Advertisement

Thermophysics and Aeromechanics

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 31–46 | Cite as

Numerical simulation of the flow with a pseudo-shock in an axisymmetric expanding duct with a frontal inlet

  • I. I. Mazhul
  • Yu. P. Gounko
Article
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

The results of the numerical modeling of a flow with a pseudo-shock in an axisymmetric duct are presented. The duct included a frontal inlet with the initial funnel-shaped compression part and the cylindrical throat part as well as the subsequent expanding diffuser. To create a flow with a pseudo-shock, the duct was throttled with the use of the outlet converging insert. Numerical computations of the axisymmetric flow have been conducted on the basis of the solution of the Reynolds-averaged Navier−Stokes equations and with the use of the k-ω SST turbulence model. As a result of computations, such parameters of the flow were determined as the location of the beginning of the pseudo-shock, the length of its supersonic part, the velocity profiles in different cross sections of the pseudo-shock, the pressure distribution on the duct wall, the total pressure recovery factor, and others. The behavior of these parameters at the freestream Mach number М = 6 was analyzed versus the diffuser opening angle and different degree of the inlet duct throttling.

Keywords

axisymmetric supersonic flow frontal inlet of internal compression expanding diffuser pseudo-shock duct throttling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    O.V. Gus’kov, V.I. Kopchenov, I.I. Lipatov, V.N. Ostras, and V.P. Starukhin, Processes of Slowing Down Supersonic Flows in Ducts, Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2008.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Matsuo, Y. Miyazato, and H.-D. Kim, Shock train and pseudo-shock phenomena in internal gas flows, Pro-gress in Aerospace Sci., 1999, No. 35, P. 33–100.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V.I. Penzin, Experimental Investigation of Separated Flows in Ducts, TsAGI, Moscow, 2009.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. Huang, Zh.-G. Wang. M. Pourkashanian, L. Ma, D.B. Ingham, Sh.-B. Luo, J. Lei, and J. Liu, Numerical investigation of the shock wave transition in a three-dimensional scramjet isolator, Acta Astronautica, 2011, Vol. 68, Nos. 11-12, P. 1669–1675.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C.P. Wang, X.-A. Tian, K.-M. Cheng, and Y.-Z. Wu, Numerical analysis of pseudo-shock flow diffusion phe-nomenon in variable cross section ducts, J. Aerospace Engng, 2008, Vol. 222, No. 8, P. 1109–1121.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E.A. Meshcheryakov and V.V. Yashina, Quasi-one-dimensional separation type model of pseudo-shock in a duct, TsAGI Science J., 2013, Vol. 44, No. 5, P. 639–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.E. Medvedev, Approximate modeling of the flow structure in a λ-shaped pseudo-shock, J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys., 2014, Vol. 55, No. 6, P. 942–956.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S.C. Tirtey, R.R. Boyce, L.M. Brown, M.A. Creagh, P. van Staden, I. Dimitrijevic, and B. Capra, The SCRAMSPACE I scramjet flight design and construction, AIAA Paper, 2012, No. 5843.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    B.V. Boshenyatov, B.N. Gilyazetdinov, and V.V. Zatoloka, Experimental investigations of hypersonic inlets, in: Aeromekhanika, Nauka, Moscow, 1976, P. 87–98.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A.S. Antonov, B.V. Boshenyatov, B.N. Gilyazetdinov, B.I. Gutov, and V.V. Zatoloka, Tests of hypersonic axisymmetric inlets of internal compression in a hypersonic hot-shot wind tunnel IT-301 at M = 11.5, in: Aerophysical Research, ITAM of the USSR Acad. Sci. Siberian Branch, 1972, P. 108–109.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yu.P. Gounko and I.I. Mazhul, Numerical modeling of the conditions for realization of flow regimes in supersonic axisymmetric conical inlets of internal compression, Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, 2015, Vol. 22, No. 5, P. 545–558.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu.P. Gounko, I.I. Mazhul, and V.I. Nurutdinov, Numerical investigation of supersonic flow breakdown at the inlet duct throttling, Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, 2014, Vol. 21, No. 2, P. 157–170.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A.Yu. Melnikov and V.I. Zvegintsev, Investigation of deceleration supersonic flow in a long cylindrical channel with formation pseudo-shock, in: Int. Conf. on Measurement and Test Methodologies, Technologies and Applica-tions (MTMTA2016). April 24-25, 2016. Thailand, Phuket. DEStech Publications, Inc., 2016, P. 259–264.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A.Yu. Melnikov and V.I. Zvegintsev, Supersonic flow deceleration in a long cylindrical channel with pseudo-shock formation, in: AIP Conf. Proc., 2016, Vol. 770, P. 770–030007–030007–7.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. Ikui, K. Matsuo, H. Mochizuki, and K. Somekama, Pseudo-shock waves in a divergent channel, Bull. JSME, 1980, Vol. 23, No. 175, P. 20–25 (cited from [16]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Inlets of High-Speed Flying Vehicles, Obzory TsAGI, 1985, No.658.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    V.N. Ostras and V.I. Penzin, Experimental investigation of the friction force in a cylindrical duct in the presence of a pseudo-shock, Uchenye zapiski TsAGI, 1974, Vol. 5, No. 2, P. 151–155.ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics SB RASNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Novosibirsk State Technical UniversityNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations