Skip to main content
Log in

The surface roughness effect on the performance of supersonic ejectors

  • Published:
Thermophysics and Aeromechanics Aims and scope

Abstract

The paper presents the numerical simulation results of the surface roughness influence on gas-dynamic processes inside flow parts of a supersonic ejector. These simulations are performed using two commercial CFD solvers (Star- CCM+ and Fluent). The results are compared to each other and verified by a full-scale experiment in terms of global flow parameters (the entrainment ratio: the ratio between secondary to primary mass flow rate - ER hereafter) and local flow parameters distribution (the static pressure distribution along the mixing chamber and diffuser walls). A detailed comparative study of the employed methods and approaches in both CFD packages is carried out in order to estimate the roughness effect on the logarithmic law velocity distribution inside the boundary layer. Influence of the surface roughness is compared with the influence of the backpressure (static pressure at the ejector outlet). It has been found out that increasing either the ejector backpressure or the surface roughness height, the shock position displaces upstream. Moreover, the numerical simulation results of an ejector with rough walls in the both CFD solvers are well quantitatively agreed with each other in terms of the mean ER and well qualitatively agree in terms of the local flow parameters distribution. It is found out that in the case of exceeding the “critical roughness height” for the given boundary conditions and ejector’s geometry, the ejector switches to the “off-design” mode and its performance decreases considerably.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E.Ya. Sokolov and N.M. Zinger, Jet Apparatuses, Energoatomizdat, Moscow, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. V.G. Tsegelsky, Two-phase jet apparatuses, Moscow State Techn. Univ. named after Bauman, Moscow, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  3. ESDU No. 86030. Ejectors and jet pumps. Design for steam driven flow, 1986.

  4. F. Mazzelli and A. Milazzo, Performance analysis of a supersonic ejector cycle working with R245fa, Int. J. Refrigeration, 2015. Vol. 49, P. 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Menter, J.C. Ferreira, T. Esch, and B. Konno, The SST turbulence model with improved wall treatment for heat transfer predictions in gas turbines, in: Proc. Int. Gas Turbine Congress, Tokyo, 2003. P. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Bartosiewicz, Z. Aidoun, P. Desevaux, and Y. Mercadier, CFD-experiments integration in the evaluation of six turbulence models for supersonic ejectors modeling, in: Conf. Proc., Integrating CFD and Experiments, Glasgow, UK, 2003. P. 561–566.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Bartosiewicz, Z. Aidoun, P. Desevaux, and Y. Mercadier, Numerical and experimental investigations on supersonic ejectors, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 2005. No. 26, P. 56–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Colonna, S. Harincks, S. Rebay, and A. Guardone, Real-gas effects in organic Rankine cycle turbine nozzles, J. Propulsion and Power, 2008. Vol. 24, No. 2, P. 282–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. L.M. Lujan, R. Serrano, V. Dolz, and J. Sanchez, Model approximation to an equation of state for the R245fa fluid in an expansion process, J. Appl. Thermal Engng, 2012. Vol. 40, P. 248–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69, 2003. http://www.webbook.nist.gov/chemistry.

  11. T. Knopp, B. Eisfeld, and J.B. Calvo, A new extension for k–ω turbulence models to account for wall roughness, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 2009. Vol. 30, P. 54–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. CD-Adapco Star-SSM+ documentation help.

  13. Ansys Fluent documentation help.

  14. J. Nikuradse, Laws of Flow in Rough Pipes, NACA, Washington, 1950. Technical Memorandum 1292.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Schlichting, Boundary Layer Theory, 6th Edition, McGraw Hill, New York, 1968.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. T. Cebeci and P. Bradshaw, Momentum Transfer in Boundary Layers, Hemisphere Publ. Corp., N.Y., 1977.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. T. Adams, C. Grant, and H. Watson, A simple algorithm to relate measured surface roughness to equivalent sand-grain roughness, Int. J. Mech. Engng Mechatron, 2012. No. 1, P. 66–71.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M.V. Zagarola and A.J. Smits, Mean-flow scaling of turbulent pipe flow, J. Fluid Mech., 1998. Vol. 373, P. 33–79.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. A.V. Sobolev, V.I. Zapryagaev, and V.M. Malkov, Single-stage ejector with high compression ratio, Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, 2005. Vol. 12, No. 1, P. 141–150.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. E. Aronson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brezgin, D.V., Aronson, K.E., Mazzelli, F. et al. The surface roughness effect on the performance of supersonic ejectors. Thermophys. Aeromech. 24, 553–561 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869864317040060

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869864317040060

Key words

Navigation