Skip to main content

Features of Numerical Reconstruction of a Boundary Condition in an Inverse Problem for a Reaction–Diffusion–Advection Equation with Data on the Position of a Reaction Front

Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics volume 62, pages 441–451 (2022)Cite this article

Abstract

A new approach to the reconstruction of a boundary condition in an inverse problem for a nonlinear singularly perturbed reaction–diffusion–advection equation with data on the reaction front position is proposed. The problem is solved via gradient minimization of a cost functional with an initial approximation chosen by applying asymptotic analysis methods. The efficiency of the proposed approach is demonstrated by numerical experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

REFERENCES

  1. V. G. Danilov, V. P. Maslov, and K. A. Volosov, Mathematical Modeling of Heat and Mass Transfer Processes (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1995).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. V. F. Butuzov and A. B. Vasil’eva, “Singularly perturbed problems with boundary and interior layers: Theory and applications,” Adv. Chem. Phys. 97, 47–179 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Z. Liu, Q. Liu, H.-C. Lin, C. S. Schwartz, Y.-H. Lee, and T. Wang, “Three-dimensional variational assimilation of MODIS aerosol optical depth: Implementation and application to a dust storm over East Asia,” J. Geophys. Res.: Atm. 116 (D23), 23206 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Egger, K. Fellner, J.-F. Pietschmann, and B. Q. Tang, “Analysis and numerical solution of coupled volume-surface reaction–diffusion systems with application to cell biology,” Appl. Math. Comput. 336, 351–367 (2018).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. N. M. Yaparova, “Method for determining particle growth dynamics in a two-component alloy,” Steel Transl. 50 (2), 95–99 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. X. Wu and M. Ni, “Existence and stability of periodic contrast structure in reaction–advection–diffusion equation with discontinuous reactive and convective terms,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 91, 105457 (2020).

  7. G. Lin, Y. Zhang, X. Cheng, M. Gulliksson, P. Forssen, and T. Fornstedt, “A regularizing Kohn–Vogelius formulation for the model-free adsorption isotherm estimation problem in chromatography,” Appl. Anal. 97 (1), 13–40 (2018).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Zhang, G. Lin, M. Gulliksson, P. Forssen, T. Fornstedt, and X. Cheng, “An adjoint method in inverse problems of chromatography,” Inverse Probl. Sci. Eng. 25 (8), 1112–1137 (2017).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. A. I. Volpert, V. A. Volpert, and Vl. A. Volpert, Traveling Wave Solutions of Parabolic Systems (Am. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I., 2000).

  10. H. Meinhardt, Models of Biological Pattern Formation (Academic, London, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. FitzHugh, “Impulses and physiological states in theoretical model of nerve membrane,” Biophys. J. l (1), 445–466 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. D. Murray, Mathematical Biology, Vol 1: An Introduction (Springer, New York, 2002).

  13. H. Egger, J.-F. Pietschmann, and M. Schlottbom, “Identification of nonlinear heat conduction laws,” J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 23 (5), 429–437 (2015).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Gholami, A. Mang, and G. Biros, “An inverse problem formulation for parameter estimation of a reaction–diffusion model of low grade gliomas,” J. Math. Biol. 72 (1–2), 409–433 (2016).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. R. R. Aliev and A. V. Panfilov, “A simple two-variable model of cardiac excitation,” Chaos Solitons Fractals 7 (3), 293–301 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. A. Generalov, N. T. Levashova, A. E. Sidorova, P. M. Chumankov, and L. V. Yakovenko, “An autowave model of the bifurcation behavior of transformed cells in response to polysaccharide,” Biophysics 62 (5), 876–881 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Mang, A. Gholami, C. Davatzikos, and G. Biros, “PDE-constrained optimization in medical image analysis,” Optim. Eng. 19 (3), 765–812 (2018).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. S. I. Kabanikhin and M. A. Shishlenin, “Recovering a time-dependent diffusion coefficient from nonlocal data,” Numer. Anal. Appl. 11, 38–44 (2018).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. V. Mamkin, J. Kurbatova, V. Avilov, Yu. Mukhartova, A. Krupenko, D. Ivanov, N. Levashova, and A. Olchev, “Changes in net ecosystem exchange of CO2, latent and sensible heat fluxes in a recently clear-cut spruce forest in Western Russia: Results from an experimental and modeling analysis,” Environ. Res. Lett. 11 (12), 125012 (2016).

  20. N. T. Levashova, J. V. Muhartova, and A. V. Olchev, “Two approaches to describe the turbulent exchange within the atmospheric surface layer,” Math. Models Comput. Simul. 9 (6), 697–707 (2017).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. N. Levashova, A. Sidorova, A. Semina, and M. Ni, “A spatio-temporal autowave model of shanghai territory development,” Sustainability 11 (13), 3658 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. A. Zakharova, M. A. Davydova, and D. V. Lukyanenko, “A spatio-temporal autowave model of shanghai territory development,” Inverse Probl. Sci. Eng. 29 (3), 365–377 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. V. M. Isakov, S. I. Kabanikhin, A. A. Shananin, M. A. Shishlenin, and S. Zhang, “Algorithm for determining the volatility function in the Black–Scholes model,” Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 59 (10), 1753–1758 (2019).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. M. K. Kadalbajoo and V. Gupta, “A brief survey on numerical methods for solving singularly perturbed problems,” Appl. Math. Comput. 217 (18), 3641–3716 (2010).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. J. R. Cannon and P. DuChateau, “An inverse problem for a nonlinear diffusion equation,” SIAM J. Appl. Math. 39 (2), 272–289 (1980).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. P. DuChateau and W. Rundel, “Unicity in an inverse problem for an unknown reaction term in a reaction–diffusion equation,” J. Differ. Equations 59, 155–165 (1985).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. M. S. Pilant and W. Rundell, “An inverse problem for a nonlinear parabolic equation,” Commun. Partial Differ. Equations 11 (4), 445–457 (1986).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. S. I. Kabanikhin, “Definitions and examples of inverse and ill-posed problems,” J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 16 (4), 317–357 (2008).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. S. I. Kabanikhin, Inverse and Ill-Posed Problems Theory and Applications (De Gruyter, Berlin, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  30. B. Jin and W. Rundell, “A tutorial on inverse problems for anomalous diffusion processes,” Inverse Probl. 31, 035003 (2015).

  31. A. Belonosov and M. Shishlenin, “Regularization methods of the continuation problem for the parabolic equation,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 10187, 220–226 (2017).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. B. Kaltenbacher and W. Rundell, “On the identification of a nonlinear term in a reaction–diffusion equation,” Inverse Probl. 35, 115007 (2019).

  33. A. Belonosov, M. Shishlenin, and D. Klyuchinskiy, “A comparative analysis of numerical methods of solving the continuation problem for 1D parabolic equation with the data given on the part of the boundary,” Adv. Comput. Math. 45 (2), 735–755 (2019).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. B. Kaltenbacher and W. Rundell, “The inverse problem of reconstructing reaction–diffusion systems,” Inverse Probl. 36 (065011) (2020).

  35. D. V. Lukyanenko, M. A. Shishlenin, and V. T. Volkov, “Solving of the coefficient inverse problems for a nonlinear singularly perturbed reaction–diffusion–advection equation with the final time data,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 54, 233–247 (2018).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. D. V. Lukyanenko, I. V. Prigorniy, and M. A. Shishlenin, “Some features of solving an inverse backward problem for a generalized Burgers’ equation,” J. Inverse Ill-posed Probl. 28 (5), 641–649 (2020).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. D. V. Lukyanenko, A. A. Borzunov, and M. A. Shishlenin, “Solving coefficient inverse problems for nonlinear singularly perturbed equations of the reaction–diffusion–advection type with data on the position of a reaction front,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 99, 105824 (2021).

  38. D. Lukyanenko, T. Yeleskina, I. Prigorniy, T. Isaev, A. Borzunov, and M. Shishlenin, “Inverse problem of recovering the initial condition for a nonlinear equation of the reaction–diffusion–advection type by data given on the position of a reaction front with a time delay,” Mathematics 9 (4), 342 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  39. D. V. Lukyanenko, V. B. Grigorev, V. T. Volkov, and M. A. Shishlenin, “Solving of the coefficient inverse problem for a nonlinear singularly perturbed two-dimensional reaction–diffusion equation with the location of moving front data,” Comput. Math. Appl. 77 (5), 1245–1254 (2019).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. D. V. Lukyanenko, M. A. Shishlenin, and V. T. Volkov, “Asymptotic analysis of solving an inverse boundary value problem for a nonlinear singularly perturbed time-periodic reaction–diffusion–advection equation,” J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 27 (5), 745–758 (2019).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. A. B. Vasil’eva, V. F. Butuzov, and N. N. Nefedov, “Singularly perturbed problems with boundary and internal layers,” Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 268, 258–273 (2010).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. A. N. Tikhonov, A. V. Goncharsky, V. V. Stepanov, and A. G. Yagola, Numerical Methods for the Solution of Ill-Posed Problems (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1995).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. O. M. Alifanov, E. A. Artuhin, and S. V. Rumyantsev, Extreme Methods for the Solution of Ill-Posed Problems (Nauka, Moscow, 1988) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  44. S. I. Kabanikhin and M. A. Shishlenin, “Quasi-solution in inverse coefficient problems,” J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 16 (7), 705–713 (2008).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. E. Hairer and G. Wanner, Solving Ordinary Differential Equations, Vol. 2: Stiff and Differential-Algebraic Problems (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996).

  46. H. H. Rosenbrock, “Some general implicit processes for the numerical solution of differential equations,” Computer J. 5 (4), 329–330 (1963).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. A. Alshin, E. Alshina, N. Kalitkin, and A. Koryagina, “Rosenbrock schemes with complex coefficients for stiff and differential algebraic systems,” Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 46, 1320–1340 (2006).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. X. Wen, “High order numerical methods to a type of delta function integrals,” J. Comput. Phys. 226 (2), 1952–1967 (2007).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. H. Egger, H. W. Engl, and M. V. Klibanov, “Global uniqueness and holder stability for recovering a nonlinear source term in a parabolic equation,” Inverse Probl. 21 (1), 271–290 (2005).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. L. Belina and M. V. Klibanov, “A globally convergent numerical method for a coefficient inverse problem,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 31 (1), 478–509 (2008).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. M. V. Klibanov, M. A. Fiddy, L. Beilina, N. Pantong, J. Schenk, “Picosecond scale experimental verification of a globally convergent algorithm for a coefficient inverse problem,” Inverse Probl. 26 (4), 045003 (2010).

  52. D. Chaikovskii and Y. Zhang, “Convergence analysis for forward and inverse problems in singularly perturbed time-dependent reaction-advection-diffusion equations,” (2021). arXiv:2106.15249 [math.NA].

  53. A. G. Yagola, A. S. Leonov, and V. N. Titatenko, “Data errors and an error estimation for ill-posed problems,” Inverse Probl. Eng. 10 (2), 117–129 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  54. K. Y. Dorofeev, V. N. Titatenko, and A. G. Yagola, “Algorithms for constructing a posteriori errors of solutions to ill-posed problems,” Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 43 (1), 10–23 (2003).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  55. A. S. Leonov, “A posteriori accuracy estimations of solutions to ill-posed inverse problems and extra-optimal regularizing algorithms for their solution,” Numer. Anal. Appl. 5 (1), 68–83 (2012).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 20-31-70016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119992, Moscow, Russia

    R. L. Argun, A. V. Gorbachev & D. V. Lukyanenko

  2. Moscow Center for Fundamental and Applied Mathematics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119234, Moscow, Russia

    D. V. Lukyanenko

  3. Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia

    M. A. Shishlenin

  4. Novosibirsk State University, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia

    M. A. Shishlenin

Authors
  1. R. L. Argun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. V. Gorbachev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. V. Lukyanenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. A. Shishlenin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. V. Lukyanenko.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by I. Ruzanova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Argun, R.L., Gorbachev, A.V., Lukyanenko, D.V. et al. Features of Numerical Reconstruction of a Boundary Condition in an Inverse Problem for a Reaction–Diffusion–Advection Equation with Data on the Position of a Reaction Front. Comput. Math. and Math. Phys. 62, 441–451 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965542522030022

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965542522030022

Keywords:

  • inverse problem with data on the position of a reaction front
  • inverse boundary value problem
  • reaction–diffusion–advection equation