drought Stress, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2011, vol. 58, pp. 60–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, L.P., Jing, Q., Dai, T.B., Jiang, D., and Cao, W.X., Effects of Temperature and Illumination on Flag Leaf Photosynthetic Characteristics and Senescence of Wheat Cultivars with Different Grain Quality, Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2008, vol. 19, pp. 311–316.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. L. Li.

Additional information

This text was submitted by the authors in English.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, G.L., Wu, H.X., Sun, Y.Q. et al. Response of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters to drought stress in sugar beet seedlings. Russ J Plant Physiol 60, 337–342 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443713020155

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443713020155

Keywords

Navigation