Skip to main content

Response to Grand Challenges: The Dimension of Social Sciences and the Humanities

Abstract

This article discusses the choice of priority areas, including in the social sciences and humanities, based on the needs of society and the so-called grand challenges, rather than in the traditional logic of development of basic science, which can evolve at its own pace, not always in accordance with the actual needs or effective demand. This approach fits into the new conceptual logic presented in the Strategy for the Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation. Sociological surveys of two types—general public poll and expert assessment—are used to facilitate the choice of priorities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Dynkin.

Additional information

RAS Academician Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Dynkin is President of the RAS Institute of the Global Economy and International Relations.

Russian Text © The Author(s), 2019, published in Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk, 2019, Vol. 89, No. 4, pp. 384–389.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dynkin, A.A. Response to Grand Challenges: The Dimension of Social Sciences and the Humanities. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. 89, 120–124 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331619020047

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331619020047

Keywords

  • priorities
  • needs
  • grand challenges
  • social sciences and humanities
  • Strategy for the Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation