Alternative metrics (altmetrics) as a possible substitute for or addition to the traditional methods of assessing scientific results based on opinions and bibliometric indicators were first proposed in 2010. Since then, metric indicators, primarily those based on accounting for the use and discussion of scientific publications on the Internet, have, on the one hand, found influential advocates among scientists and publishers and, on the other, been met with resistance on the part of equally authoritative participants in the market of scientific publications. Altmetrics are already used actively by the largest publishers; in June 2014, the American National Information Standards Organization developed a draft altmetrics standard. This article presents a review of the existing indicators, describes their target audience, and considers leading companies that develop software products on altmetrics calculation for users of different categories. Altmetrics and citation-based indicators are compared.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
C. Tenopir and D. W. King, Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists, Librarians, and Publishers (Special Libraries Association, Washington, 2000).
M. Thelwall, S. Haustein, V. Lariviere, and C. R. Sugimoto, “Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services,” Plos One 8(5) (2013).
J. Priem, P. Groth, and D. Taraborelli, “The altmetrics collection,” Plos One 7(11) (2012).
V. N. Gureyev and N. A. Mazov, “Detection of information requirements of researchers using bibliometric analyses to identify target journals,” Information Technology Libraries 32(4) (2013).
C. L. Liu, Y. Q. Xu, H. Wu, S. S. Chen, and J. J. Guo, “Correlation and interaction visualization of altmetric indicators extracted from scholarly social network activities: Dimensions and structure,” J. Med. Internet Res. 15(11) (2013).
“Alternative metrics,” Nature Materials 11(11) (2012).
H. Donato, “Traditional and alternative metrics: The full story of impact,” Revista Portuguesa Pneumologia 20(1) (2014).
P. Sud and M. Thelwall, “Evaluating altmetrics,” Scientometrics 98(2) (2014).
D. Shotton, “CiTO, the citation typing ontology,” J. Biomed. Semantics 1(Suppl. 1), 6 (2010).
J. Kelly, Altmetric rankings (2013). http://infiniflux.blogspot.ca/2013/08/altmetric-rankings.html. Cited July 15, 2014.
T. Brody, S. Harnad, and L. Carr, “Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact,” J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 57(8) (2006).
E. Adie and W. Roe, “Altmetric: Enriching scholarly content with article-level discussion and metrics,” Learned Publishing 26(1) (2013).
P. Jump, Research Intelligence-Alt-metrics: fairer, faster impact data? http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/420926.article. Cited July 15, 2014.
C. Neylon and S. Wu, “Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact,” Plos Biology 7(11) (2009).
P. O. Seglen, “Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research,” British Med. J. 314(7079) (1997).
N. A. Mazov and V. N. Gureev, “The role of unique identifiers in bibliographic information systems,” Sci. Tech. Inf. Processing 41(3) (2014).
F. Galligan and S. Dyas-Correia, “Altmetrics: Rethinking the way we measure,” Serials Rev. 39(1) (2013).
Original Russian Text © N.A. Mazov, V.N. Gureev, 2015, published in Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk, 2015, Vol. 85, No. 2, pp. 115–122.
About this article
Cite this article
Mazov, N.A., Gureev, V.N. Alternative approaches to assessing scientific results. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. 85, 26–32 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331615010116
- Impact Factor
- Scientific Result
- Publica Tions
- Alternative Metrics
- Develop Software Product