The notion of the collective cognitive unconscious (CCU) is introduced. The hypothesis is formulated that data from the external world are processed proceeding from intuitively adopted assumptions, which substantiate for a subject of cognition the sense and justifiability of any statement or semantic construction. These intuitions are of mass character and are transmitted within a culture. The CCU is probably supported by neuronal mechanisms. It is potentially a universal faculty of man as a generic creature, although it is always realized in one of its possible variants. CCU explications in Western and Arabic–Muslim cultures are demonstrated as spatial visualization and a metaphor of flux. Three major functions of the CCU are considered: specifying the intuitive background for the substantiation of formal logic, the logic of language, and the logic of culture. Since the CCU is potentially universal for humans but is actually always accomplished as a variant and cannot be realized as an invariant, this determines the justifiability of the strategy of panhuman and not common-to-humankind understanding of culture and civilization. The question is posed about the necessity to return the category of panhuman into the field of theoretical discourse.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
A. S. Kuzichev, Venn Diagrams: History and Applications (Nauka, Moscow, 1968) [in Russian].
Fakhr al-Din Al-Razi, Al-Tafsir al-Kabir (Bayrut, 2000), Vol. 1.
A. Smirnov, “‘To be’ and Arabic grammar: The case of kana and wujida,” in Ishraq: Yearbook of Islamic Philosophy (Vostochnaya Literatura, Moscow, 2016), No. 7, pp. 174–201.
A. V. Smirnov, “Proposition and predication,” Filos. Zh. 9 (1), 5–24 (2016).
S. M. N. Al-Attas, Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam: An Exposition of the Fundamental Elements of the Worldview of Islam (International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization, Kuala Lumpur, 1995).
Al-Mawardi, Al-Ahkam al-Sultaniyya wa-l-Wilayat al-Diniyya (Dar al-kitab al-‘arabi, Bayrut, 1990).
Abu Ya’la al-Farra’ (Ibn al-Farra’), Al-Ahkam al-Sultaniyya (Dar al-kutub al-‘ilmiyya, Bayrut, 1983).
A. Abdarrazik, “Islam and the foundations of political power,” Ist. Filos., No. 2, 148–165 (2015).
F. Djad‘an, “Nazariyyat al-dawla fi al-fikr al-’arabi alislami al-mu’asir,” in Nazariyyat al-Turath wa Abhath ‘Arabiyya wa Islamiyya ‘Ukhra (Dar al-shuruq, Amman, 1985), pp. 63–101.
N. Ya. Danilevskii, Russia and Europe (Kniga, Moscow, 1991) [in Russian].
F. M. Dostoyevsky, “Pushkin speech,” in Complete Collection of Works (Nauka, Leningrad, 1984), Vol. 26, pp. 129–149 [in Russian].
Eurasianism: Declaration, Formulation, Theses (Izd. Evraziitsev, Prague, 1932) [in Russian].
P. V. Logovikov, “Scientific problems of Eurasianism,” in Nineteen Thirties: The Statement of Eurasians (Izd. Evraziitsev, Paris, 1931), Vol. 7, pp. 53–63 [in Russian].
Original Russian Text © A.V. Smirnov, 2017, published in Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk, 2017, Vol. 87, No. 10, pp. 867–878.
RAS Academician Andrei Vadimovich Smirnov is Director of the RAS Institute of Philosophy.
About this article
Cite this article
Smirnov, A.V. The collective cognitive unconscious and its role in logic, language, and culture. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. 87, 409–415 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331617050070
- collective cognitive unconscious (CCU)
- Arab–Muslim culture