Skip to main content
Log in

The Energy Properties of the Seismic Process and the Feasibility of Introducing a Generalized Energy Class of Earthquakes

  • Published:
Journal of Volcanology and Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper gives a scale of earthquake energy class KF that is to standardize the relevant data based on the existing scales: MS, MW, mb, KS, among many others. The conceptual novelty of the scale we propose consists in shifting the emphasis from seismometric issues that are traditional in such cases, which are concerned with the recording of seismic waves, as well as with issues arising in discussions of their generation and propagation, toward an effective use of basic energy properties of the seismic process (the Gutenberg–Richter law). In the most general case, this approach can significantly simplify the development of regression relations between different earthquake size scales, but the most promising problem consists in developing a single generalized scale. A particular solution of the problem is presented as the development of such a scale for earthquakes of Kamchatka. The KF scale rests on the energy class \(K_{{S1.2}}^{{F68}}\) proposed by S.A. Fedotov (KS at the Kamchatka Branch (KB) of the National Seismological Centre, Geophysical Survey, Russian Academy of Sciences (NSC GS RAS) and on the generally accepted mb magnitude (ISC).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/search/.

  2. http://sdis.emsd.ru/info/earthquakes/catalogue.php.

  3. http://www.isc.ac.uk.

  4. The saw-toothed appearance in the right part of the plot can be considerably diminished by linear smoothing applied, not to the variational series of energy classes K, but to the corresponding variational series of 1/S. This variant has greater promise, but there is no essential difference between the two kinds of smoothing in the framework of the present study.

  5. https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake-hazards/science/earthquake-magnitude-energy-release-and-shaking-intensity?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects.

REFERENCES

  1. Aki, K., Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula lg N = a – bM and its confidence limits, Bull. Earth. Res. Inst., 1965, vol. 43, pp. 237‒239.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benioff, H., Earthquakes and rock creep, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., 1951, vol. 41, pp. 50‒62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Choy, G.L. and Boatwright, J.L., Global patterns of radiated seismic energy and apparent stress, J. Geophys. Res., 1995, vol. 100, pp. 18 205‒18 228.

  4. Di Giacomo, D., Grosser, H., Parolai, S., et al., Rapid determination of ME for strong to great shallow earthquakes, Geophys. Res. Letters., 2008, vol. 35. L1030. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fedotov, S.A. Energeticheskaya klassifikatsiya Kurilo-Kamchatskikh zemletryasenii i problema magnitud (The Energy Classification of Earthquakes and the Magnitude Problem), Moscow: Nauka, 1972.

  6. Fedotov, S.A., Dolgosrochnyi seismicheskii prognoz dlya Kurilo-Kamchatskoi dugi (Long-term Earthquake Prediction for the Kuril–Kamchatka Arc), Moscow: Nauka, 2005.

  7. Gusev, A.A. and Melnikova, V.N., Relationships between magnitudes for global and Kamchatkan earthquakes, Vulkanol. Seismol., 1990, no. 6, pp. 55–63.

  8. Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C.F., Seismicity of the Earth and Associated Phenomena, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kanamori, H., The energy release in great earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., 1977, vol. 82, pp. 2981‒2987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kukinov, A.M., Using order statistics and rank tests in data processing, in Poisk zavisimosti i otsenka pogreshnosti (Looking for Relationship and Estimating the Uncertainty), Pinsker, I.Sh., Editor-in-Chief, Moscow: Nauka, 1985, pp. 97–110.

  11. Lemzikov, V.K. and Gusev, A.A., The energy classification of near Kamchatka earthquakes based on coda level, Vulkanol. Seismol., 1989, no. 4, pp. 83–97.

  12. Riznichenko, Yu.V., A method for summing earthquakes to study seismic activity, Izv. AN SSSR, Ser. Geofiz., 1964, no. 7, pp. 969‒977.

  13. Sadovsky, M.A., Geofizika i fizika vzryva (Geophysics and Explosion Physics), Selected works, Moscow: Nauka, 2004.

  14. Solomatin, A.V., The law of earthquake recurrence and the energy balance of the seismic process, Voprosy Inzhenern. Seismol., 2011, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 39‒48.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Solomatin, A.V., The energy spectrum of the seismic process in application to long-term earthquake prediction and intermediate- and short-term updating of earthquake hazard, J. Volcanol. Seismol., 2021, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Solomatin.

Additional information

Translated by A. Petrosyan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Solomatin, A.V. The Energy Properties of the Seismic Process and the Feasibility of Introducing a Generalized Energy Class of Earthquakes. J. Volcanolog. Seismol. 16, 311–321 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0742046322040078

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0742046322040078

Keywords:

Navigation