Skip to main content

An intercultural program of migrant integration

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 May 2018

This article has been updated


Mass foreign-culture immigration sharply increases the heterogeneity of the population of developed regions of the world, generating both serious risks and new possibilities for their development. To withstand challenges and use the advantages of diversity, host states look for more adequate models of managing plural societies. An alternative to the existing approaches to integrating immigrants and their descendants is interculturalism, which implies establishing positive intercultural interaction between people, which would be based on the commonalities of their needs and interests. This concept is embodied in intercultural practices of several cities; there have been positive results. However, such practices have not been adapted for use at a higher territorial level thus far.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Change history

  • 17 July 2018

    The title of the article should read:

  • 03 August 2018

    The title of the article should read:


  1. Indicators of Immigrant Integration 2015: Settling In (OECD, Paris, 2015).


  3. Intercultural Policies in European Cities (European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin, 2010).

  4. I. P. Tsapenko, “Economic resources of ethnocultural diversity,” Mir. Ekon. Mezhdunar. Otn. 60 (11), 35–46 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cultural Complexity of Contemporary Nations, Ed. by V. A. Tishkov and E. I. Filippova (Politicheskaya Entsiklopediya, Moscow, 2016) [in Russian].

  6. S. Vertovec, “Super-diversity and its implications,” Ethnic Racial Stud., No. 30 (6), 1024–1054 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Putnam, “E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century,” Scan. Polit. Stud., No. 30 (2), 137–174 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. I. P. Tsapenko and G. A. Monusova, “Integration potential of ethnocultural diversity in European societies,” Polis. Polit. Issled. (2017, in press).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Special Eurobarometer, No. 418 (2014).

  10. N. Demireva, “Immigration, diversity and social cohesion,” Migration Observatory Briefing (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Zachary, The Diversity Advantage: Multicultural Identity in the New World Economy (Westview Press, Boulder, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  12. International Migration Outlook: SOPEMI 2011 (OECD, Paris, 2011).

  13. I. Guidikova, “Cultural diversity and cities: The intercultural integration approach,” RSCAS Policy Paper, No. 02 (2014).

  14. Recommendation CM/Rec (2015) 1 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on intercultural integration. aspx?ObjectId=09000016805c471f.

  15. P. Wood and C. Landry, The Intercultural City: Planning for Diversity Advantage (Routledge, London, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. V. Tlostanova, From the Philosophy of Multiculturalism to the Philosophy of Transculturation: Textbook (RUDN, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. K. Bodirsky, The intercultural alternative to multiculturalism and its limits.

  18. S. Fedyunin, “The world after multiculturalism: Scientific breakthroughs and political deadlocks,” Vestn. Inst. Kennana Ross., No. 23, 66–76 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. N. Epshtein, “Transculture and transcendence,” in Only the Unique Is Global: Personality and Management. Culture and Education (SPbGUKI, St. Petersburg, 2007), pp. 90–102 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  20. V. Benet-Martinez, Multiculturalism: Cultural, Social, and Personality Processes, Ed. by K. Deaux and M. Snyder (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2012).

  21. T. Cantle, Interculturalism: The New Era of Cohesion and Diversity (Palgrave, London, 2012).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. E. A. Pain, “The difficult path from multiculturalism to interculturalism,” Vestn. Inst. Kennana Ross., No. 20, 78–80 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Intercultural Cities: Towards a Model for Intercultural Integration, Ed. by P. Wood (Council of Europe, 2009).

  24. N. Meer and T. Modood, “How does interculturalism contrast with multiculturalism?,” J. Intercultural Stud. 33 (2), 175–196 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Interculturalism: Europe and Its Muslims In Search of Sound Societal Models, Ed. by M. Emerson (Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels, 2011).

  26. R. Zapata-Barrero, “The three strands of intercultural policies: A comprehensive view,” GRITIM-UPF Working Paper Series, No. 17 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. I. Neklessa, “Windows to the future: Culture of complexity and self-organization,” Polis. Polit. Issled., No. 1, 85–110 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 



  30. E. A. Varshaver, A. L. Rocheva, and N. S. Ivanova, “Integration of migrants at the local level: Results of a scientific–practical project,” Sotsiol. Issled., No. 5, 110–117 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Intercultural cities programme: Medium-term strategy.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. P. Tsapenko.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © I.P. Tsapenko, 2017, published in Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk, 2017, Vol. 87, No. 10, pp. 915–926.

Irina Pavlovna Tsapenko, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), is a Sector Head at the Primakov National Research Institute of the Global Economy and International Relations, RAS (RAS IMEMO).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsapenko, I.P. An intercultural program of migrant integration. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. 87, 454–463 (2017).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • foreign-culture immigration
  • ethnic minorities
  • ethnocultural diversity
  • identity
  • conflict
  • resources of development
  • integration policies
  • intercultural cities
  • cohesion