Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Fixed Point Marks on Maintaining a Vertical Posture when Observing a Virtual Three-Dimensional Object Linked to Body Oscillations

  • Published:
Human Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of additional visual information on the process of maintaining a vertical posture on a compliant support was studied. The subjects stood in stereo glasses and a mask that limited the field of view in a darkened room in front of a screen on which a three-dimensional image of a dark gray sphere was projected. The virtual sphere covered a field of view of approximately 36°. The presentation of the sphere was combined with the introduction of additional fixed objects (dots with an area of 1 cm2). The latter, in the amount of one or four, could be present in different places, but within the area covered by the sphere. In the control trials, the sphere was motionless. In test trials, the position of the sphere depended on body oscillations in the anteroposterior and lateral directions in such a way that body shifts caused the sphere to move in the same (in-phase connection, IP) or opposite directions (antiphase connection, AP). The contribution of visual control to posture maintenance was assessed by changes in the amplitude—frequency characteristics of elementary variables calculated from the trajectory of the sole center of pressure (CP). These variables were the vertical projection of the body’s center of gravity (CG) and the difference between the CP and the vertical projection of the center of gravity (CP–CG). An analysis of the CG and CP–CG variables revealed a clear dependence of their spectra on the direction of the connection between the shifts of the body and the sphere, as well as the influence of the presence of fixed points on this dependence. Thus, in test trials, in standing position with open eyes and in the absence of additional fixed points, the oscillations in the sagittal plane increased significantly compared to the control. In particular, there was an approximately 2.5-fold increase in the root-mean-square value of the amplitude spectra (RMS) under IP conditions and a 2-fold increase under AP conditions, while the RMS values of the spectra were also significantly higher than when standing with closed eyes. When one fixed point was added in the center of the screen as a fixed reference point, the oscillations practically did not change. When four points symmetrically located at a distance of 8.75 cm from the center of the screen were added, the RMS spectra of both variables decreased by 20–25%. With an increase in the distance between the points up to 35 cm, a further 30–35% decrease in body oscillations was observed. At a distance of 70 cm between the points (equal to the sphere diameter), the RMS of the spectra decreased by 45–50%. Under these conditions, the magnitude of body oscillations became approximately the same as with closed eyes. Thus, it is shown that under conditions of instability of the visual environment, the presence of stationary objects of small size significantly affects posture maintenance, but the quality of standing still remains lower than in a stationary visual environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Perennou, D., Mazibrada, G., Chauvineau, V., et al. Lateropulsion, pushing and verticality perception in hemisphere stroke: a causal relationship? Brain, 2008, vol. 131, p. 2401.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barra, J., Oujamaa, L., Chauvineau, V., et al., Asymmetric standing posture after stroke is related to a biased egocentric coordinate system, Neurology, 2009, vol. 72, no. 18, p. 1582.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonan, I.V., Hubeaux, K., Gellez-Leman, M.C., et al., Influence of subjective visual vertical misperception on balance recovery after stroke, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 2007, vol. 78, no. 1, p. 49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Keisuke, T., Sho, I., Shinji, Y., et al., Effect of dynamic visual motion on perception of postural vertical through the modulation of prior knowledge of gravity, Neurosci. Lett., 2020, vol. 716, p. 134687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Balestrucci, P., Daprati, E., Lacquaniti, F., and Maffei, V., Effects of visual motion consistent or inconsistent with gravity on postural sway, Exp. Brain Res., 2017, vol. 235, no. 7, p. 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Angelaki, D.E., Gu, Y., and DeAngelis, G.C., Multisensory integration: psychophysics, neurophysiology, and computation, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 2009, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 452.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Trousselard, M., Cian, C., Nougier, V., et al. Contribution of somesthetic cues to the perception of body orientation and subjective visual vertical, Percept. Psychophys., 2003, vol. 65, no. 8, p. 1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carriot, J., Barraud, P.A., and Nougier, V., and Cian, C., Difference in the perception of the horizon during true and simulated tilt in the absence of semicircular canal cues, Exp. Brain Res., 2006, vol. 174, no. 1, p. 158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carriot, J., Dizio, P., and Nougier, V., Vertical frames of reference and control of body orientation, Neurophysiol. Clin., 2008, vol. 38, no. 6, p. 423.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cian, C., Esquivie, D., Barraud, P.A., and Raphel, C., Respective contribution of orientation contrast and illusion of self-tilt to the rod-and-frame effect, Perception., 1995, vol. 24, no. 6, p. 623.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dichgans, J., Held, R., Young, L.R., and Brandt, T., Moving visual scenes influence the apparent direction of gravity, Science, 1972, vol. 178, no. 4066, p. 1217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Roberts, R.E., Da Silva Melo, M., Siddiqui, A.A., et al., Vestibular and oculomotor influences on visual dependency, J. Neurophysiol., 2016, vol. 116, no. 3, p. 1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. De Vrijer, M., Medendorp, W.P., and Van Gisbergen, J.A., Shared computational mechanism for tilt compensation accounts for biased verticality percepts in motion and pattern vision, J. Neurophysiol., 2008, vol. 99, no. 2, p. 915.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tarnutzer, A.A., Bockisch, C., Straumann, D., and Olasagasti, I., Gravity dependence of subjective visual vertical variability, J. Neurophysiol., 2009, vol. 102, no. 3, p. 1657.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schuler, J.R., Bockisch, C.J., Straumann, D., and Tarnutzer, A.A., Precision and accuracy of the subjective haptic vertical in the roll plane, BMC Neurosci., 2010, vol. 11, p. 83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wade, S.W. and Curthoys, I.S., The effect of ocular torsional position on perception of the roll-tilt of visual stimuli, Neurosci. Lett., 2020, vol. 716, p. 134687.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kozhina, G.V., Levik, Yu.S., Popov, A.K., et al., Visuomotor adaptation in healthy humans in standing position under the conditions of destabilization of virtual visual environment, Hum. Physiol., 2018, vol 44, no. 5, p. 517. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119718050055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Smetanin, B.N., Levik, Yu.S., Kozhina, G.V., and Popov, A.K., The influence of the size of the object, providing the visual feedback on the maintenance of the vertical posture in humans, Hum. Physiol., 2020, vol. 46, no. 6, p. 677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Burdea, G. and Coiffet, P., Virtual Reality Technology, New York: Wiley, 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Benjuya, N., Melzer, I., and Kaplanski, J., Aging-induced shifts from a reliance on sensory input to muscle cocontraction during balanced standing, J. Gerontol., Ser. A, 2004, vol. 59, no. 2, p. 166.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wiesmeier, I.K., Dalin, D., and Maurer, C., Elderly use proprioception rather than visual and vestibular cues for postural motor control, Front. Aging Neurosci., 2015, vol. 7, p. 97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vieiran, T. M., de Oliveiran, L.F., and Nadal, J., An overview of age-related changes in postural control during quiet standing tasks using classical and modern stabilometric descriptors, J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol., 2009, vol. 19, no. 6, p. 513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Seigle, B., Ramdani, S., and Bernard, P.L., Dynamical structure of center of pressure fluctuations in elderly people, Gait Posture, 2009, vol. 30, no. 2, p. 223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Prieto, T.E., Myklebust, J.B., Hoffmann, R.G., et al., Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1996, vol. 43, no. 9, p. 956.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fino, P.C., Mojdehi, A.R., Adjerid, K., et al., Comparing postural stability entropy analyses to differentiate fallers and non-fallers, Ann. Biomed. Eng., 2016, vol. 44, no. 5, p. 1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Danna-Dos-Santos, A., Degani, A.M., Boonstra, T.W., et al., The influence of visual information on multi-muscle control during quiet stance: a spectral analysis approach, Exp. Brain Res., 2015, vol. 233, no. 2, p. 657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Oie, K.S., Kiemel, T., and Jeka, J.J., Multisensory fusion: simultaneous re-weighting of vision and touch for the control of human posture, Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res., 2002, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Polastri, P.F. and Barela, J.A., Adaptive visual re-weighting in children’s postural control, PLoS One, 2013, vol. 8, no. 12. e82215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mahboobin, A., Loughlin, P.J., Redfern, M.S., and Sparto, P.J., Sensory re-weighting in human postural control during moving-scene perturbations, Exp. Brain Res., 2005, vol. 167, no. 2, p. 260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Borger, L.L., Whitney, S.L., Redfern, M.S., and Furman, J.M., The influence of dynamic visual environments on postural sway in the elderly, J. Vestib. Res., 1999, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was carried out within the State Task of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, project no. 0061-2019-0012.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. N. Smetanin.

Ethics declarations

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the biomedical ethics principles formulated in the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments and approved by the local Bioethics Committee of the Kharkevich Institute for Information Transmission Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow).

Conflict of interest. The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Informed consent. Each study participant provided a voluntary written informed consent signed by him after explaining to him the potential risks and benefits, as well as the nature of the upcoming study.

Additional information

Translated by E. Babchenko

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kozhina, G.V., Levik, Y.S., Popov, A.K. et al. Influence of Fixed Point Marks on Maintaining a Vertical Posture when Observing a Virtual Three-Dimensional Object Linked to Body Oscillations. Hum Physiol 48, 687–695 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119722700128

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119722700128

Keywords:

Navigation