Skip to main content
Log in

A New Way to Determine the Characteristic Size of the Source Zone

  • Published:
Journal of Volcanology and Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the results of analysis of the spatial distribution of repeated shocks. Data from the world earthquake catalog of USGS/NEIC from 1973 to 2014 were used. Short time intervals, no more than 10 hours after the main shock, and distances from the epicenter of the main shock, no more than 5°, were considered. The dependence of the number of repeated shocks on the distance from the epicenter was studied. Two properties of the spatial distribution of repeated shocks have been identified. The first property is that the curve describing spatial distribution has its maximum at a certain distance (approximately from 10 to 120 km) from the epicenter of the main shock. The logarithm of this distance is directly proportional to the magnitude of the main shock. The second property is that the position of the maximum does not depend on time, i.e., it is a stable spatial characteristic of the earthquake source. Based on these properties, a new way to determine the size of the rupture zone was proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Bonilla, M.G., Mark, R.K., and Lienkaemper, J.J., Statistical relations among earthquake magnitude, surface rupture length, and surface fault displacement, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 1984, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 2379–2411.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Darragh, R.B. and Bolt, B.A., A comment on the statistical regression relation between earthquake magnitude and fault rupture length, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 1987, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 1479–1484.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dowrick, D.J., Relations between earthquake magnitude and fault rupture dimensions: how regionally variable are they? Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 2004, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 776–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Henry, C. and Das, S., Aftershock zones of large shallow earthquakes: fault dimensions, aftershock area expansion and scaling relations, Geophys. J. Int., 2001, vol. 147, pp. 272–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Homma, S. and Seki, A., A relation between the area of aftershock region and the radius of the sensibility circle (continued), Zisin (J. Seism. Soc. Jap.) II, 1951, vol. 3, pp. 44–48 (in Japanese with English summary).

  6. Leonard, M., Self-consistent earthquake fault-scaling relations: Update and extension to stable continental strike-slip faults, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 2014, vol. 104(6), pp. 2953–2965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lunina, O.V., The influence of stress in the lithosphere on the relationships between seismogenic fault parameters and earthquake magnitude, Geol. Geofiz., 2001, no. 9, pp. 1389–1398.

  8. Purcaru, G. and Berckhemer, H., Quantitative relations of seismic source parameters and a classification of earthquakes, Tectonophysics, 1982, vol. 84, pp. 57–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Riznichenko, Yu.V., The source dimensions of the crustal earthquakes and the seismic moment, in Issledovaniya po fizike zemletryasenii (Studies in Earthquake Physics), Moscow: Nauka, 1976, pp. 9–27.

  10. Rodkin, M.V., On the regime of seismic activation in the generalized vicinity of the large earthquake, Fizicheskaya Mezomekhanika, 2008a, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 74–79.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rodkin, M.V., Seismicity in the generalized vicinity of large earthquakes, J. Volcanol. Seismol., 2008b, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 435–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ryal, A., Douglas, B.M., Melon, S.D., and Savage, W.I., The use of microearthquakes for determining the mechanism of stress release and elastic characteristics of earthquake sources in Nevada, Izv. AN SSSR, Fizika Zemli, 1972. no. 12, pp. 12–24.

  13. Seki, A. and Homma, S., A relation between the area of aftershock region and the radius of the sensibility circle, Zisin (J. Seism. Soc. Jap.), II, 1949, vol. 2, p. 37–40 (in Japanese with English summary).

  14. Strom, A.L., On relationships between parameters of discontinuities and earthquake magnitude, in Obshchemoskovskii Tektonofizicheskii Seminar, Personal communication, Moscow: IFZ RAN, 2014. http://www.ifz.ru/novosti/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D= 705&cHash=eeba62e91a7e6495f44c6174a0849398

  15. Utsu, T. and Seki, A., A relation between the area of aftershock region and the energy of main shock, Zisin (J. Seism. Soc. Jap.), II, 1955, vol. 7(4), pp. 233–240.

  16. Vakov, A.V., Relationships between magnitude and source dimension for earthquakes showing different types of slip, Sbornik Nauchn. Trudov Gidroproekta, 1988, no. 130, pp. 55–69.

  17. Vikulin, A.V., Fizika volnovogo seismicheskogo protsessa (Physics of the Seismic Wave Process), Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky: KOMSP GS RAN, 2003.

  18. Vikulin, A.V., Fizika Zemli i geodinamika (Physics of the Earth and Geodynamics), a handbook for geophysicists, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky: KAMGU Im. Vitusa Beringa, 2008.

  19. Wells, D.L. and Coppersmith, K.J., New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 1994, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 974–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zotov, O.D., Zavyalov, A.D., Guglielmi, A.V., and Lavrov, I.P., Space–time patterns in aftershock evolution, in Materialy 4-oi Vserossiiskoi konferentsii c mezhdunarodnym uchastiem “Triggernye effekty v geosistemakh” (Proc. 4th All-Russia Conference with international participation “Trigger Effects in Geosystems”), Adushkin, V.V. and Kocharyan, G.G., Eds., Moscow: GEOS, IDG RAN, 2017, pp. 121–126.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We express our gratitude to A.V. Guglielmi and B.I. Klain for many helpful discussions.

Funding

This work was carried out with partial financial support from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 18-05-00096), as well as the State Task Programs of the Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth RAS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. D. Zavyalov or O. D. Zotov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zavyalov, A.D., Zotov, O.D. A New Way to Determine the Characteristic Size of the Source Zone. J. Volcanolog. Seismol. 15, 19–25 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0742046321010139

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0742046321010139

Keywords:

Navigation