Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neurophysiological Parameters in Patients after Coronary Bypass Grafting Depending on the Success of Dual-Task Rehabilitation

  • Published:
Human Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

The effect of dual-task cognitive training on neurophysiological parameters of patients with postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in the early postoperative period of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) under cardiopulmonary bypass was examined. The study involved 96 male patients who underwent CABG. All patients underwent a detailed neuropsychological and electroencephalogram (EEG) analysis before and after CABG. On day 2 or 3 after surgery, all patients were diagnosed with POCD and randomly divided into two groups: a group who received training (n = 54) and a group with no training (n = 42). From days 3–4 of the postoperative period, a daily course of dual-task training (simultaneous performance of cognitive and physical tasks) was carried out. Repeated diagnostics for POCD was carried out at the end of the training course, on days 8–11. It was demonstrated that patients who successfully completed the training course (with no POCD on days 8–11) showed a postoperative power decrease in θ1-rhythm, while in all patients with POCD, these indices increased compared to preoperative data. Topographic changes in θ1 rhythm were detected in the left parietal areas, which may be indicative of the impaired perfusion in these regions of the brain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Talamonti, D., Vincent, T., Fraser, S., et al., The benefits of physical activity in individuals with cardiovascular risk factors: a longitudinal investigation using fNIRS and dual-task walking, J. Clin. Med., 2021, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 579.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. De Vito, A., Bernstein, J., Weitzner, D., et al., The effects of cardiovascular risk factors on repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS) performance in cognitively healthy older adults, Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol., 2021, vol. 36, no. 2, p. 165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao, E., Lowres, N., Woolaston, A., et al., Prevalence and patterns of cognitive impairment in acute coronary syndrome patients: a systematic review, Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol., 2020, vol. 27, no. 3, p. 284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Trubnikova, O.A., Tarasova, I.V., and Barbarash, O.L., Neurophysiological mechanisms and perspective for the use of dual tasks in recovering cognitive function after cardiac surgery, Fundam. Klin. Med., 2020, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tang, V.L., Jing, B., Boscardin, J., et al., Association of functional, cognitive, and psychological measures with 1-year mortality in patients undergoing major surgery, JAMA Surg., 2020, vol. 155, no. 5, p. 412.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Relander, K., Hietanen, M., Rantanen, K., et al., Postoperative cognitive change after cardiac surgery predicts long-term cognitive outcome, Brain Behav., 2020, vol. 10, no. 9. e01750

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ludyga, S., Gerber, M., Pühse, U., et al., Systematic review and meta-analysis investigating moderators of long-term effects of exercise on cognition in healthy individuals, Nat. Hum. Behav., 2020, vol. 4, no. 6, p. 603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Greaves, D., Psaltis, P., Davis, D., et al., Risk factors for delirium and cognitive decline following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis, J. Am. Heart Assoc., 2020, vol. 9, no. 22. e017275.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bech, S.R., Kjeldgaard-Man, L., Sirbaugh, M.C., et al., Attentional capacity during dual-task balance performance deteriorates with age before the sixties, Exp. Aging Res., 2021, vol. 48, no. 1, p. 86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Akin, H., Senel, A., Taskiran, H., and Kaya Mutlu, E., Do motor-cognitive and motor—motor dual task training effect differently balance performance in older adults? Eur. Geriatr. Med., 2021, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gallou-Guyot, M., Mandigout, S., Combourieu-Donnezan, L., et al., Cognitive and physical impact of cognitive-motor dual-task training in cognitively impaired older adults: an overview, Neurophysiol. Clin., 2020, vol. 50, no. 6, p. 441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cisneros, E., Beauséjour, V., de Guise, E., et al., The impact of multimodal cognitive rehabilitation on executive functions in older adults with traumatic brain injury, Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med., 2021, vol. 64, no. 5, p. 101559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sarasso, E., Agosta, F., Piramide, N., et al., Brain activity of the emotional circuit in Parkinson’s disease patients with freezing of gait, Neuroimage Clin., 2021, vol. 30, p. 102649.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Johansson, H., Ekman, U., Rennie, L., et al., Dual-task effects during a motor-cognitive task in Parkinson’s disease: patterns of prioritization and the influence of cognitive status, Neurorehabil. Neural Repair, 2021, vol. 35, no. 4, p. 356.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tarasova, I.V., Trubnikova, O.A., Kukhareva, I.N., and Barbarash, O.L., Methodic approaches to the diagnosis of postoperative cognitive dysfunction in cardiac surgery clinic, Kompleksn. Probl. Serdechno-Sosudistykh Zabol., 2015, no. 4, p. 73.

  16. Tarasova, I.V., Volf, N.V., Kupriyanova, D.S., et al., Changes in event-related synchronization/desynchronization of brain cortex electric activity in cardiosurgical patients with postoperative cognitive dysfunction, Sib. Nauchn. Med. Zh., 2021, vol. 41, no. 2, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schumacher, J., Taylor, J.P., Hamilton, C.A., et al., Quantitative EEG as a biomarker in mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies, Alzheimers Res. Ther., 2020, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Benwell, C.S.Y., Davila-Pérez, P., Fried, P.J., et al., EEG spectral power abnormalities and their relationship with cognitive dysfunction in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and type 2 diabetes, Neurobiol. Aging, 2020, vol. 85, p. 83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhavoronkova, L.A., Shevtsova, T.P., Moraresku, S.I., et al., Intracortical connections in dual tasks including motor and computing—logical or spatial–visual components, Hum. Physiol., 2019, vol. 45, no. 2, p. 126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fallahtafti, F., Boron, J.B., Venema, D.M., et al., Task specificity impacts dual-task interference in older adults, Aging Clin. Exp. Res., 2021, vol. 33, no. 3, p. 581.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghai, S., Ghai, I., and Effenberg, A.O., Effects of dual tasks and dual-task training on postural stability: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Clin. Interv. Aging, 2017, vol. 12, p. 557.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ljubisavljevic, M.R., Oommen, J., Filipovic, S., et al., Effects of tDCS of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on dual-task performance involving manual dexterity and cognitive task in healthy older adults, Front. Aging Neurosci., 2019, vol. 11, p. 144.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Li, K.Z.H., Bherer, L., Mirelman, A., et al., Cognitive involvement in balance, gait and dual-tasking in aging: a focused review from a neuroscience of aging perspective, Front. Neurol., 2018, vol. 9, p. 913.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (basic topic no. 122012000364-5 dated January 20, 2022). There was no sponsor involvement in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; in writing of the report; or in the decision to submit it for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russia

    D. S. Kupriyanova, I. V. Tarasova, O. A. Trubnikova, A. S. Sosnina, I. N. Kukhareva, I. D. Syrova & O. L. Barbarash

Authors
  1. D. S. Kupriyanova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. V. Tarasova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. O. A. Trubnikova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. S. Sosnina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. I. N. Kukhareva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. I. D. Syrova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. O. L. Barbarash
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.S. Kupriyanova, manuscript writing, collection and processing of the experimental data, statistical treatment. I.V. Tarasova, concept and design of the study, statistical treatment, writing and editing the manuscript. О.А. Trubnikova, concept and design of the study, editing the text of the manuscript, approval of the final version of the manuscript. A.S. Sosnina, collection and processing of the experimental data. I.N. Kukhareva, collection and processing of the experimental data. I.D. Syrova, collection and processing of the experimental data. O.L. Barbarash, critical analysis of intellectual content, approval of the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. V. Tarasova.

Ethics declarations

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

Conflict of interest. The authors declare the absence of an obvious and potential conflict of interest related to the publication of this article.

Statement of compliance with standards of research involving humans as subjects. All studies were carried out in accordance with the principles of biomedical ethics formulated in the Declaration of Helsinki of 1964 and its subsequent updates. The research program was approved by the Local Commission on Biomedical Ethics of the Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases (Kemerovo). Each participant in the study provided a signed voluntary written informed consent after explaining the potential risks and benefits, as well as the nature of the upcoming study.

Additional information

Translated by N. Maleeva

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kupriyanova, D.S., Tarasova, I.V., Trubnikova, O.A. et al. Neurophysiological Parameters in Patients after Coronary Bypass Grafting Depending on the Success of Dual-Task Rehabilitation. Hum Physiol 49, 107–114 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119722700165

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119722700165

Keywords:

Search

Navigation