Strategic nuclear and nonnuclear deterrence: Modern priorities

Abstract

The enforcement of Russia’s national security from a military perspective requires the continuous improvement of forces and means of deterrence of potential aggression against our country in a wide range of possible threats. Strategic nonnuclear deterrence with the use of high-precision long-range weapons, which is considered as complementary to, rather than substituting for, strategic nuclear weapons, plays an increasingly important role. The effective strategic nonnuclear deterrence depends, to even a larger extent than nuclear deterrence, on the capacity of relevant information and communication infrastructure. It is argued that one should pay special attention to such infrastructure, which should be developed proactively with regard to striking weapons.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    V. V. Putin, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, Nov. 18 (2013). http://www.putin2012.ru/#article-6. Cited November 18, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    A. G. Arbatov, V. Z. Dvorkin, A. A. Pikaev, and S. K. Oznobishchev, Strategic Stability after the Cold War (IMEMO RAN, Moscow, 2010). www.imemo.ru/ru/publ/2010/10026.pdf. Cited September 30, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    A. A. Kokoshin, Problems of Ensuring Strategic Stability: Theoretical and Applied Issues, 2nd ed. (KRASAND, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation 2010. http://news.kremlin.ru. Cited October 15, 2013.

  5. 5.

    A. L. Zhuravlev, T. A. Nestik, and V. A. Soenin, Psychological aspects of strategic stability and nuclear deterrence. http://www.ipas.ru/engine/documents. Cited September 30, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    G. P. Shultz, W. J. Perry, H. A. Kissinger, and S. Nunn, “World free of nuclear weapons,” Wall Street Journal, Jan. 30 (2007). http://online.wsj.com/news/arti-cles/sb1678751525166636. Cited November 14, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    M. Rifkind, D. Owen, D. Hurd, and G. Robertson, “Start worrying and learn to ditch the bomb,” The Times, June 30 (2008). http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/commtnt/guest-contributors/article4237387.ece. Cited November 25, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    E. Primakov, I. Ivanov, E. Velikhov, and M. Moiseev, “From Nuclear deterrence to general security,” Izvestiya, Oct. 21 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    A. A. Kokoshin, Real Sovereignty in the Contemporary World Political System, 3rd ed. (Evropa, Moscow, 2006) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    V. I. Trubnikov, “‘Nuclear status’ in the foreign and domestic policy of India and Pakistan: A view from Russia,” in Prospects for India and Pakistan to Join Nuclear Arms Limitation, Ed. by A. G. Arbatov, V. Z. Dvorkin, and S. K. Oznobishchev (IMEMO RAN, Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    A. Volodin, “Evolution of India’s foreign policy strategy,” Mir. Ekon. Mezhdunar. Otnosheniya, No. 2, 93 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    A. A. Kokoshin, In Search of the Way out: Military-Political Aspects of International Security (Politizdat, Moscow, 1989) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    A new missile for strategic bombers. http://top-war.ru/17552-novaya-raketa-dlya-strategicheskih-bombardirovschikov.html. Cited October 20, 2012; X-101 / X-102. http://militaryrussia.ru. Cited June 09, 2013.

  14. 14.

    “Long arm” for “Severodvinsk.” http://vpk-news.ru/news/2106. Cited May 10, 2013.

  15. 15.

    V. Chirkov, “The Navy’s development is impossible without a long-term outlook,” Nats. Oborona, Aug. 2 (2013). http://vpk.name/news/94207-viktor-chirkov-razvitie-vmf-nevozmozhno-bez-vzglyada-v-dalnyuyu-perspektivu.html. Cited October 31, 2013; “Marine air complex is to be created before 2020,” Novosti VPK, Dec. 21 (2012). http://vpk.name/news/81193-morskoi-avianesushi-complex. Cited October 31, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    A. A. Kokoshin, Army and Politics: Evolution of Soviet Military-Political and Military-Strategic Thought: 1918–1991 (Mezhdunar. Otnosheniya, Moscow, 1995) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    A. A. Kokoshin, On revolution in military science in the past and in the future. http://magazines.russ.ru/oz/2005/5/205-5-4-pr.html

  18. 18.

    F. O. Trunov, “USSR policy-making factors during the Caribbean Crisis,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 25: Mezhdunar. Otnosheniya Mir. Politika, No. 1 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    B. Clad, “Dilemmas of deterrence: Rational and nonrational perspectives,” in Psychological Dimensions of War, Ed. by B. Clad (SAGE Publications, London, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Explosive Generators of Powerful Electric Current Impulses, Ed. by V. E. Fortov (Nauka, Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    A. Frolov, “A new bomber for long-range aviation,” Armeiskii Vestn., No. 8 (2012). http://army-news.ru/2012/08/. Cited July 8, 2013; A bomber of the future. http://gunm.ru. Cited July 10, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    V. A. Veselov, “The nuclear factor in world politics: Structure and content,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 25: Mezhdunar. Otnosheniya Mir. Politika, No. 1 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    E. Myasnikov, Strategic nuclear arms in nonnuclear outfit and its effect on the role of nuclear arms. http://www.armscontrol.ru/pubs. Cited August 29, 2013.

  24. 24.

    A. Khramchikhin, “Attack on Russia: A myth or a reality?,” Nats. Oborona. http://www.oborona.ru. Cited October 29, 2012.

  25. 25.

    N. Maglinov, “To predict a prompt global strike: Innovations for aerospace defense,” VPK-News, No. 39 (2012). http://vpk-news.ru/articles/12645. Cited October 31, 2012; Advanced hypersonic weapon (AHW), United States of America. http://www.army-technol-ogy.com/projects/advanced-hypersonic-weaponahw/. Cited August 08, 2013; US develops hypersonic means of a prompt global strike: Military parity. http://www.militaryparitet.com/perevodnie/data/ic-perevodnie/2733/. Cited October 07, 2012; “U.S. faces choice on new weapons for fast strikes,” The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/23/world/europe/23strikes.html/. Cited September 08, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    A. A. Kokoshin, Nuclear Conflicts in the 21st Century (Media-Press, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    A. A. Kokoshin, A. G. Savel’ev, and V. Ya. Potapov, “On the possible structure and content of the new version of the Military Doctrine,” in Toward the New Version of the Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation, Ed. by A. G. Savel’ev, 2nd ed. (Editorial URSS, Moscow, 2009) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    A. A. Kokoshin, Innovative Armed Forces and the Revolution in Military Science (LENAND, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Aerospace defense forces. http://structure.mil.ru/structure/forces/cosmic.htm. Cited October 12, 2013.

  30. 30.

    A. S. Kapto, “Cyberwarfare: Genesis and doctrinal outlines,” Herald Russ. Acad. Sci. 83(4), 357 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrei Afanas’evich Kokoshin.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.A. Kokoshin, 2014, published in Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk, 2014, Vol. 84, No. 3, pp. 195–205.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kokoshin, A.A. Strategic nuclear and nonnuclear deterrence: Modern priorities. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. 84, 59–68 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S101933161402004X

Download citation

Keywords

  • Nuclear Weapon
  • Ballistic Missile
  • Cruise Missile
  • Nuclear Disarmament
  • Nuclear Deterrence