Skip to main content
Log in

Predictability of the Seismic Energy Flux: Southern Europe and the Mediterranean

  • Published:
Journal of Volcanology and Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper assessed the predictability of the seismic energy rate and large earthquakes in southern Europe and the Mediterranean according to the data from the United States Geological Survey catalog for 1900–2016. A nonlinear second-order differential equation is used as a mathematical model, and optimization and predictability estimation algorithms are this author’s. The estimates show a high predictability of energy rate trends. For 84 out of 217 large earthquakes in the region, we have found foreshock predictability, and aftershock predictability for 200 earthquakes. The predictability of large earthquakes begins to be seen at small (1.5–7.5 km) radii of hypocenter samples, increases rapidly at medium (15 and 30 km) radii, then more smoothly increases at a radius of 60 km and decreases slightly at a radius of 150 km. The predicted distance in time averages tens of days for foreshock predictability and thousands of days for aftershocks. The results demonstrate good prospects for the approximation–extrapolation approach to the prediction of both earthquakes themselves and the subsequent aftershock decay of seismic activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Notes

  1. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/search/

  2. Hereinafter, the forecast nonlinearity is given by |Kpn| and predictability, by Lp.

REFERENCES

  1. Bell, A.F., Naylor, M., Heap, M.J., and Main, I.G., Forecasting volcanic eruptions and other material failure phenomena: An evaluation of the failure forecast method, Geophys. Res. Letters, 2011, vol. 38, no. 15. LI5304. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bell, A.F., Naylor, M., and Main, I.G., The limits of predictability of volcanic eruptions from accelerating rates of earthquakes, Geophys J. Int., 2013, vol. 194, no. 3, pp. 1541–1553. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bell A.F., Kilburn C.R.J., Main I.G. Volcanic Eruptions, Real-Time Forecasting of // Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering. Springer, 2016. P. 3892–3906.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering, Springer, 2016.

  5. Fedotov, S.A., Solomatin, A.V., and Chernyshev, S.D., A long-term earthquake forecast for the Kuril-Kamchatka arc for the period from September 2011 to August 2016. The likely location, time, and evolution of the next great earthquake with M ≥ 7.7 in Kamchatka, J. Volcanol. Seismol., 2012, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 75–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fedotov, S.A. and Solomatin, A.V., The long-term earthquake forecast for the Kuril–Kamchatka island arc for the September 2013 to August 2018 period; The seismicity of the arc during preceding deep-focus earthquakes in the Sea of Okhotsk (in 2008, 2012, and 2013 at M = 7.7, 7.7, and 8.3), J. Volcanol. Seismol., 2015, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanamori, H., The energy release in great earthquake, J. Geophys. Res., 1977, vol. 82, pp. 2981–2987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Malyshev, A.I., The dynamics of self-developing processes, Vulkanol. Seismol., 1991, no. 4, pp. 61–72.

  9. Malyshev, A.I., Hyperbolic patterns in the seismicity preceding the November 12, 1964 eruption of Shiveluch Volcano, Vulkanol. Seismol., 2000, no. 3, pp. 70–78.

  10. Malyshev, A.I., Zakonomernosti nelineinogo razvitiya seismicheskogo protsessa (Patterns in the Nonlinear Evolution of the Seismic Process), Yekaterinburg: IGG UrO RAN, 2005.

  11. Malyshev, A.I., First results from a 3D monitoring of seismic activity and the prospects it offers, Ezhegodnik-2013 (Annual-2013), Proc. Zavaritsky Institute of Geology and Geochemistry, 2014, no. 161, pp. 390–395.

  12. Malyshev, A.I., Estimating the predictability of the seismicity rate: The 1964 eruption of Shiveluch Volcano, J. Volcanol. Seismol., 2016, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 347–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Malyshev, A.I., The predictability of seismicity and large earthquakes: Kamchatka 1962 to 2014, J. Volcanol. Seismol., 2019, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 42–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Malyshev, A.I. and Malysheva, L.K., The predictability of seismic energy flux in the northwestern Pacific rim based on the USGS catalog, Geosistemy Perekhodnykh Zon, 2018, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tikhonov, I.N., Metody i rezul’taty analiza katalogov zemletryasenii dlya tselei sredne- i kratkosrochnogo prognozov sil’nykh seismicheskikh sobytii (Methods and Results from the Analysis of Earthquake Catalogs with a View to Intermediate-Term and Short-Term Prediction of Large Seismic Events), IMGiG DVO RAN, 2006.

  16. Tikhonov, I.N., A Methodology for Prediction of Large Earthquakes Using the Behavior of Seismicity: The Northwest Pacific Belt, Extended Abstract of Dr. Sci. (Phys.–Math.) Dissertation, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk: IMGiG DVO RAN, 2009.

  17. Voight, B., A method for prediction of volcanic eruptions, Nature, 1988, vol. 332, pp. 125–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was performed as part of the state task of Institute of Geology and Geochemistry (IGG), Ural Branch (UB), Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) (topic no. АААА-А19-119072990020-6).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. I. Malyshev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malyshev, A.I. Predictability of the Seismic Energy Flux: Southern Europe and the Mediterranean. J. Volcanolog. Seismol. 14, 30–43 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0742046320010030

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0742046320010030

Keywords:

Navigation