Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of thermodynamic parameters on energy characteristics of CO2 power cycles during oxygen combustion of methane

  • Published:
Thermophysics and Aeromechanics Aims and scope

Abstract

Four options for the power cycle using carbon dioxide as a working fluid during oxygen combustion of gaseous fuel are considered. In all the cases, heat is supplied within the zone of supercritical parameters of CO2. The fundamental difference in options lies in the method of increasing the working fluid pressure. The heat is supplied to the cycle in the combustion chamber, and the cycle operation is accompanied by continuous updating of the working fluid, since part of CO2 and all steam obtained during fuel combustion are removed from the cycle. It is shown that cycles with a single-stage pressure increase by a pump have the highest thermal efficiency, reaching 64.5 %. The effect of thermodynamic parameters on the energy characteristics of cycles has been estimated quantitatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. UNFCCC adoption of the Paris agreement, Conf. of the Particles, Report No. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev. 2015.

  2. R. Allam, S. Martin, B. Forrest, J. Fetvedt, X. Lu, D. Freed, and J. Manning, Demonstration of the Allam cycle: An update on the development status of a high efficiency supercritical carbon dioxide power process employing full carbon capture, Energy Procedia, 2017, No. 114, P. 5948–5966.

  3. R.J. Allam, M.R. Falmer, G.W. Brown, J. Fetvedt et al. High efficiency and low cost of electricity generation from fossil fuels while eliminating atmospheric emissions, including carbon dioxide, Energy Procedia, 2013, No. 37, P. 1135–1149.

  4. V.V. Datsenko, Yu.A. Zeigarnik, E.A. Kalashnikova, A.A. Kosoy, A.S. Kosoy, and M.V. Senkevich, Combined cycle plants with complete caturing of carbon dioxide for clean power projects, Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, 2020, Vol. 27, No. 5, P. 775–781.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. A.S. Kosoi, Yu.A. Zeigarnik, O.S. Popel, M.V. Senkevich, S.P. Filippov, and V.Ya. Shteinberg, The conceptual process arrangement of a steam-gas power plant with fully capturing carbon dioxide from combustion products, Thermal Engineering, 2018, No. 9, P. 597–605.

  6. W. Sanz, Graz cycle — a zero emission power plant for CCS (Carbon Capture and Storage), URL: http://www.graz-cycle.tugraz.at/

  7. This power plant runs on CO2/IEEE SPECTRUM, For the technology insider, 2018, URL: https://spectrum.ieee.org/this-power-plant-runs-on-co2

  8. R.J. Allam, J.E. Fetvedt, B.A. Forrest, and D.A. Freed, The oxy-fuel, supercritical CO2 Allam cycle: New cycle developments to produce even lower-cost electricity from fossil fuels without atmospheric emissions, ASME Turbo Expo 2014: Turbine Technical Conf. and Exposition (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2014), ASME Paper No. GT 2014–26952.

  9. H. Jericha, A. Lukasser, and W. Gatterbauer, Der «Graz Cycle» für Industriekraftwerke gefeuert mit Brenngasen aus Kohle- und Schwerölvergasung, VDI Berichte 1566, VDI Conf. Essen, Germany, 2000.

  10. W. Sanz, M. Braun, H. Jericha, and M.F. Platzer, Adapting the zero-emission graz cycle for hydrogen combustion and investigation of its part load behavior, Inter. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2018, No. 43, P. 5737–5746.

  11. F. Heitmeir and H. Jericha, Turbomachinery design for the Graz cycle: an optimized power plant concept for CO2 retention, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: J. Power and Energy, 2015, No. 219, Iss. 2, P. 147–158.

  12. W. Sanz, H. Jericha, M. Moser, and F. Heitmeir, Thermodynamic and economic investigation of an improved Graz cycle power plant for CO2 capture, ASME Turbo Expo 2004, Vienna, Austria (Conference presentation), Paper No. GT2004-53722, Vol. 7, P. 409–418.

  13. W. Sanz, M. Braun, H. Jericha, and M.F. Platzer, Adapting the zero-emission Graz cycle for hydrogen combustion and investigation of its part load behavior, ASME Turbo Expo 2016, Seoul, South Korea (Conf. presentation), ASME Paper No. GT2016-57988, 2016, Vol. 3.

  14. K. Wimmer and W. Sanz, Optimization and comparison of the two promising oxy-combustion cycles NET Power cycle and Graz Cycle, Inter. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 2020, Vol. 99, P. 103055–1–103055–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Sinkevich, A. Kosoy, and O. Popel, Comparative analysis of the Allam cycle and the cycle of compressorless combined cycle gas turbine unit, E3S Web of Conf., 2020, Vol. 209, Iss. 11, P. 03023–1–03023–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Borisov, N. Fominykh, E. Ramazanov, and O. Popel, Analysis of the compressorless combined cycle gas turbine unit performance efficiency in district heating systems, E3S Web of Conf., 2020, Vol. 209, P. 03008–1–03008–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Sinkevich, Yu. Borisov, A. Kosoy, E. Ramazanov, and O. Popel, Comparative analysis of the Allam cycle and the cycle of a compressorless combined cycle plant, Inter. Conf. “ENERGY-21: Sustainable Development & Smart Management”, MESI SB RAS, Irkutsk, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  18. V.V. Volkov-Muzylev, Yu.A. Borisov, and N.K. Fominykh, Designing a model sample of a non-compressor combined cycle plant, International Conference of young scientists “Energy System Research-2021”, MESI SB RAS, Irkutsk, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Budinis, S. Krevor, N.M. Dowell, N. Brandon, and A. Nawkes, An assessment of CCS costs, barriers and potential, Energy Strategy Reviews, 2018, No. 22, P. 61–81.

  20. D.Y.C. Leung, G. Caramanna, and M.M. Maroto-Valer, An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, No. 39, P. 426–443.

  21. F.D. Longa, R. Detz, and B. van der Zwaan, Integrated assessment projections for the impact of innovation on CCS deployment in Europe, Inter. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 2020, No. 103, P. 103133-1–103133-4.

  22. P.A. Shchinnikov, I.S. Sadkin, A.P. Shchinnikov, N.F. Cheganova, and N.I. Vorogushina, Influence of the initial parameters on the thermodynamic efficiency of carbon dioxide power cycles, J. Physics: Conf. Series, 2022, Vol. 2150, P. 012011–1–012011–6.

    Google Scholar 

  23. P. Shchinnikov, O. Borush, A. Frantseva, and I. Sadkin, Efficiency of zero emission cycles on the basis of their configuration, E3S Web of Conf., 2021, Vol. 289, P. 02001–1–02001–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. P.A. Shchinnikov, I.S. Sadkin, and A.P. Shchinnikov, Features of cycles using carbon dioxide as a working fluid, in Proc. Inter. Conf. “Development of Applied Mathematics Methods for Solving Interdisciplinary Energy Problems, 2021, UlSTU, Ulyanovsk, P. 169–171.

    Google Scholar 

  25. V.V. Pomerantsev, K.M. Arefiev, D.B. Akhmedov et al., Fundamentals of the Practical Theory of Combustion: Textbook for Universities, Energia, Leningrad, 1973.

  26. Theoretical Foundations of Heat Engineering. Thermotechnical Experiment: Handbook, V.A. Grigoriev and V.N. Zorin (Eds.), Energoatomizdat, Moscow, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. S. Sadkin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alekseenko, S.V., Shchinnikov, P.A. & Sadkin, I.S. Effect of thermodynamic parameters on energy characteristics of CO2 power cycles during oxygen combustion of methane. Thermophys. Aeromech. 30, 83–92 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869864323010109

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869864323010109

Keywords

Navigation