Abstract
A direct method for aerodynamic shape optimization based on the use of Bézier spline approximation is proposed. The method is tested as applied to the optimization of the supersonic part of an axisymmetric de Laval nozzle. The optimization results are compared with the exact solution obtained by the control contour method (variational nozzle) and with nozzles constructed using another direct method, namely, local linearization. It is shown that both direct optimization methods can be used on rather coarse grids without degrading the accuracy of the solution. The optimization procedure involves the isoperimetric condition that the surface area of the nozzle is given and fixed, which prevents the use of the control contour method. Optimization with allowance for viscosity is performed using the method. For fairly short maximum possible nozzle lengths in the range of Reynolds numbers under consideration, it is shown that allowance for viscosity does not improve the nozzle shape produced by optimization based on the Euler equations. The role of viscosity is reduced to the determination of an optimal length.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
K. G. Guderley and J. V. Armitage, “A General Method for the Determination of Best Supersonic Rocket Nozzles,” in Theory of Optimal Aerodynamic Shapes (Mir, Moscow, 1969), pp. 172–194 [in Russian].
A. L. Gonor and A. N. Kraiko, “Some Results Concerning Optimal Shapes at Super- and Hypersonic Velocities,” in Theory of Optimal Aerodynamic Shapes (Mir, Moscow, 1969), pp. 455–492 [in Russian].
A. N. Kraiko, Variational Problems in Gas Dynamics (Nauka, Moscow, 1979) [in Russian].
Yu. D. Shmyglevskii, Analytical Studies of Fluid Dynamics (Editorial URSS, Moscow, 1999) [in Russian].
S. A. Takovitskii, “Analytical Solution in the Problem of Constructing Axisymmetric Noses with Minimum Wave Drag,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Mekh. Zhidk. Gaza, No. 2, 155–162 (2006).
N. I. Tillyaeva, “Profiling the Supersonic Sections of Axisymmetric Nozzles for Nonuniform and Swirling Flows,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR. Mekh. Zhidk. Gaza, No. 3, 124–131 (1975).
V. G. Butov, “Investigation of Variational Problems by Direct Methods,” Zh. Vychisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz. 48, 373–386 (2008) [Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 48, 354–366 (2008)].
V. G. Butov, I. M. Vasenin, and A. I. Shelukha, “Application of Nonlinear Programming Methods to Variational Problems in Gas Dynamics,” Prikl. Mat. Mekh. 41(1), 59–64 (1977).
V. M. Borisov and I. E. Mikhailov, “On the Optimization of Three-Dimensional Supersonic Nozzles,” Zh. Vychisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz. 21, 517–519 (1981).
A. V. Rodionov, “Improvement of the Order of Accuracy of Godunov’s Scheme,” Zh. Vychisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz. 27, 1853–1860 (1987).
J. D. Hoffman, M. P. Scofield, and H. D. Thompson, “Thrust Nozzle Optimization Including Boundary-Layer Effects,” J. Optimizat. Theory Appl. 10(3), 133–159 (1972).
A. N. Gulyaev, V. E. Kozlov, and A. N. Sekundov, “Creation of a Universal Single-Parameter Model for Turbulent Viscosity,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Mekh. Zhidk. Gaza, No. 4, 69–81 (1993).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © A.A. Kraiko, K.S. P’yankov, 2010, published in Zhurnal Vychislitel’noi Matematiki i Matematicheskoi Fiziki, 2010, Vol. 50, No. 9, pp. 1624–1631.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kraiko, A.A., P’yankov, K.S. Effective direct methods for aerodynamic shape optimization. Comput. Math. and Math. Phys. 50, 1546–1552 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965542510090071
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965542510090071