Skip to main content
Log in

Modern volcanism in the Earth’s northern hemisphere and its relations with the evolution of the North Pangaea modern supercontinent and with the spatial distribution of hotspots on the Earth: The hypothesis of relations between mantle plumes and deep subduction

  • Published:
Petrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper reports results of the analysis of the spatial distribution of modern (younger than 2 Ma) volcanism in the Earth’s northern hemisphere and relations between this volcanism and the evolution of the North Pangaea modern supercontinent and with the spatial distribution of hotspots of the Earth’s mantle. Products of modern volcanism occur in the Earth’s northern hemisphere in Eurasia, North America, Greenland, in the Atlantic Ocean, Arctic, Africa, and the Pacific Ocean. As anywhere worldwide, volcanism in the northern hemisphere of the Earth occurs as (a) volcanism of mid-oceanic ridges (MOR), (b) subduction-related volcanism in island arcs and active continental margins (IA and ACM), (c) volcanism in continental collision (CC) zones, and (d) within-plate (WP) volcanism, which is related to mantle hotspots, continental rifts, and intercontinental belts. These types of volcanic areas are fairly often neighboring, and then mixed volcanic areas occur with the persistent participation of WP volcanism. Correspondingly, modern volcanism in the Earth’s northern hemisphere is of both oceanic and continental nature. The latter is obviously related to the evolution of the North Pangaea modern supercontinent, because it results from the Meso-Cenozoic evolution of Wegener’s Late Paleozoic Pangaea. North Pangaea in the Cenozoic comprises Eurasia, North and South America, India, and Africa and has, similar to other supercontinents, large sizes and a predominantly continental crust. The geodynamic setting and modern volcanism of North Pangaea are controlled by two differently acting processes: the subduction of lithospheric slabs from the Pacific Ocean, India, and the Arabia, a process leading to the consolidation of North Pangaea, and the spreading of oceanic plates on the side of the Atlantic Ocean, a process that “wedges” the supercontinent, modifies its morphology (compared to that of Wegener’s Pangaea), and results in the intervention of the Atlantic geodynamic regime into the Arctic. The long-lasting (for >200 Ma) preservation of tectonic stability and the supercontinental status of North Pangaea are controlled by subduction processes along its boundaries according to the predominant global compression environment. The long-lasting and stable subduction of lithospheric slabs beneath Eurasia and North America not only facilitated active IA + ACM volcanism but also resulted in the accumulation of cold lithospheric material in the deep mantle of the region. The latter replaced the hot mantle and forced this material toward the margins of the supercontinent; this material then ascended in the form of mantle plumes (which served as sources of WP basite magmas), which are diverging branches of global mantle convection, and ascending flows of subordinate convective systems at the convergent boundaries of plates. Subduction processes (compressional environments) likely suppressed the activity of mantle plumes, which acted in the northern polar region of the Earth (including the Siberian trap magmatism) starting at the latest Triassic until nowadays and periodically ascended to the Earth’s surface and gave rise to WP volcanism. Starting at the breakup time of Wegener’s Pangaea, which began with the opening of the central Atlantic and systematically propagated toward the Arctic, marine basins were formed in the place of the Arctic Ocean. However, the development of the oceanic crust (Eurasian basin) took place in the latter as late as the Cenozoic. Before the appearance of the Gakkel Ridge and, perhaps, also the oceanic portion of the Amerasian basin, this young ocean is thought to have been a typical basin developing in the central part of supercontinents. Wegener’s Pangaea broke up under the effect of mantle plumes that developed during their systematic propagation to the north and south of the Central Atlantic toward the North Pole. These mantle plumes were formed in relation with the development of global and local mantle convection systems, when hot deep mantle material was forced upward by cold subducted slabs, which descended down to the core-mantle boundary. The plume (WP) magmatism of Eurasia and North America was associated with surface collision- or subduction-related magmatism and, in the Atlantic and Arctic, also with surface spreading-related magmatism (tholeiite basalts).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. L. Anderson and J. Natland, “A Brief History of the Plume Hypothesis and Its Competitors: Concept and Controversy,” in Plates, Plumes, and Paradigms, Ed. by G. R. Foulger, Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 388, 31–54 (2005).

  2. N. A. Bogdanov, “Tectonics of the Arctic Ocean,” Geotektonika, No. 3, 13–30 (2004) [Geotectonics 38, 166–181 (2004)].

  3. K. L. Buchan and R. E. Ernst, “The High Arctic Large Igneous Province (HALIP): Evidence for an Associated Giant Radiating Dyke Swarm,” www.largeigne-ousprovinces.org/LOM.html/ (2006).

  4. K. Burke and J. F. Dewey, “Plume-Generated Triple Junctions: Key Indicators in Applying Plate Tectonics to Old Rocks,” J. Geol. 81, 406–433 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. S. Collins and S. A. Pisarevsky, “Amalgamating Eastern Gondwana: The Evolution of the Circum-Indian Orogens,” Earth-Sci. Rev. 71(3–4), 229–270 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. W. D. Dalziel, “Pacific Margins of Laurentia and Antarctica-Australia as a Conjugate Rift Pair: Evidence and Implications for an Eocambrian Supercontinent,” Geology 19, 598–601 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. N. L. Dobretsov, A. G. Kirdyashkin, and A. A. Kirdyashkin, Deep Geodynamics (Nauka-GEO, Novosibirsk, 2001) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. I. Filatova and V. E. Khain, “Tectonics of the Eastern Arctic Region,” Geotektonika, No. 3, 3–29 (2007) [Geotectonics 41, 171–194 (2007)].

  9. V. Yu. Glebovsky, V. D. Kaminskii, A. N. Minakov, et al., “Formation of the Eurasia Basin in the Arctic Ocean as Inferred from Geohistorical Analysis of the Anomalous Magnetic Field,” Geotektonika, No. 4, 21–42 (2006) [Geotectonics 40, 263–281 (2006)].

  10. I. S. Gramberg, “Geology and Mineral Resources of the Oceans and Their Continental Margins in Terms of Multistage Evolution of the Oceans: A Comparative Study,” Geotektonika, No. 6, 3–19 (2001) [Geotectonics 35, 423–437 (2001)].

  11. G. Hantke, “Ubersicht uber Vulkanische Tatigkeit 1957–1959,” Bull. Volk. 24, 321–348 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. P. F. Hoffman, “Did the Breakout of Laurentia Turn Gondwanaland Inside-Out?,” Science 252, 1409–1412 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. K. Hoernle, Y. S. Zhang, and D. Graham, “Seismic and Geochemical Evidence for Large-Scale Mantle Upwelling Beneath Eastern Atlantic and Western and Central Europe,” Nature 374, 34–39 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Iwamori, “Transportation of H2O Beneath the Japan and Its Implication for Global Water Circulation,” Chem. Geol. 219, 182–198 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D. V. Kovalenko, Paleomagnetism of the Geological Complexes of Kamchatka and South Koryakia (Nauchnyi Mir, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. I. Kovalenko, V. B. Naumov, A. V. Girnis, et al., “Average Compositions of Magmas and Mantle Sources of Mid-Ocean Ridges and Intraplate Oceanic and Continental Settings Estimated from the Data on Melt Inclusions and Quenched Glasses of Basalts,” Petrologiya 15(4), 361–396 (2007) [Petrology 15, 335–368 (2007)].

    Google Scholar 

  17. V. I. Kovalenko, V. V. Yarmolyuk, and O. A. Bogatikov, “Geodynamic Setting of Recent Volcanism in North Eurasia,” Geotektonika, No. 5, 3–24 (2009a) [Geotectonics 43, 337–357 (2009a)].

  18. V. I. Kovalenko, V. V. Yarmolyuk, and O. A. Bogatikov, “The Recent Supercontinent in the Northern Hemisphere of the Earth (North Pangea): Magmatic and Geodynamic Evolution,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 427(3), 1–6 (2009b) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 427, 897–901 (2009b)].

    Google Scholar 

  19. V. I. Kovalenko, V. V. Yarmolyuk, and O. A. Bogatikov, “Regularities of Spatial Distribution of Mantle Hot Spots of the Modern Earth,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 427(5), 654–658 (2009c) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 427, 924–928 (2009c)].

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yu. G. Kutinov, Ecogeodynamics of the Arctic Segment of the Earth’s Crust (Inst. Ekol. Probl. Severa, Arkhang. Nauchn. Ts. RAN, Yekaterinburg, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. Lithgow-Bertelloni, and M. A. Richards, “The Dynamics of Cenozoic and Mesozoic Plate Motions,” Rev. Geophys. 36(1), 27–78 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Z. X. Li and C. M. Powell, “An Outline of the Paleogeographic Evolution of the Australasian Region Since the Beginning of the Neoproterozoic,” Earth Sci. Rev. 53, 237–277 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Z-X. Li and S. Zhong, “Supercontinent-Superplume Coupling, True Polar Wander and Plume Mobility: Plate Dominance in Whole-Mantle Tectonics,” Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 176(3–4), 143–156 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. H. D. Maher, Jr., “Manifestations of the Cretaceous High Arctic Large Igneous Province in Svalbard,” J. Geol. 9, 91–104 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Maruyama, “Plume-Tectonics,” J. Geol. Soc. Japan 100, 24–49 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. Maruyama, M. Santosh, and D. Zhao, “Superplume, Supercontinent and Postperovskite: Mantle Dynamics and Anti-Plate Tectonics on the Core-Mantle Boundary,” Gondwana Res. 11, 7–37 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. E. E. Milanovskii and N. V. Koronovskii, Orogenic Volcanism and Tectonics of the Alpine Belt of Eurasia (Nedra, Moscow, 1973) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. G. Meert and R. Van Der Voo, “The Assembly of Gondwana 800-550 Ma,” J. Geodynamics 23(3–4), 223–235 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. W. J. Morgan, “Convection Plumes in the Lower Mantle,” Nature 230, 42–43 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. M. V. Portnyagin, D. P. Savel’ev, K. Kherile, et al., Geochemical Evidence for Participation of the Hawaiian Plume in the Formation of the Ophiolites of the Kamchatsky Mys Peninsula, Eastern Kamchatka, in Proceedings of Symposium “Volcanism and Geodynamics,” Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskii, Russia, 2009 (Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskii, 2009), Vol. 2, pp. 465–466 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yu. M. Pushcharovskii, “The Global Expansion of Tectonic-Geodynamic Processes from the Indian-Atlantic Segment of the Earth into the Pacific Segment,” Geotektonika, No. 1, 3–12 (2002) [Geotectonics 36, 1–10 (2002)].

  32. Yu. M. Pushcharovskii, A. A. Mossakovskii, and S. V. Ruzhentsev, “Pacific and Indo-Atlantic Tectonic Segments of the Earth,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 364(1), 88–91 (1999a) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 364, 9–12 (1999a)].

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yu. M. Pushcharovskii, E. N. Melankholina, A. A. Mossakovskii, et al., “Deep Tectonics of the Earth: Structure, Structural Asymmetry, and Geodynamics of Geospheres,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 366(1), 88–99 (1999b) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 366, 447–451 (1999b)].

    Google Scholar 

  34. C. R. Scotese, Paleogeographic Atlas, (University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  35. C. R. Scotese, “A Continental Drift Flipbook,” J. Geol. 112(6), 729–741 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. E. I. Shipilov, “Generations of Spreading Basins and Stages of Breakdown of Wegener’s Pangea in the Geodynamic Evolution of the Arctic Ocean,” Geotektonika, No. 2, 1–23 (2008) [Geotectonics 42, 105–124 (2008)].

  37. O. Spies, G. Lensch, and A. Mihm, “Geochemistry of the Post-Ophiolitic Tertiary Volcanics between Sabsevar and Quchan, NE Iran,” Geol. Surv. Iran. Geod. Project, No. 51, 247–265 (1983).

  38. “Volcanism and Subduction: The Kamchatka Region,” Ed. by J. Eichelberger, E. Gordeev, P. Izbekov, M. Kasahara, and J. Lees, Geophys. Monogr. 172, (AGU, Washington, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  39. A. Wegener, The Origin of Continents and Oceans. (J. Biram. Trans) (Methuen and Co. Ltd, London, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  40. J. T. Wilson, “A Possible Origin of the Hawaiian Islands,” Can. J. Phys. 41, 863–870 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  41. R. White and D. McKenzie, “Mantle Plumes and Flood Basalts,” J. Geophys. Res. 100, 17543–17585 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. V. V. Yarmolyuk, V. I. Kovalenko, and V. G. Ivanov, “Within-Plate Late Mesozoic-Cenozoic Volcanic Province of Asia: Projection of Hot Mantle Field,” Geotektonika, No. 5, 41–67 (1995).

  43. V. V. Yarmolyuk, O. A. Bogatikov, and V. I. Kovalenko, “Late Cenozoic Transcontinental Structures and Magmatism of the Earth’s Euro-African Segment and Geodynamics of Its Formation,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 395(1), 91–95 (2004) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 395, 183–186 (2004)].

    Google Scholar 

  44. V. V. Yarmolyuk, V. I. Kovalenko, A. M. Kozlovsky, et al., “Crust-Forming Processes in the Hercynides of the Central Asian Foldbelt,” Petrology 16(7), 679–709 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. V. V. Yarmolyuk, V. I. Kovalenko, V. P. Kovach, et al., Crust-Forming Processes in the Hercynides of the Central Asian Fold Belt and Their Imprint in the Composition and Magmatic Sources of the Gobi-Tien Shan Rift Zone, in “Tectonic Problems of Central Asia” (GEOS, Moscow, 2009) (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  46. “The Youngest Volcanism of North Eurasia: Regularities of Evolution, Volcanic Hazard, and Relation with Deep-Seated Processes and Environmental and Climatic Changes,” in Environmental and Climatic Changes: Natural and Related Technogenic Catastrophes, Ed. by V. I. Kovalenko, V. V. Yarmolyuk, and O. A. Bogatikov (IGEM RAN, Moscow, 2008), Vol. 2 [in Russian].

  47. D. Zhao, “Global Tomographic Images of Mantle Plumes and Subducting Slabs: Insight Into Deep Earth Dynamics,” Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 146, 3–35 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. D. Zhao, “Seismic Images Under 60 Hotspots: Search for Mantle Plumes,” Gondwana Res. 12, 335–355 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Yu. A. Zorin, E. V. Balk, M. R. Novoselova, and E. Kh. Turutanov, “Thickness of the Lithosphere beneath Mongolia-Siberian Mountainous System and Adjacent Regions,” Fiz. Zemli, No. 7, 32–42 (1988).

  50. Yu. A. Zorin, V. M. Kozhevnikov, M. R. Novoselova, and E. Kh. Turutanov, “Thickness of the Litosphere beneath the Baikal Rift Zone and Adjacent Regions,” Tectonophysics 168, 327–337 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yu. A. Zorin, E. Kh. Turutanov, V. V. Mordvinova, et al., “The Baikal Rift Zone: The Effect of Mantle Plumes on Older Structure,” Tectonophysics 371, 153–173 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yu. A. Zorin and E. Kh. Turutanov, “Regional Isostatic Gravity Anomaly and Mantle Plumes in the Southern East Sayan, Russia,” Geol. Geofiz. 45(10), 1248–1258 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Yu. A. Zorin and E. Kh. Turutanov, “Plumes and Geodynamics of the Baikalian Rift Zone,” Geol. Geofiz. 46(7), 683–697 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Yu. A. Zorin, E. Kh. Turutanov, V. M. Kozhevnikov, et al., “On epy Nature of the Cenozoic Upper Mantle Plumes in Eastern Siberia, Russia, and Central Mongolia,” Geol. Geofiz. 47(10), 1056–11070 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  55. 60 Years in Arctic, Antarctic, and World Ocean, Ed. by V. L. Ivanov and V. D. Kaminskii (VNIIOkeangeologiya, St. Petersburg, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. I. Kovalenko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kovalenko, V.I., Yarmolyuk, V.V. & Bogatikov, O.A. Modern volcanism in the Earth’s northern hemisphere and its relations with the evolution of the North Pangaea modern supercontinent and with the spatial distribution of hotspots on the Earth: The hypothesis of relations between mantle plumes and deep subduction. Petrology 18, 657–676 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869591110070027

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869591110070027

Keywords

Navigation