Skip to main content
Log in

Simulating the State of Stress and Strain in the Epicentral Zone of a Large Earthquake in Turkey (Izmit, 1999, M 7.4)

  • Published:
Journal of Volcanology and Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

An M 7.4 earthquake occurred near the town of Izmit on August 17, 1999 causing enormous casualties and economic losses: over 15 000 victims and several thousand irreparably damaged buildings and structures. The earthquake produced a set of fractures and fissures in the ground extending for more than 70 km from the Gulf of Izmit, with a new tectonic fault being formed that is more than 150-km long. This paper reports results from mathematical modeling of the state of stress and strain in the epicentral zone before and after the Izmit earthquake along with seismological observations. The modeling used a method for calculating the state of stress and strain in a blocky elastic isotropic heterogeneous medium that has been disturbed by a system of faults caused by an external tectonic stress field, with the boundary conditions being specified from seismological data. We show that the epicenters of large crustal earthquakes tend to occur in areas of highly concentrated stress intensity under a definite relationship between the principal stresses. The aftershock process is due to the release of stresses produced by a new rupture, while the resulting aftershock clusters correlate spatially with the zone of released stress intensity. The tectonic rupture is assumed to propagate toward zones of high stress intensity. The results obtained in this study can be useful in a deterministic approach to the assessment and prediction of earthquake hazard, as well as the length and area of earthquake rupture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Anderson, D.L. and Whitcomb, J.H., The dilatancy-diffusion model of earthquake prediction, in Eds R.L. Kovach, A. Nur. Proceedings of Conference on Tectonic Problems of the San Andreas Fault Systems, Kovach, R.L. and Nur, A., Eds., 1973, vol. 13, p. 417.

  2. Barka, A., The 17 August 1999 Izmit Earthquake, Science, 1999, vol. 285(5435), pp. 1858–1859. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5435.1858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bohnhoff, M., Bulut, F., Görgün, E., Milkereit, C. and Dresen, G., Seismotectonic setting at the North Anatolian Fault Zone after the 1999 Mw = 7.4 Izmit earthquake based on high-resolution aftershock locations, Advances in Geosciences, 2008, vol. 14, pp. 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brace, B.F., Myachkin, V.I., Dietrich, J.H., and Sobolev, G.A., Two models to explain earthquake precursors, in Sbornik sovetsko-amerikaskikh rabot po prognozu zemletryasenii (A Collection of Soviet–American Studies in Earthquake Prediction), Dushanbe: Donish, 1976, vol. 1(2), pp. 9–15.

  5. Bullen, K.E., On strain energy in the Earth’s upper mantle, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 1953, vol. 34(1), pp. 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Çakir, Z., Chabalier, J.B., Armijo, R., Meyer, B., Barka, A., and Peltzer, G., Coseismic and early post-seismic slip associated with the 1999 Izmit earthquake (Turkey), from SAR interferometry and tectonic field observations, Geophys. J. Intern., 2003, vol. 155(1), pp. 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.02001.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dinnik, A.N., Ustoichivost arok (The Stability of Arcs), Moscow: OGIZ GOSTEKHIZDAT, 1946.

  8. Dyadkov, P.G., Nazarov, L.A., and Nazarova, L.A., Simulating the state of crustal stress around an earthquake-generating fault in the central Baikal Rift, Geol. Geofiz., 1996, no. 9, pp. 71–78.

  9. Görgün, E., Zang, A., Bohnhoff, M., Milkereit, C., and Dresen, G., Analysis of Izmit aftershocks 25 days before the November 12th 1999 Düzce earthquake, Turkey, Tectonophysics, 2009, vol. 474(3–4), pp. 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.04.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gzovsky, M.V., A physical theory of generation of tectonic faults, in Problemy tectonofiziki (Problems of Tectonophysics), Moscow: Gosgeolizda, 1960, pp. 78–89.

  11. Hamiel, Y. and Fialko, Y., Structure and mechanical properties of faults in the North Anatolian Fault system from InSAR observations of coseismic deformation due to the 1999 Izmit (Turkey) earthquake, J. Geophys. Res., 2007, vol. 112, no. B07412. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004777

  12. Ito, A., Üçer, B., Bariş, S., Nakamura, A., Honkura, Y., Kono, T., Hori, S., and Hasegawa, A., Pektaş, R., and Isikara, A.M., Aftershock activity of the 1999 Izmit, Turkey, earthquake revealed from microearthquake observations, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2002, vol. 92(1), pp. 418–427. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120000802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kanamori, H., Mechanics of earthquakes, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 1994, vol. 22, pp. 207–237. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ea.22.050194.001231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kocharyan, G.G., Geomekhanika razlomov (Fault Geomechanics), Moscow: GEOS, 2016.

  15. Lekkas, E.L., The 1999 earthquake activity in Izmit–The study of actualistic strike-slip tectonic forms, Earthquake Geodynamics: Seismic Case Studies, 2004, vol. 12, pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Morozov, V.N., Kolesnikov, I.Yu., and Tatarinov, V.N., Modeling the hazard levels of stress-strain state in structural blocks in Nizhnekanskii Granitoid Massif for selecting nuclear waste disposal sites, Water Resources, 2012, vol. 39(7), pp. 756–769. https://doi.org/10.1134/S009780781207007X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Morozov, V.N. and Manevich, A.I., Modeling stress-strain state in the epicentral zone of the earthquake 26.01.2001, M = 6.9 (India), Geophysical Research, 2016, vol. 17(4), pp. 23–36. https://doi.org/10.21455/gr2016.4-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Morozov, V.N. and Manevich, A.I., Modeling stress-strain state in the epicentral zone of the earthquake 13.03.1992 Ms = 6.8 (Turkey), Geophysical Research, 2018, vol. 19(1), pp. 17–29. https://doi.org/10.21455/gr2018.1-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Morozov, V.N., Tatarinov, V.N., Kolesnikov, I,Yu., and Manevich, A.I., Simulating the state of stress and strain in the epicentral zone of a large Iranian earthquake (December 26, 2004, Mw = 6.6), Fizika Zemli, 2018a, no. 4, pp. 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0002333718040087

  20. Morozov, V.N., Manevich, A.I., and Tatarinov, V.N., Simulating the state of stress and strain and geodynamic regionalization in seismic regions, Gornyi Informatsionno-Analiticheskiy Byulleten, 2018b, no. 8, pp. 123–132. https://doi.org/10.25018/0236-1493-2018-8-0-123-132

  21. Neugebauer, J., Structures and kinematics of the North Anatolian Fault zone, Adapazarı-Bolu region, northwest Turkey, Tectonophysics, 1995, vol. 243(1–2), pp. 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)00194-E

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Özalaybey, S., Ergin, M., Aktar, M., Tapirdamaz, C., Biçmen, F., and Yörük, A., The 1999 Izmit earthquake sequence in Turkey: Seismological and tectonic aspects, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2002, vol. 92(1), pp. 376–386. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120000838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Reilinger, R.E., Ergintav, S., Bürgmann, R., McClusky, S., Lenk, O., Barka, A., Gurkan, O., Hearn, L., Feigl, K.L., Cakmak, R., Aktug, B., Ozener, H., and Töksoz, M.N., Coseismic and postseismic fault slip for the 17 August 1999, M = 7.5, Izmit, Turkey earthquake, Science, 2000, vol. 289(5484), pp. 1519–1524. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5484.1519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sherman, S.I., Seminsky, S.A., Bornyakov, S.A., Buddo, V.Yu., Lobatskaya, R.M., Adamovich, A.N., Truskov, V.A., and Babichev, A.A., Razlomoobrazovanie v litosfere: zony sdviga (Fault Generation in the Lithosphere: Shear Zones), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1992.

  25. Stein, R.S., Barka, A.A., and Dieterich, J.H., Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake stress triggering, Geophysical Journal International, 1997, vol. 128(3), pp. 594–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb05321.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yolsal-Çevikbilen, S., Biryol, C.B., Beck, S., Zandt, G., Taymaz, T., Adıyaman, H.E., and Özacar, A.A., 3-D crustal structure along the North Anatolian Fault Zone in north-central Anatolia revealed by local earthquake tomography, Geophysical J. International, 2012, vol. 188(3), pp. 819–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2011.05313.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zabrodin, V.Yu., Rybas, O.V., and Gilmanova, G.Z., Razlomnaya tektonika materikovoi chasti Dalnego Vostoka Rossii (The Fault Tectonics in Mainland Russian Far East), Vladivostok: Dalnauka, 2015.

  28. Zubkov, A.V., Stresses in the Ural crust, Litosfera, 2002, no. 3, pp. 3–18.

  29. Zubkov, A.V., A law that governs the in situ stresses in the crust, Litosfera, 2016, no. 5, pp. 146–151.

Download references

Funding

This work was carried out as a State Assignment of the Geophysical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences as authorized by the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to V. N. Morozov, V. N. Tatarinov or A. I. Manevich.

Additional information

Translated by A. Petrosyan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morozov, V.N., Tatarinov, V.N. & Manevich, A.I. Simulating the State of Stress and Strain in the Epicentral Zone of a Large Earthquake in Turkey (Izmit, 1999, M 7.4). J. Volcanolog. Seismol. 14, 105–114 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0742046320020049

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0742046320020049

Keywords:

Navigation