Abstract
A novel method for deriving a posteriori error bounds for approximate solutions of reaction–diffusion equations is proposed. As a model problem, the problem \( - \Delta u + \sigma u = f\) in \(\Omega \), \({{\left. u \right|}_{{\partial \Omega }}} = 0\) with an arbitrary constant reaction coefficient \(\sigma \geqslant 0\) is studied. For the solutions obtained by the finite element method, bounds, which are called consistent for brevity, are proved. The order of accuracy of these bounds is the same as the order of accuracy of unimprovable a priori bounds. The consistency also assumes that the order of accuracy of such bounds is ensured by test fluxes that satisfy only the corresponding approximation requirements but are not required to satisfy the balance equations. The range of practical applicability of consistent a posteriori error bounds is very wide because the test fluxes appearing in these bounds can be calculated using numerous flux recovery procedures that were intensively developed for error indicators of the residual method. Such recovery procedures often ensure not only the standard approximation orders but also the superconvergency of the recovered fluxes. The advantages of the proposed family of a posteriori bounds are their guaranteed sharpness, no need for satisfying the balance equations in flux recovery procedures, and a much wider range of efficient applicability compared with other a posteriori bounds.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
O. C. Zienkiewicz and J. Z. Zhu, “The superconvergence patch recovery (SPR) and adaptive finite element refinement,” Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 101, 207–224 (1992).
M. Ainsworth and J. T. Oden, A Posteriori Estimation in Finite Element Analysis (Wiley, New York, 2000).
I. Babuska and T. Strouboulis, Finite Element Method and Its Reliability (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2001).
I. Babuska, J. R. Witeman, and T. Strouboulis, Finite Elements: An Introduction to the Method and Error Estimation (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2011).
A. Ern, A. Stephansen, and M. Vohralik, “Guaranteed and robust discontinuous Galerkin a posteriori error estimates for convection-diffusion-reaction problems,” J. Comput. Appl. Math. 234, 114–130 (2009).
I. Cheddadi, R. Fučík, M. I. Prieto, and M. Vohralik, “Guaranteed and robust a posteriori error estimates for singularly perturbed reaction–diffusion problems, ESAIM: Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 43, 867–888 (2009).
Z. Cai and S. Zhang, “Flux recovery and a posteriori error estimators: conforming elements for scalar elliptic equations,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 48, 578–602 (2010).
M. Ainsworth and T. Vejchodský, “Robust error bounds for finite element approximation of reaction-diffusion problems with non-constant reaction coefficient in arbitrary space dimension,” arXiv:1401.2394v2 math.NA., 2015.
M. Ainsworth and T. Vejchodský, “Fully computable robust a posteriori error bounds for singularly perturbed reaction-diffusion problems,” Numer. Math. 119, 219–243 (2011).
V. G. Korneev, “Robust consistent a posteriori error majorants for approximate solutions of reaction–diffusion equations,” Proc. of the 11th Int. Conf. on Mesh Methods for Boundary Value Problems and Applications (Kazan Univ., Kazan, 2016), pp. 182–187.
V. G. Korneev, “Robust consistent a posteriori error majorants for approximate solutions of diffusion–reaction equations,” arXiv:1702.00433v1 math.NA., 2017.
V. G. Korneev, “On the accuracy of a posteriori functional error majorants for approximate solutions of elliptic equations,” Dokl. Math. 96, 380–383 (2017).
J.-P. Aubin, Approximation of Elliptic Boundary-Value Problems (Wiley Interscience, New York, 1972).
L. Scott and S. Zhang, “Finite element interpolation of nonsmooth functions satisfying boundary conditions,” Math. Comput. 54, 483–493 (1990).
J. A. Cottrell, J. R. Hughes, and Yu. Bazilevs, Isogeometric Analysis. Toward Integration of CAD and FEA (Wiley, New York, 2009).
A. Ern and J.-L. Guermond, Theory and Practice of Finite Elements (Springer, Berlin, 2004).
O. A. Ladyzhenskaya, The Boundary Value Problems of Mathematical Physics (Springer, New York, 1985).
V. G. Korneev and U. Langer, Dirichlet-Dirichlet Domain Decomposition Methods for Elliptic Problems, h and hp Finite Element Discretizations (World Scientific, New Jesey, 2015).
S. I. Repin and M. E. Frolov, “A posteriori error estimates for approximate solutions to elliptic boundary value problems,” Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 42, 1704–1716 (2002).
S. G. Mikhlin, Variational Methods in Mathematical Physics (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1964).
I. E. Anufriev, V. G. Korneev, and V. S. Kostylev, “Exactly equilibrated fields, can they be efficiently used for a posteriori error estimation?” Uchen. Zap. Kazan Univ., Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Nauki 148 (4), 94–143 (2006).
V. G. Korneev, “Simple algorithms for finding a posteriori errors of numerical solutions to elliptic equations,” Uchen. Zap. Kazan Univ., Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Nauki 154 (4), 11–27 (2011).
S. Repin and S. Sauter, “Functional a posteriori estimates for the reaction-diffusion problem,” Compte Rendu Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 343, 349–354 (2006).
M. A. Churilova, “Computational properties of a posteriori functional estimates for the stationary reaction–diffusion problem,” Vestn. S.-Peterb. Univ., Ser. 1: Mat., Mekh., Astron. 1 (1), 68–78 (2014).
L. A. Oganesyan and L. A. Rukhovets, Variational-Difference Methods for Solving Elliptic Equations (Akad. Nauk Arm. SSR, Erevan, 1979) [in Russian].
A. I. Nazarov and S. V. Poborchii, Poincaré Inequality and Its Applications (St. Petersburg Gos. Univ., St. Peterburg, 2012) [in Russian].
O. A. Ladyzhenskaya and N. N. Ural’tseva, Linear and Quasilinear Elliptic Equations (Academic, New York, 1968).
J. Xu and J. Zou, “Some nonoverlapping domain decomposition methods,” SIAM Review. 40, 857–914 (1998).
J. H. Bramble and J. Xu, “Some estimates for a weighted \({{L}_{2}}\) projection,” Math. Comput. 56, 463–476 (1991).
Ph. Ciarlet, The Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977).
V. G. Korneev, High-Order Schemes of the Finite Element Method (Leningr. Gos. Univ, Leningrad, 1977) [in Russian].
E. Creusé and S. Nicaise, “A posteriori error estimator based on gradient recovery by averaging for discontinuous Galerkin methods,” J. Comput. Appl. Math. 234, 2903–2915 (2010).
V. Carey and G. G. Carey, “Flexible patch post-processing recovery strategies for solution enhancement and adaptive mesh refinement,” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 87 (1–5), 424–436 (2011).
C. E. Carstensen and C. Merdon, “Effective postprocessing for equilibration a posteriori error estimators,” Numer. Math. 123, 425–459 (2013).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am grateful to the reviewer for useful advice that helped improve the presentation and eliminate errors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by A. Klimontovich
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Korneev, V.G. On Error Control in the Numerical Solution of Reaction–Diffusion Equation. Comput. Math. and Math. Phys. 59, 1–18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965542519010123
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965542519010123