Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigation of the Amplitude–Time Characteristics of the N200 and P600 Waves of Event-Related Potentials during Processing of the Distance of Tonal Modulation

  • Published:
Human Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The characteristics of neurocognitive processes during the perception of tonal modulation by using the technique of event-related potentials (ERPs) have been studied. The study involved 20 volunteers (six men, the average age of the participants was 19.7 ± 2.3 years). All the participants were right-handed; none of them had a professional musical education. The participants were asked to listen to a series of harmonic progressions with tonal modulation to the subdominant (near modulation, replacement of one tone with respect to the beginning scale), to the ascending minor sixth (distant modulation, replacement of four tones with respect to the beginning scale) and to the triton (distant modulation, replacement of six tones with respect to the beginning scale). The set of stimuli also included zero-step modulation to establish a baseline for the modulating stimuli. The data showed that N200 was decreased when listening to harmonic progressions regardless of the degree of modulation. It was found that the amplitude of P600 increased in response to an increase in the tonal distance between the beginning and ending tonalities, i.e., in response to an increase in the degree of modulation. This suggests that the amplitude of P600 corresponds to the degree of violation of tonal expectations, which, in turn, is associated with an increase in the complexity of the mental reorientation of the tonal scheme from one tonality to another tonality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price includes VAT (Austria)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Fedotchev, A.I. and Radchenko, G.S., Music therapy and brain music: the state, problems and prospective studies, Usp. Fiziol. Nauk, 2013, vol. 44, no. 4, p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pavlygina, R.A., Davydov, V.I., and Tutushkina, M.V., Effect of music on the latency of recognition of even and odd numbers, Hum. Physiol., 2011, vol. 37, no. 2, p. 250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Konstantinov, K.V., Leonova, M.K., Miroshni-kov, D.B., and Klimenko, V.M., Characteristics of the perception of acoustic images of intrinsic electrical activity by the brain, Neurosci. Behav. Physiol., 2016, vol. 46, no. 1, p. 57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fedotchev, A.I., Bondar’, A.T., Bakhchina, A.V., Parin, S.B., Polevaya, S.A., and Radchenko, G.S., Effects of musical acoustic signals controlled by the subject’s EEG oscillators, Neurosci. Behav. Physiol., 2017, vol. 47, no. 1, p. 47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fedotchev, A.I., Bondar, A.T., Bakhchina, A.V., et al., Transformation of the patient’s EEG of patient’s oscillators into music-like signals in correction of stressinduced functional states, Sovrem. Tekhnol. Med., 2016, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dubovskii, I., Evseev, S., Sposobin, I., and Sokolov, V., Uchebnik Garmonii (Manual of Harmony), Moscow: Muzyka, 1965, p. 436.

  7. Sposobin, I., Lektsii po kursu garmonii. V literaturnoi obrabotke Yu. Kholopova (Lectures on Harmonics in the Literature Overview of Yu. Kholopov), Moscow: Muzyka, 1969, p. 240.

  8. Krumhansl, C.L. and Kessler, E.J., Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organisation in a spatialrepresentation of musical keys, Psychol. Rev., 1982, vol. 89, no. 4, p. 334.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Koelsch, S., Gunter, T., Schröger, E., and Friederici, A.D., Processing tonal modulations: an ERP study, J. Cognit. Neurosci., 2003, vol. 15, no. 8, p. 1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Koelsch, S. and Jentschke, S., Short-term effects of processing musical syntax: an ERP study, Brain Res., 2008, vol. 1212, p. 55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Loui, P., Grent-'t-Jong, T., Torpey, D., and Woldorff, M.G., Effects of attention on the neural processing of harmonic syntax in Western music, Cognit. Brain Res., 2005, vol. 25, no. 3, p. 678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brattico, E., Jacobsen, T., De Baene, W., et al., Cognitive vs. affective listening modes and judgments of music—an ERP study, Biol. Psychol., 2010, vol. 85, no. 3, p. 393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Patel, A.D., Gibson, E., Ratner, J., et al., Processing syntactic relations in language and music: an event-related potential study, J. Cognit. Neurosci., 1998, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 717.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, S., Kim, J.S., Seol, J., et al., Melody effects on ERANm elicited by harmonic irregularity in musical syntax, Brain Res., 2014, vol. 1560, p. 36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sammler, D., Koelsch, S., and Friederici, A.D., Are left fronto-temporal brain areas a prerequisite for normal music-syntactic processing? Cortex, 2011, vol. 47, no. 6, p. 659.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., and Holcomb, P., The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty, Lang. Cognit. Process., 2000, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Carrus, E., Pearce, M.T., and Bhattacharya, J., Melodic pitch expectation interacts with neural responses to syntactic but not semantic violations, Cortex, 2013, vol. 49, no. 8, p. 2186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lelekov, T., Dominey, P.F., and Garcia-Larrea, L., Dissociable ERP profiles for processing rules vs. instances in a cognitive sequencing task, NeuroReport, 2000, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 1129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lerdahl, F., Tonal Pitch Space, New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2001, p. 411.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Purwins, H., Blankertz, B., and Obermayer, K., Toroidal models in tonal theory and pitch-class analysis, in Tonal Theory for the Digital Age, Computing in Musicology Series vol. 15, Stanford: Center Comput. Assisted Res. Humanit., 2007, p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tadel, F., Baillet, S., Mosher, J.C., et al., Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis, Comput. Intell. Neurosci., 2011, vol. 2011, art. ID 879716.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Luck, S.J., An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005, p. 374.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Folstein, J.R. and van Petten, C., Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP, Psychophysiology, 2008, vol. 45, no. 1, p. 152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Coulson, S., King, J., and Kutas, M., Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations, Lang. Cognit. Process., 1998, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaan, E. and Swaab, T., Repair, revision and complexity in syntactic analysis: an electrophysiological investigation, J. Cognit. Neurosci., 2003, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gouvea, A.C., Phillips, C., Kazanina, N., and Poeppel, D., The linguistic processes underlying the P600, Lang. Cognit. Process., 2010, vol. 25, no. 2, p. 149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 16-36-00099) and Russian Humanitarian Research Foundation (Grant of the RHRF No. 16-06-00133).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nizhny Novgorod State University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

    G. S. Radchenko & K. N. Gromov

  2. Touro College, Touro College, Manhattan, New York, United States

    M. N. Korsakova-Kreyn

  3. Institute of Cell Biophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Moscow region, Russia

    A. I. Fedotchev

Authors
  1. G. S. Radchenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. N. Gromov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. N. Korsakova-Kreyn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. I. Fedotchev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. S. Radchenko.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of compliance with standards of research involving humans as subjects. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants involved in the study. The experiment was organized and carried out in compliance with the ethical standards established in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration (adopted in June 1964 (Helsinki, Finland) and revised in October 2000 (Edinburgh, Scotland)).

Additional information

Translated by L. A. Solovyova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Radchenko, G.S., Gromov, K.N., Korsakova-Kreyn, M.N. et al. Investigation of the Amplitude–Time Characteristics of the N200 and P600 Waves of Event-Related Potentials during Processing of the Distance of Tonal Modulation. Hum Physiol 45, 137–144 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119719020105

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119719020105

Keywords:

Search

Navigation