Abstract
Barley seedlings (Hordeum vulgare L.) were grown on porous plates submerged in Knop medium at pH 6.0 (control) and in a similar nutrient solution where NO −3 was replaced with Cl− (treatment); in some treatments Mes buffer (10–20 mM, pH 6.0) was added to the medium. In the absence of buffer, the pH of the medium shifted towards the alkaline region in the presence of NO −3 and to the acidic region in the presence of Cl−, with the total shift of no more than 0.3 pH units per day. The replacement of NO −3 with Cl− (in a buffer-free medium) decreased the hydraulic membrane conductance of rhizodermal cells (L p) within a 4-h period; after one day L p settled at approximately 50% of its initial value observed in untreated plants. When the removal of nitrate from the medium was accompanied by the addition of buffer, no changes in L p were observed over a 1-day period. The perfusion of external solution (at a rate of 10 mm/s) made it possible to control pH in the proximity to root surface (pHs). These experiments showed that L p was independent of the surface pH in the pHs range 7.0–5.0, whereas at pHs = 4.5 L p decreased within 15 min to a steady-state level of about 50% of the control value. It is concluded that the reduction of L p under nitrate deficit was related to acidification of the medium near the root surface. The acidic pH shift could be caused by the cessation of proton/nitrate symport and by activation of the plasmalemma H+-pump, related to changes in the cytosolic pH-stat.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- L p :
-
hydraulic membrane conductance of rhizodermal cells
- pHc :
-
cytosolic pH
- pHloc :
-
local pH
- pHout :
-
pH of external medium
- pHs :
-
pH at the root surface
- UL:
-
unstirred layer near the root surface
References
Chapin, F.S., Walter, C.H.S., and Clarkson, D.T., Growth Response of Barley and Tomato to Nitrogen Stress and Its Control by Abscisic Acid, Water Relations and Photosynthesis, Planta, 1988, vol. 173, pp. 352–366.
Clarkson, D.T., Carvajal, M., Henzler, T., Waterhouse, R.N., Smyth, A.J., Cooke, D.T., and Steudle, E., Root Hydraulic Conductance: Diurnal Aquaporin Expression and the Effects of Nutrient Stress, J. Exp. Bot., 2000, vol. 51, pp. 61–70.
Ktitorova, I.N. and Skobeleva, O.V., Changes in Elastic Properties of Cell Walls and Some Parameters of Plant Water Relations in Response to Acidification of the Medium, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 1999, vol. 46, pp. 201–206.
Libourel, I.G.L., van Bodegom, P.M., Fricker, M.D., and Ratcliffe, R.G., Nitrite Reduces Cytoplasmic Acidosis under Anoxia, Plant Physiol., 2006, vol. 142, pp. 1710–1717.
Marchner, H., Romheld, V., and Ossenberg-Neuhaus, H., Rapid Method for Measuring Changes in pH and Reducing Processes along Roots of Intact Plants, Z. Pflanzenphysiol., 1982, vol. 105, pp. 407–416.
Ktitorova, I.N., Skobeleva, O.V., Sharova, E.I., and Ermakov, E.I., Hydrogen Peroxide Appears to Mediate a Decrease in Hydraulic Conductivity in Wheat Roots under Salt Stress, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2002, vol. 49, pp. 369–380.
Peters, W.S. and Felle, H.H., The Correlation of Profiles of Surface pH and Elongation Growth in Maize Roots, Plant Physiol., 1999, vol. 121, pp. 905–912.
Antonenko, Yu.N. and Yaguzhinskii, L.S., Unmixed Layers of Model and Natural Membranes: Their Role in Transport Processes, Biologicheskie membrani i membranoaktivnie soedineniya (Biological Membranes and Membrane-Bound Compounds), Tashmukhamedov, B.A., Ed., Tashkent: FAN, 1985, pp. 84–111.
Brummer, B., Bertl, A., Potrykus, I., Felle, H., and Parish, R.W., Evidence That Fusicoccin and Indole-3-Acetic Acid Induce Cytosolic Acidification of Zea mays Cells, FEBS Lett., 1985, vol. 189, pp. 109–114.
Alekhina, N.D., Balnokin, Yu.V., Gavrilenko, V.F., Zhigalova, T.V., Nosov, A.M., and Meichik, N.R., Fiziologiya rastenii (Plant Physiology), Moscow: Academia, 2005.
Ivanov, V.B., Bystrova, E.I., and Seregin, I.V.Ç Comparative Impacts of Heavy Metals on Root Growth as Related to Their Specificity and Selectivity, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2003, vol. 50, pp. 398–406.
Mesenko, M.M. and Ivanov, V.B. The Effects of H+-ATPase Activator and Inhibitors on Cell Growth in the Maize Root, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2005, vol. 52, pp. 497–503.
Shan’ko, A.V., Mesenko, M.M., Klychnikov, O.I., Nosov, A.V., and Ivanov, V.B. Activity of Proton Pump in the Growing Part of the Maize Root: Correlation with 14-3-3 Proteins and Changes under Osmotic Stress, Biokhimiya, 2003, vol. 68, pp. 1639–1647.
Nye, P.H. and Tinker, P.B., Solute Movement in Soil-Root System), Oxford: Blackwell, 1977.
Van der Leij, M., Smith, S.J., and Miller, A.J., Remobilization of Vacuolar Stored Nitrate in Barley Root Cells, Planta, 1998, vol. 205, pp. 64–72.
Ulrich, C.I. and Novacky, A.J., Extra-and Intracellular pH and Membrane Potential Changes Induced by K+, Cl−, H2PO −4 , and NO −3 Uptake and Fusicoccin in Root Hairs of Limnobium stoloniferum, Plant Physiol., 1990, vol. 94, pp. 1561–1567.
Luo, H., Morsomme, P., and Boutry, M., The Two Major Types of Plant Plasma Membrane H+-ATPases Show Different Enzymatic Properties and Confer Differential pH Sensitivity of Yeast Growth, Plant Physiol., 1999, vol. 119, pp. 627–634.
Gloser, V., Zwienlecki, M.A., Orians, C.M., and Holbrook, N.M., Dynamic Changes in Root Hydraulic Properties in Response to Nitrate Availability, J. Exp. Bot., 2007, vol. 58, pp. 2409–2415.
Tournaire-Roux, C., Sutka, M., Javot, H., Gout, E., Gerbeau, P., Luu, D.-T., Bligny, R., and Maurel, Ch., Cytosolic pH Regulates Root Water Transport during Anoxic Stress through Gating of Aquaporins, Nature, 2003, vol. 425, pp. 393–397.
Gout, E., Boisson, A.M., Aubert, S., Douce, R., and Bligny, R., Origin of Cytoplasmic pH Changes during Anaerobic Stress in Higher Plant Cells, Plant Physiol., 2001, vol. 125, pp. 912–925.
Felle, H., pH Regulation in Anoxic Plants, Ann. Bot., 2005, vol. 96, pp. 519–532.
Kulichikin, K.Y., Aitio, O., Chirkova, T.V., and Fagerstedt, K.V., Effect of Oxygen Concentration on Intracellular pH, Glucose-6-Phosphate and NTP Content in Rice (Oryza sativa) and Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Root Tips: In Vivo P-NMR Study, Physiol. Plant., 2007, vol. 129, pp. 507–518.
Roberts, J.K.M., Andrade, F.N., and Anderson, I.C., Further Evidence That Cytoplasmic Acidosis Is Determinant of Flooding Intolerance in Plants, Plant Physiol., 1985, vol. 77, pp. 492–494.
Finkelschtein, A.V. and Ptitsin, O.B., Fizika belka: kurs lektsii (Physics of Protein: Lectures). Moscow: Knizhn. Dom “Universitet”, 2002.
Khodorov, B.I., Obshaya fiziologiya vozbudimikh membran (General Physiology of Excitable Membranes). Moscow: Nauka, 1975.
Harris, H.W., Jr. and Handler, I.S., The Role of Membrane Turnover in the Water Permeability Response to Antidiuretic Hormone, J. Membr. Biol., 1988, vol. 103, pp. 207–216.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © I.N. Ktitorova, O.V. Skobeleva, 2008, published in Fiziologiya Rastenii, 2008, Vol. 55, No. 5, pp. 690–698.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ktitorova, I.N., Skobeleva, O.V. Decrease in membrane hydraulic conductance of rhizodermal cells under nitrate deficit is related to acidification at the root surface. Russ J Plant Physiol 55, 621–628 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443708050051
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443708050051