Skip to main content
Log in

First finds of Permian conodonts in eastern Iran and once again on the Guadalupian series base in Permian sections of the Tethyan realm

  • Published:
Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conodonts found for the first time in eastern Iran (the Bage-Vang section) are characterized. Beds with conodonts also yield fusulinids that is suitable for refining correlation of conodont and fusulinid zonations. Stratigraphic ranges of different conodont species in the Bage-Vang section are correlated with those in the Luodian section (South China), where conodonts are also accompanied by fusulinids. As a result, some previous inferences concerning position of the Guadalupian Series base in the Tethyan sections are refined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. N. Behnken, B. R. Wardlaw, and L. N. Stout, “Conodont Biostratigraphy of the Permian Meade Peak Phosphatic Shale Member, Phosphoria Formation, Southeastern Idaho,” Contrib. Univ. Wyoming 24(2), 9–190 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. L. Clark and Wang Cheng-Yuan, “Permian Neogondolellids from South China: Significance for Evolution of the Serrata and Carinata Groups in North America,” J. Paleontology 62(1), 132–138 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Gullo and H. Kozur, “Conodonts from the Pelagic Deep-Water Permian of Central Western Sicily (Italy),” Neues Jahrb. N. Jb. Geol. Paläontol, Abh. 184(2), 203–234 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ch. M. Henderson, Jin Yugan, B. R. Wardlaw, and Mei Shilong, “Conodont Succession in Nashui/Luodian Section, South China, and Its Significance in Correlation of Cisuralian and Guadalupian Conodont and Fusulinacean Zones,” in XIV ICCP. Pander Soc. Canad. Paleontol. Conf. Programme with Abstracts, 1999, p. 67.

  5. K. I. Ishii, Y. Okimura, and K. Nakazawa, “On the Genus Colaniella and Its Biostratigraphic Significance,” J. Geosciences, Osaka City University 19(6), 107–138 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Jenny-Deshusses and A. Baud, “Colaniella, foraminifère index du Permien tardif tethysien: propositions pour une taxonomie simplifiée, retardition géographique et environnements,” Ecl. Geol. Helveiae 82(3), 869–901 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. V. Kotlyar, Yu. D. Zakharov, B. V. Kochirkevich, et al., Late Permian Stage of the Organic World Evolution. Dzhulfian and Dorashamian Stages of the USSR (Leningrad, Nauka, 1983) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. W. Kozur, “Gullodus n. gen. — a New Conodont Genus and Remarks to the Pelagic Permian and Triassic of Western Sicily,” Jahrb. Geol. B.-A. 136(1), 77–87 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. W. Kozur, “New Stratigraphic Results in the Permian of the Sosio Valley Area, Western Sicily, Italy,” in Proceedings of the XIII International Congress on the Carboniferous and Permian (Inst. Geol., 1997), Vol. 157, pp. 145–157.

  10. H. W. Kozur, “The Permian Conodont Biochronology. Progress and Problems,” Proc. Royal R. Soc. of Victoria. Permian of Eastern Tethys: Biostratigraphy, Palaeogeography, and Resources 110(1, 2), 197–220 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. W. Kozur, V. I. Davydov, and G. V. Kotlyar, “Preliminary Report on the Permian Conodont Fauna of Darvas and SE Pamir and Its Importance for the Permian Time Scale,” Permophyles, No. 24, 13–15 (1994).

  12. H. W. Kozur and V. I. Davydov, “The Importance of the Permian of the Sosio Valley (Western Sicily, Italy) for Guadalupian Stratigraphy. 1996,” in Abstracts and Proceedings of the Second International Guadalupian Symposium, Guadalupian II, Alpine, Texas, April 10–13, 1996 (Washington, 1996), pp. 11–15.

  13. H. W. Kozur and H. Mostler, “Guadalupian (Middle Permian) Conodonts of Sponge-Bearing Limestones from the Margins of the Delaware Basin, West Texas,” Geol. Croat. 48(2), 107–128 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. W. Kozur, B. R. Wardlaw, A. Baud, et al., “The Guadalupian Smooth Mesogondolella Faunas and Their Possible Correlation with the International Permian Scale,” Permophyles, No. 38, 15–21 (2001).

  15. T. B. Leonova and V. Yu. Dmitriev, Early Permian Ammonoids of Southeastern Pamirs (Nauka, Moscow, 1989) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. Ja. Leven, Stratigraphy and Fusulinids of Permian Deposits of Pamirs (Nauka, Moscow, 1967) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. Ja. Leven, “On the Possibility of Using the Global Stage Scale of the Permian within the Tethys,” Stratigr. Geol. Korrelyatsiya 9(2), 15–29 (2001) [Stratigr. Geol. Correlation 9 (2), 118 (2001)].

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. Ja. Leven and M. H. Vaziri, “Carboniferous-Permian Stratigraphy and Fusulinids of Eastern Iran. The Permian in the Bage-Vang Section (Shirgesht Area),” Riv. Ital. Paleontol. Stratigr. 110(2), 441–465 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. Ja. Leven and M. F. Bogoslovskaya, “The Roadian Stage of the Permian and Problems of the Global Correlation,” Stratigr. Geol. Korrelyatsiya 14(2), 67–78 (2006) [Stratigr. Geol. Correlation 14 (2), 164–173 (2006)].

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. Ja. Leven, V. I. Davydov, and M. N. Gorgij, “Pennsylvanian Stratigraphy and Fusulinids of Central and Eastern Iran,” Palaeontologia Electronica, 9(1), 1–36 (2006). 10 MB; http://palaeo-electronica.org/paleo/2006_1/iran/issue1_06.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sh. Mei and Ch. M. Henderson, “Evolution of Permian Conodont Provincialism and Its Significance in Global Correlation and Paleoclimate Implication,” Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaecol. 170, 237–260 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. K. Miller and W. M. Furnish, “Permian Ammonoids from Tunisia,” J. Paleontol. 31(4), 705–712 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. Partoazar, “Permian Deposits in Iran. Treatise on the Geology of Iran,” Rep. Geol. Surv. Iran, No. 22, 1–340 (1995).

  24. A. N. Reimers, Conodonts of the Lower Permian in the Urals, Caspian Region, and Pamirs (GEOS, Moscow, 1999) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Ruttner, M. Nabavi, and J. Hajian, “Geology of the Shirgesht Area (Tabas Area, East Iran),” Rep. Geol. Surv. Iran, No. Rep. 4, 4–133 (1968).

  26. J. J. Stöcklin, “Stratigraphic Lexicon of Iran. Part 1: Central, North and East Iran,” Rep. Geol. Surv. Iran, No. Rep. 18, 1–338 (1971).

  27. J. J. Stöcklin, J. Eftekhar-Nezhad, and A. Hushmandzadeh, “Geology of the Shotori Range (Tabas Area, East Iran),” Rep. Geol. Surv. Iran, No. Rep. 3, 1–69 (1965).

  28. B. R. Wardlaw and J. W. Collinson, “Conodont Paleoecology of the Permian Phosphoria Formation and Related Rocks of Wyoming and Adjacent Areas,” Spec. Pap. Geol. Surv. of America. No. Special Paper 196, 263–281 (1984).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © E.Ja. Leven, A.N. Reimers, H.W. Kozur, 2007, published in Stratigrafiya. Geologicheskaya Korrelyatsiya, 2007, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 63–72.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leven, E.J., Reimers, A.N. & Kozur, H.W. First finds of Permian conodonts in eastern Iran and once again on the Guadalupian series base in Permian sections of the Tethyan realm. Stratigr. Geol. Correl. 15, 57–66 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869593807010054

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869593807010054

Key words

Navigation