Abstract
An experimental study of different control methods for hypersonic air inlets aimed at ensuring reliable starting of these apparatuses and improving their operating characteristics in the range of Mach numbers 2 to 8 is reported. Conditions for boundary-layer separation and possibilities for preventing this separation by using modified diffuser configurations and/or perforation bleedage are examined. An air-inlet model was tested for operation in an intermittent wind tunnel and in a blow-down wind tunnel respectively in the Mach-number ranges 2 to 6 and 5 to 8. Distributions of static and total air pressures on the walls of the model and in several cross sections were measured, together with air flow coefficients and total-pressure recovery coefficients. Perforation bleedage is shown to offer an efficient means to facilitate air-inlet starting. Perforation bleed has enabled a more than two-fold increase in the air flow coefficient on the model with sidewalls. A perforation-bleed panel installed closer to the air-inlet throat proved to be more efficient. The possibility of sudden starting of the air-inlet apparatus was checked in the intermittent wind tunnel; it was shown that, here, sudden starting could be realized. The data obtained in the intermittent wind tunnel proved to be consistent with data obtained in the blow-down wind tunnel with up to 150-ms blowdown time.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
F.S. Billig, Supersonic combustion ramjet missile, J. Propulsion and Power, 1995, Vol. 11, No. 6, P. 1139–1146.
F. Falempin and L. Serre, LEA flight test program — a mandatory step in the European R&T effort hypersonic air-breathing propulsion, ISABE (Int. Symp. on Air-Breathing Engines) Paper, 2005, No. 2005-1089.
F.S. Billig and D. Van Wie, Efficiency parameters for inlets operating at hypersonic speeds, Proc. 8th Int. Symp. on Air-Breathing Engines (ISABE), American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), 1987, No. 87-7047, P. 118–129.
D.M. Van Wie, F.T. Kwok, and R.F. Walsh, Starting characteristics of supersonic inlets, AIAA Paper, 1996, No. 96-2914.
V. Andreev and V. Penzin, Some aspects of scramjet vehicle integration, scramjet propulsion, E.T. Curran and S.N.B. Murthy (Eds.), Scramjet Propulsion, 2000, Vol. 189, P. 337–352.
W. Koschel, W. Rick, and T. Ruggeberg, Study of flow phenomena in high-speed inlets, AIAA Paper, 1992, No. 92-5029.
D.S. Dolling, Fifty years of shock-wave / boundary-layer interaction research: What next, AIAA J., 2001, Vol. 39, No. 8, P. 3–15.
F. Falempin, X. Montazel, M. Goldfeld, R. Nestoulia, and A. Starov, Investigation of two-mode ramjet/scramjet inlet, ISABE-99-7040, 1999.
M.A. Goldfeld, A.V. Starov, and Yu.V. Semenova, Compressible boundary layer investigation for ramjet / scramjet inlets and nozzles, in: Proc. Fifth Europ. Symp. on Aerothermodynamics for Space Vehicles, Cologne, Germany, 2004, P. 547–551.
D. Schulte, A. Henckels, and R. Neubacher, Manipulation of shock / boundary-layer interactions in hypersonic inlets, J. Propulsion and Power, 2001, Vol. 17, No. 3, P. 585–590.
F. Falempin, M.A. Goldfeld, R.V. Nestoulia, and A.V. Starov, Experimental investigation of variable-geometry inlet at Mach number from 2 to 8, ISABE-2003-1162, 2003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by the International Scientific and Engineering Center (Contract No. 887) and by MBDA, France.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Falempin, F., Goldfeld, M.A., Semenova, Y.V. et al. Experimental study of different control methods for hypersonic air inlets. Thermophys. Aeromech. 15, 1–9 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869864308010010
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869864308010010